| Literature DB >> 24621821 |
Vaibhav C Gole1, Kapil K Chousalkar1, Juliet R Roberts2, Margaret Sexton3, Damian May4, Jessica Tan4, Andreas Kiermeier4.
Abstract
Salmonella is an important foodborne pathogen, causing an estimated 11,992 cases of infection in Australia per year. Egg or egg product related salmonellosis is a major concern for the egg industry. Worldwide, S. Typhimurium is one of the most common serovars identified in Salmonella food poisoning cases. The current study investigated the ability of five S. Typhimurium strains to penetrate washed and unwashed eggs using whole egg and agar egg penetration methods. All S. Typhimurium strains were able to penetrate eggshells and survive in egg albumen (at 20°C) according to whole egg penetration results. Polymerase Chain Reaction results demonstrated that S. Typhimurium strain 2 (10(3) and 10(5) CFU/mL), and strain 5 (10(3) and 10(5) CFU/mL) egg penetration was significantly higher (p<0.05) in washed eggs when compared to unwashed eggs. Statistical analysis of the agar penetration experiment indicated that S. Typhimurium was able to penetrate washed eggs at a significantly higher rate when compared to unwashed eggs (p<0.05). When compared to unwashed eggs, washed eggs also had significantly damaged cuticles. Statistical analysis also indicated that eggshell penetration by S. Typhimurium was related to various eggshell ultrastructural features such as cap quality, alignment, erosion, confluence, Type B bodies and cuticle cover.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24621821 PMCID: PMC3951326 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Survival of Salmonella Typhimurium strains on eggshell surface after 21 days of incubation: Comparison between washed and unwashed eggs at 20°C.
|
| Dose of infection (CFU/mL) | Washing status | Eggshell contamination after incubation (Log CFU/eggshell) Mean ± SE | p-value |
|
| 103 | Washed | 3.09±0.82 | 0.68 |
| Unwashed | 2.51±1.08 | |||
| 105 | Washed | 4.09±0.27 | 0.34 | |
| Unwashed | 4.41±0.16 | |||
|
| 103 | Washed | 2.69±1.09 | 0.54 |
| Unwashed | 3.58±0.89 | |||
| 105 | Washed | 4.49±0.01 | 0.37 | |
| Unwashed | 3.58±0.89 | |||
|
| 103 | Washed | 2.23±0.92 | 0.33 |
| Unwashed | 0.89±0.89 | |||
| 105 | Washed | 3.42±0.92 | 0.34 | |
| Unwashed | 1.90±1.17 | |||
|
| 103 | Washed | 0.89±0.89 | 0.62 |
| Unwashed | 1.56±0.96 | |||
| 105 | Washed | 4.34±0.21 | 0.27 | |
| Unwashed | 3.22±0.85 | |||
|
| 103 | Washed | 1.67±1.04 | 0.59 |
| Unwashed | 2.51±1.05 | |||
| 105 | Washed | 2.12±0.88 | 0.06 | |
| Unwashed | 4.42±0.20 |
Survival of Salmonella Typhimurium strains on eggshell surface of unwashed eggs after 21 days of incubation: Comparison between 20°C and 37°C.
|
| Dose of infection (CFU/mL) | Temperature (°C) | Eggshell contamination after incubation (Log CFU/eggshell) Mean ± SE | p-value |
|
| 103 | 20 | 2.51±1.08 | 0.76 |
| 37 | 3.04±1.24 | |||
| 105 | 20 | 4.41±0.16 | 0.29 | |
| 37 | 4.69±0.18 | |||
|
| 103 | 20 | 3.58±0.89 | 0.02 |
| 37 | ND | |||
| 105 | 20 | 3.58±0.89 | 0.02 | |
| 37 | ND | |||
|
| 103 | 20 | 0.89±0.89 | 0.37 |
| 37 | ND | |||
| 105 | 20 | 1.90±1.17 | 0.18 | |
| 37 | ND | |||
|
| 103 | 20 | 1.56±0.96 | 0.18 |
| 37 | ND | |||
| 105 | 20 | 3.22±0.85 | 0.05 | |
| 37 | 0.69±0.69 | |||
|
| 103 | 20 | 2.51±1.05 | 0.07 |
| 37 | ND | |||
| 105 | 20 | 4.42±0.20 | 0.0001 | |
| 37 | ND |
ND: not detected.
