Literature DB >> 24621144

Novel collagen membranes for the reconstruction of the corneal surface.

Corinna Petsch1, Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt, Ewa Meyer-Blazejewska, Markus Frey, Friedrich E Kruse, Björn O Bachmann.   

Abstract

No standardized biomaterial exists for the surgical treatment of persistent corneal erosions and ulcerations. We analyzed the suitability and biocompatibility of defined noncross-linked and UV/riboflavin cross-linked equine type I collagen membranes for the reconstruction of the corneal surface. Isolated human oral mucosa epithelial cells, a cell type in clinical use for the treatment of ocular surface diseases, were subcultivated on both types of membranes and examined concerning cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Biocompatibility was evaluated following superficial and intrastromal corneal transplantation in New Zealand white rabbits. In cell cultures all collagen membranes supported adhesion of oral mucosa epithelial cells leading to the formation of multilayered epithelial cell sheets. After intrastromal corneal implantation clinical signs of degradation were seen in all variants of collagen membranes, which was fastest in noncross-linked variants. The histological and ultrastructural level invasion of keratocytes and production of new collagen fibers inside the collagen membranes could be detected in noncross-linked variants. After superficial corneal implantation covering of the membranes by corneal epithelium over time was visible. Ultrastructural analysis showed a slower rate of degradation and less invading keratocytes in cross-linked variants compared with noncross-linked collagen membranes. Cross-linked and noncross-linked variants of the collagen membrane proofed to be suitable to serve as a carrier for epithelial stem cells in vitro and showed a high biocompatibility in vivo. These results indicate that the tested collagen membranes might be suitable for the reconstruction of the corneal surface in patients with nonhealing ulcerations. Whether membranes with faster or slower degradation properties are preferable for the treatment of persistent corneal ulcerations might depend on the underlying corneal pathology and the degree of concomitant inflammation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24621144     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  7 in total

Review 1.  [New possibilities for ocular surface reconstruction: collagen membranes and biocompatible elastomer nanofibers].

Authors:  T Fuchsluger; S Salehi; C Petsch; B Bachmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Role of corneal collagen fibrils in corneal disorders and related pathological conditions.

Authors:  Hong-Yan Zhou; Yan Cao; Jie Wu; Wen-Song Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  [Pediatric corneal surgery and corneal transplantation].

Authors:  B Bachmann; G Avgitidou; S Siebelmann; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Regenerative medicine for the corneal epithelium : Cell therapy from bench to bedside].

Authors:  Johannes Menzel-Severing; Kristina Spaniol; Florian Groeber-Becker; Gerd Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologie       Date:  2022-06-24

5.  Optimization of Corneal Epithelial Progenitor Cell Growth on Bombyx mori Silk Fibroin Membranes.

Authors:  Thomas A Hogerheyde; Shuko Suzuki; Jennifer Walshe; Laura J Bray; Sally A Stephenson; Damien G Harkin; Neil A Richardson
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 6.  Recovering vision in corneal epithelial stem cell deficient eyes.

Authors:  Kiranjit K Bains; Hideki Fukuoka; Greg M Hammond; Chie Sotozono; Andrew J Quantock
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.077

7.  Corneal Stroma Regeneration with Collagen-Based Hydrogel as an Artificial Stroma Equivalent: A Comprehensive In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Egor Olegovich Osidak; Andrey Yurevich Andreev; Sergey Eduardovich Avetisov; Grigory Victorovich Voronin; Zoya Vasilievna Surnina; Anna Vladimirovna Zhuravleva; Timofei Evgenievich Grigoriev; Sergey Vladimirovich Krasheninnikov; Kirill Konstantinovich Sukhinich; Oleg Vadimovich Zayratyants; Sergey Petrovich Domogatsky
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.967

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.