OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dose received by the hippocampus among patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer. METHODS: 10 patients with biopsy-proven, locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer constituted the study population. The total prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 70 Gy (D95%) delivered in 2.12-Gy daily fractions using IMRT. Using established anatomical guidelines, MRI co-registration and the assistance of a board-certified neuroradiologist, the right and left hippocampi were delineated on axial imaging from the CT scan obtained at simulation for each patient beginning at the most anterior portion of the lateral ventricle. IMRT treatment plans were generated without dose-volume constraints to the hippocampus. A range of dose-volume statistics was calculated. RESULTS: The mean hippocampus volume was 6.01 ± 2.61 cm(3). The mean V20 was 72.2%; V40 was 22.0%; V50 was 10.2%; and V60 was 5.5%. The average mean, minimum and maximum hippocampus doses were 30.27 Gy (range, 19.08-47.99 Gy); 17.54 Gy (range, 11.66-33.17 Gy); and 54.95 Gy (range, 35.59-75.57 Gy), respectively. The hippocampus received a maximum dose exceeding 70 Gy in 30% of cases. CONCLUSION: Our dosimetric analysis suggests that, for patients undergoing IMRT for nasopharyngeal cancer, the hippocampus routinely receives significantly high doses. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The hippocampus receives a fair amount of incidental radiation during treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer. Given the importance of this structure with respect to memory and neurocognitive function, consideration should be given to identifying the hippocampus as a critical organ at risk in the IMRT optimization process.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dose received by the hippocampus among patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer. METHODS: 10 patients with biopsy-proven, locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer constituted the study population. The total prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 70 Gy (D95%) delivered in 2.12-Gy daily fractions using IMRT. Using established anatomical guidelines, MRI co-registration and the assistance of a board-certified neuroradiologist, the right and left hippocampi were delineated on axial imaging from the CT scan obtained at simulation for each patient beginning at the most anterior portion of the lateral ventricle. IMRT treatment plans were generated without dose-volume constraints to the hippocampus. A range of dose-volume statistics was calculated. RESULTS: The mean hippocampus volume was 6.01 ± 2.61 cm(3). The mean V20 was 72.2%; V40 was 22.0%; V50 was 10.2%; and V60 was 5.5%. The average mean, minimum and maximum hippocampus doses were 30.27 Gy (range, 19.08-47.99 Gy); 17.54 Gy (range, 11.66-33.17 Gy); and 54.95 Gy (range, 35.59-75.57 Gy), respectively. The hippocampus received a maximum dose exceeding 70 Gy in 30% of cases. CONCLUSION: Our dosimetric analysis suggests that, for patients undergoing IMRT for nasopharyngeal cancer, the hippocampus routinely receives significantly high doses. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The hippocampus receives a fair amount of incidental radiation during treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer. Given the importance of this structure with respect to memory and neurocognitive function, consideration should be given to identifying the hippocampus as a critical organ at risk in the IMRT optimization process.
Authors: A W Lee; W Foo; R Chappell; J F Fowler; W M Sze; Y F Poon; S C Law; S H Ng; S K O; S Y Tung; W H Lau; J H Ho Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1998-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: P S Eriksson; E Perfilieva; T Björk-Eriksson; A M Alborn; C Nordborg; D A Peterson; F H Gage Journal: Nat Med Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jacob Raber; Radoslaw Rola; Anthony LeFevour; Duncan Morhardt; Justine Curley; Shinichiro Mizumatsu; Scott R VandenBerg; John R Fike Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Seung Won Seol; Brian H Lee; Timothy L Sita; Jay Ram Devineni; Tim J Kruser; Sean Sachdev; Michelle Gentile; Irene Helenowski; Bharat B Mittal Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-09-24
Authors: Sun Zong-Wen; Shi Lei; Li Qinglin; Kong Yue; Du Feng-Lei; Xie Tie-Ming; Hua Yong-Hong; Hu Qiao-Ying; Chen Xiao-Zhong; Chen Yuan-Yuan; Chen Ming Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 4.379