Survival of Salmonella Typhimurium strains on the eggshell surface after 21 days of incubation: Comparison between different doses (103 and 105 CFU/mL) of infection.
|
| Temperature (°C) | Washing status | Dose of infection (CFU/mL) | Eggshell contamination after incubation (Log CFU/eggshell) Mean ± SE | p-value |
|
| 20 | Washed | 103 | 3.09±0.82 | 0.30 |
| 105 | 4.09±0.27 | ||||
| Unwashed | 103 | 2.51±1.08 | 0.15 | ||
| 105 | 4.41±0.16 | ||||
| 37 | Unwashed | 103 | 3.04±1.24 | 0.26 | |
| 105 | 4.69±0.18 | ||||
|
| 20 | Washed | 103 | 2.69±1.09 | 0.17 |
| 105 | 4.49 ±.013 | ||||
| Unwashed | 103 | 3.58±0.89 | 1.00 | ||
| 105 | 3.58±0.89 | ||||
| 37 | Unwashed | 103 | ND | NA | |
| 105 | ND | ||||
|
| 20 | Washed | 103 | 2.23±0.92 | 0.39 |
| 105 | 3.42±0.92 | ||||
| Unwashed | 103 | 0.89±0.89 | 0.51 | ||
| 105 | 1.90±1.17 | ||||
| 37 | Unwashed | 103 | ND | NA | |
| 105 | ND | ||||
|
| 20 | Washed | 103 | 0.89±0.89 | 0.02 |
| 105 | 4.37±0.21 | ||||
| Unwashed | 103 | 1.56±0.96 | 0.23 | ||
| 105 | 3.22±0.85 | ||||
| 37 | Unwashed | 103 | ND | 0.37 | |
| 105 | 0.69±0.69 | ||||
|
| 20 | Washed | 103 | 1.67±1.04 | 0.75 |
| 105 | 2.12±0.88 | ||||
| Unwashed | 103 | 2.59±1.05 | 0.11 | ||
| 105 | 4.47±0.20 | ||||
| 37 | Unwashed | 103 | ND | NA | |
| 105 | ND |
NA: Not applicable, ND: Not detected.
Whole egg penetration by different Salmonella Typhimurium strains: Comparison between washed and unwashed eggs at 20°C.
|
| Dose of inoculation (CFU/mL) | Method of analysis | Group | Number of penetrated pools (of 2 eggs) | Number of non-penetrated pools (of 2 eggs) | p-value |
|
| 103 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 1 | 4 | 1.00 |
| Unwashed | 0 | 5 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 4 | 1 | 1.00 | ||
| Unwashed | 5 | 0 | ||||
| 105 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 1 | 4 | 1.00 | |
| Unwashed | 1 | 4 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 3 | 2 | 1.00 | ||
| Unwashed | 4 | 1 | ||||
|
| 103 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 2 | 3 | 1.00 |
| Unwashed | 1 | 4 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 4 | 1 | 0.21 | ||
| Unwashed | 1 | 4 | ||||
| 105 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 4 | 1 | 0.04 | |
| Unwashed | 0 | 5 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 5 | 0 | 0.04 | ||
| Unwashed | 1 | 4 | ||||
|
| 103 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 0 | 5 | 1.00 |
| Unwashed | 0 | 5 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 3 | 2 | 0.17 | ||
| Unwashed | 0 | 5 | ||||
| 105 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 0 | 5 | 0.04 | |
| Unwashed | 4 | 1 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 4 | 1 | 1.00 | ||
| Unwashed | 4 | 1 | ||||
|
| 103 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 0 | 5 | 1.00 |
| Unwashed | 0 | 5 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 1 | 4 | 1.00 | ||
| Unwashed | 0 | 5 | ||||
| 105 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 0 | 5 | 1.00 | |
| Unwashed | 1 | 4 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 4 | 1 | 0.52 | ||
| Unwashed | 2 | 3 | ||||
|
| 103 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 1 | 4 | 1.00 |
| Unwashed | 0 | 5 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 4 | 1 | 0.04 | ||
| Unwashed | 0 | 5 | ||||
| 105 | Direct agar culture | Washed | 0 | 5 | 1.00 | |
| Unwashed | 1 | 4 | ||||
| PCR | Washed | 5 | 0 | 0.04 | ||
| Unwashed | 1 | 4 |
Relationship of washing and translucency with agar egg penetration by Salmonella Typhimurium.
| Number of penetrated (non -penetrated) eggs | ||||||
| Low Translucency | High Translucency | |||||
|
| Unwashed | Washed | Unwashed | Washed | p-value (Relationship of washing with agar egg penetration) | p-value (Relationship of translucency with agar egg penetration) |
|
| 5 (5) | 9 (1) | 5 (5) | 8 (2) | 0.02 | 0.73 |
|
| 10 (0) | 10 (0) | 10 (0) | 10 (0) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
|
| 4 (6) | 10 (0) | 7 (3) | 9 (1) | 0.002 | 0.41 |
|
| 4 (6) | 9 (1) | 4 (6) | 9 (1) | 0.0005 | 1.00 |
|
| 8 (2) | 10 (0) | 4 (6) | 8 (2) | 0.02 | 0.02 |
Effect of egg washing on cuticle score.
