Literature DB >> 24622050

Actual evidence in the medical approach to adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

S Negrini1, J C De Mauroy, T B Grivas, P Knott, T Kotwicki, T Maruyama, J P O'Brien, M Rigo, F Zaina.   

Abstract

Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine and trunk. The most common form involve adolescents. The prevalence is 2-3% of the population, with 1 out of 6 patients requiring treatment of which 25% progress to surgery. Physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) plays a primary role in the so-called conservative treatment of adolescents with IS, since all the therapeutic tools used (exercises and braces) fall into the PRM domain. According to a Cochrane systematic review there is evidence in favor of bracing, even if it is of low quality. Recently, a controlled prospective trial including a randomised arm gave more strength to this conclusion. Another Cochrane review shows that there is evidence in favor of exercises as an adjunctive treatment, but of low quality. Three meta-analysis have been published on bracing: one shows that bracing does not reduce surgery rates, but studies with bracing plus exercises were not included and had the highest effectiveness; another shows that full time is better than part-time bracing; the last focuses on observational studies following the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) criteria and shows that not all full time rigid bracing are the same: some have the highest effectiveness, others have less than elastic and nighttime bracing. Two very important RCTs failed in recruitment, showing that in the field of bracing for scoliosis RCTs are not accepted by the patients. Consensuses by the international Society on Scoliosis Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) show that there is no agreement among experts either on the best braces or on their biomechanical action, and that compliance is a matter of clinical more than patients' behavior (there is strong agreement on the management criteria to achieve best results with bracing). A systematic review of all the existing studies shows effectiveness of exercises, and that auto-correction is their main goal. A systematic review shows that there are no studies on manual treatment. The SOSORT Guidelines offer the actual standard of conservative care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24622050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1973-9087            Impact factor:   2.874


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : Guideline for practical application].

Authors:  J Seifert; F Thielemann; P Bernstein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Letter to the editor concerning: "active self-correction and task-oriented exercises reduce spinal deformity and improve quality of life in subjects with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of a randomised controlled trial" by Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Cazzaniga D, Rocca B, Ferrante S (2014). Eur Spine J; DOI:10.1007/s00586-014-3241-y.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Josette Bettany-Saltikov; Jean Claude De Mauroy; Jacek Durmala; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Joseph P O'Brien; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; Monica Villagrasa; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Efficacy of Task Oriented Exercise Program Based on Ergonomics on Cobb's Angle and Pulmonary Function Improvement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis- A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar; Santosh Kumar; Vineet Sharma; R N Srivastava; Anil Kumar Gupta; Anit Parihar; Vikas Verma; Dileep Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

4.  Observational retrospective study on socio-economic and quality of life outcomes in 41 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 5 years after bracing combined with physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE).

Authors:  Christine Wibmer; Pawel Trotsenko; Magdalena M Gilg; Andreas Leithner; Matthias Sperl; Vinay Saraph
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evidence for intrinsic factors driving aetiology and progression.

Authors:  Matthew M P Newton Ede; Simon W Jones
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Research quality in scoliosis conservative treatment: state of the art.

Authors:  Fabio Zaina; Michele Romano; Patrick Knott; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Theodoros B Grivas; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Joseph O'Brien; Manuel Rigo; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-07-11

Review 7.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and back pain.

Authors:  Federico Balagué; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-09-09

8.  Patient-reported side effects immediately after chiropractic scoliosis treatment: a cross-sectional survey utilizing a practice-based research network.

Authors:  A Joshua Woggon; Dennis A Woggon
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-10-05

9.  Curve progression 25 years after bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long term comparative results between two matched groups of 18 versus 23 hours daily bracing.

Authors:  Stavros Pellios; Eustathios Kenanidis; Michael Potoupnis; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Fares E Sayegh; John Kirkos; George A Kapetanos
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-03-09

Review 10.  Effects of Exercise on Spinal Deformities and Quality of Life in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Shahnawaz Anwer; Ahmad Alghadir; Md Abu Shaphe; Dilshad Anwar
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.