Jennifer Ku1, Alana McEvoy, Kyra E Pyke. 1. Cardiovascular Stress Response Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The upper limit of brachial artery (BA) flow-mediated dilation (FMD) has not been thoroughly interrogated, and long duration occlusion + handgrip exercise may create larger shear stress stimuli than previous manipulations. PURPOSE: To determine whether novel combinations of occlusion + handgrip exercise can extend the range of FMD stimulus-response relationship characterization and permit identification of a BA-FMD response ceiling. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects performed eight reactive hyperemia (RH) FMD trials: 5, 10, and 15 min of occlusion (5RH, 10RH, 15RH); 5, 10 and 15 min of occlusion + 3-min ischemic exercise (IE) (5IE, 10IE, 15IE); 10 and 15 min of occlusion + 3-min IE + 4-min post-occlusion exercise (PE) (10IEPE, 15IEPE). Shear stress was estimated as shear rate (SR = blood velocity/BA diameter; (ultrasound assessment)) (SR stimulus = area under the curve (AUC) until peak diameter). Data are mean ± SE. RESULTS: There were no differences in SR-AUC among IE and IEPE trials (p > 0.70), however, IE consistently increased the SR-AUC (IE + IEPE trial average 17,845.1 ± 2,023.3 a.u.) vs. the 5RH and 10RH trials (4,943.0 ± 428.4 a.u., 6,800.6 ± 805.9 a.u.) (p < 0.05). The %FMD ranged from 7.3 ± 0.8% (5RH) to 19.1 ± 2.0% (15IEPE) (p < 0.001) with no differences among IE and IEPE trials (p > 0.16). FMD increased with increasing SR-AUC (all subjects, all trials: r(2) 0.36, p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The stimulus created by brief (5 min) occlusion + ischemic exercise was not significantly enhanced by prolonging occlusion or continuing to exercise post-occlusion. The FMD response did not clearly plateau with increasing stimulus magnitude; however, the FMD capacity was shown to be more than double the FMD magnitude that was elicited with a standard 5-min occlusion test.
INTRODUCTION: The upper limit of brachial artery (BA) flow-mediated dilation (FMD) has not been thoroughly interrogated, and long duration occlusion + handgrip exercise may create larger shear stress stimuli than previous manipulations. PURPOSE: To determine whether novel combinations of occlusion + handgrip exercise can extend the range of FMD stimulus-response relationship characterization and permit identification of a BA-FMD response ceiling. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects performed eight reactive hyperemia (RH) FMD trials: 5, 10, and 15 min of occlusion (5RH, 10RH, 15RH); 5, 10 and 15 min of occlusion + 3-min ischemic exercise (IE) (5IE, 10IE, 15IE); 10 and 15 min of occlusion + 3-min IE + 4-min post-occlusion exercise (PE) (10IEPE, 15IEPE). Shear stress was estimated as shear rate (SR = blood velocity/BA diameter; (ultrasound assessment)) (SR stimulus = area under the curve (AUC) until peak diameter). Data are mean ± SE. RESULTS: There were no differences in SR-AUC among IE and IEPE trials (p > 0.70), however, IE consistently increased the SR-AUC (IE + IEPE trial average 17,845.1 ± 2,023.3 a.u.) vs. the 5RH and 10RH trials (4,943.0 ± 428.4 a.u., 6,800.6 ± 805.9 a.u.) (p < 0.05). The %FMD ranged from 7.3 ± 0.8% (5RH) to 19.1 ± 2.0% (15IEPE) (p < 0.001) with no differences among IE and IEPE trials (p > 0.16). FMD increased with increasing SR-AUC (all subjects, all trials: r(2) 0.36, p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The stimulus created by brief (5 min) occlusion + ischemic exercise was not significantly enhanced by prolonging occlusion or continuing to exercise post-occlusion. The FMD response did not clearly plateau with increasing stimulus magnitude; however, the FMD capacity was shown to be more than double the FMD magnitude that was elicited with a standard 5-min occlusion test.
Authors: Dick H J Thijssen; Mark A Black; Kyra E Pyke; Jaume Padilla; Greg Atkinson; Ryan A Harris; Beth Parker; Michael E Widlansky; Michael E Tschakovsky; Daniel J Green Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Ryan A Harris; Steven K Nishiyama; D Walter Wray; Vince Tedjasaputra; Damian M Bailey; Russell S Richardson Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: M J Mullen; R K Kharbanda; J Cross; A E Donald; M Taylor; P Vallance; J E Deanfield; R J MacAllister Journal: Circ Res Date: 2001-02-02 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: T Neunteufl; R Katzenschlager; A Hassan; U Klaar; S Schwarzacher; D Glogar; P Bauer; F Weidinger Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 1997-02-28 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: D Walter Wray; Melissa A H Witman; Stephen J Ives; John McDaniel; Anette S Fjeldstad; Joel D Trinity; Jamie D Conklin; Mark A Supiano; Russell S Richardson Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield Journal: Lancet Date: 1992-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321