|
| Washing status | Number of eggs | Average cuticle score (Mean ± SE) | p-value |
|
| Washed | 32 | 3.60±0.09 | 0.0001 |
| Unwashed | 32 | 2.75±0.15 | ||
|
| Washed | 32 | 3.25±0.15 | 0.05 |
| Unwashed | 32 | 2.72±0.19 | ||
|
| Washed | 32 | 3.50±0.13 | 0.0001 |
| Unwashed | 32 | 2.59±0.14 | ||
|
| Washed | 32 | 3.19±0.16 | 0.01 |
| Unwashed | 32 | 2.59±0.16 | ||
|
| Washed | 32 | 2.81±0.16 | 0.01 |
| Unwashed | 32 | 2.28±0.15 |
Figure 1SEM image of good quality cuticle in unwashed eggs with no eggshell pores exposed.
Figure 2SEM image of damaged eggshell surface and exposed eggshell pore in washed eggs.
Relationship between eggshell ultrastructural parameters and penetration by Salmonella Typhimurium.
| Number of penetrated (non-penetrated) eggs | ||||||||||||||
| Alignment | Cuticle score | Confluence | Cap quality | |||||||||||
|
| Low | High | p-value | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | p-value | Low | High | p-value | Good | Poor | p-value |
|
| 4 (4) | 23 (9) | 0.44 | 1 (0) | 4 (3) | 6 (7) | 16 (3) | 0.09 | 21 (8) | 6 (5) | 0.51 | 9 (6) | 18 (7) | 0.97 |
|
| 11 (0) | 29 (0) | 1.00 | 4 (0) | 8 (0) | 12 (0) | 16 (0) | 1.00 | 20 (0) | 20 (0) | 1.00 | 20 (0) | 20 (0) | 1.00 |
|
| 11 (3) | 19 (7) | 0.83 | 0 (0) | 5 (8) | 9 (1) | 16 (1) | <0.01 | 22 (6) | 7 (4) | 0.03 | 5 (3) | 25 (7) | <0.01 |
|
| 4 (7) | 22 (7) | 0.04 | 1 (1) | 4 (7) | 11 (4) | 10 (2) | 0.09 | 23 (7) | 3 (7) | 0.01 | 6 (11) | 20 (3) | 0.35 |
|
| 9 (4) | 21 (6) | 0.03 | 6 (1) | 5 (4) | 13 (4) | 6 (1) | 0.46 | 29 (7) | 1 (3) | 0.01 | 2 (7) | 28 (3) | 0.002 |
Relationship between eggshell ultrastructural parameters and penetration by Salmonella Typhimurium.
| Number of penetrated (non-penetrated) eggs | |||||||||||||||
| Type A bodies | Type B bodies | Erosion | Argonite | Depression | |||||||||||
|
| Low | High | p-value | Low | High | p-value | Absent | Present | p-value | Absent | Present | p-value | Absent | Present | p-value |
|
| 25 (12) | 2 (1) | 0.39 | 13 (4) | 14 (9) | 0.007 | 15 (6) | 12 (7) | 0.07 | 27 (13) | 0 (0) | NA | 26 (13) | 1 (0) | 0.35 |
|
| 37 (0) | 3 (0) | 1.00 | 24 (0) | 16 (0) | 1.00 | 25 (0) | 15 (0) | 1.00 | 31 (0) | 9 (0) | 1.00 | 39 (0) | 1 (0) | 1.00 |
|
| 30 (10) | 0 (0) | NA | 3 (2) | 27 (8) | 0.64 | 13 (8) | 17 (2) | 0.09 | 30 (10) | 0 (0) | NA | 30 (10) | 0 (0) | NA |
|
| 23 (14) | 3 (0) | 0.55 | 11 (7) | 15 (7) | 0.77 | 8 (6) | 18 (8) | 0.01 | 22 (14) | 4 (0) | 0.07 | 26 (14) | 0 (0) | NA |
|
| 24 (10) | 6 (0) | 0.38 | 10 (5) | 20 (5) | 0.30 | 6 (2) | 24 (8) | 0.01 | 30 (10) | 0 (0) | NA | 30 (10) | 0 (0) | NA |
Figure 3SEM image showing large number of Type B bodies in eggshell.
Figure 4SEM image of good quality mamillary caps with better confluence.
Figure 5SEM image of extensive erosions throughout the eggshell.
Figure 6SEM image showing alignments in the mamillary layer.