Literature DB >> 24619333

Effects of different pressure levels of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on liver regeneration after liver resection in a rat model.

Yoko Komori1, Yukio Iwashita, Masayuki Ohta, Yuichiro Kawano, Masafumi Inomata, Seigo Kitano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent study demonstrated that high pressure of carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum before liver resection impairs postoperative liver regeneration. This study was aimed to investigate effects of varying insufflation pressures of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on liver regeneration using a rat model.
METHODS: 180 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups: control group (without preoperative pneumoperitoneum), low-pressure group (with preoperative pneumoperitoneum at 5 mmHg), and high-pressure group (with preoperative pneumoperitoneum at 10 mmHg). After pneumoperitoneum, all rats were subjected to 70% partial hepatic resection and then euthanized at 0 min, 12 h, and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, 4, and 7. Following outcome parameters were used: liver regeneration (liver regeneration rate, mitotic count, Ki-67 labeling index), hepatocellular damage (serum aminotransferases), oxidative stress [serum malondialdehyde (MDA)], interleukin-6 (IL-6), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) expression in the liver tissue.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed for all parameters between control and low-pressure groups. The liver regeneration rate and mitotic count were significantly decreased in the high-pressure group than in control and low-pressure groups on PODs 2 and 4. Postoperative hepatocellular damage was significantly greater in the high-pressure group on PODs 1, 2, 4, and 7 compared with control and/or low-pressure groups. Serum MDA levels were significantly higher in the high-pressure group on PODs 1 and 2, and serum IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the high-pressure group at 12 h and on POD 1, compared with control and/or low-pressure groups. The HGF tissue expression was significantly lower in the high-pressure group at 12 h and on PODs 1 and 4, compared with that in control and/or low-pressure groups.
CONCLUSIONS: High-pressure pneumoperitoneum before 70% liver resection impairs postoperative liver regeneration, but low-pressure pneumoperitoneum has no adverse effects. This study suggests that following laparoscopic liver resection using appropriate pneumoperitoneum pressure, no impairment of liver regeneration occurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24619333     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3498-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  52 in total

1.  Laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Alan J Koffron; Mark J Thomas; Steven Rudich; Michael Abecassis; E Steve Woodle
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Gas embolism in laparoscopic hepatectomy: what is the optimal pneumoperitoneal pressure for laparoscopic major hepatectomy?

Authors:  Yuichiro Otsuka; Toshio Katagiri; Jun Ishii; Tetsuya Maeda; Yoshihisa Kubota; Akira Tamura; Masaru Tsuchiya; Hironori Kaneko
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 3.  Oxygen-free radicals at myocardial level: effects of ischaemia and reperfusion.

Authors:  R Ferrari
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Loss of physiologic hepatic blood flow control ("hepatic arterial buffer response") during CO2-pneumoperitoneum in the rat.

Authors:  S Richter; A Olinger; U Hildebrandt; M D Menger; B Vollmar
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Interleukin-6 in the injured patient. Marker of injury or mediator of inflammation?

Authors:  W L Biffl; E E Moore; F A Moore; V M Peterson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Ischemic preconditioning decreases laparoscopy induced oxidative stress in the liver.

Authors:  V Nesek-Adam; Z Rasić; D Vnuk; D Schwarz; D Rasić; D Crvenković
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2010-06

7.  The effect of gases in the intraperitoneal space on cytokine response and bacterial translocation in a rat model.

Authors:  T Matsumoto; S Tsuboi; B Dolgor; T Bandoh; T Yoshida; S Kitano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Signs of reperfusion injury following CO2 pneumoperitoneum: an in vivo microscopy study.

Authors:  Arash Nickkholgh; Miriam Barro-Bejarano; Rui Liang; Markus Zorn; Arianeb Mehrabi; Martha-Maria Gebhard; Markus W Büchler; Carsten N Gutt; Peter Schemmer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Gut ischemia, oxidative stress, and bacterial translocation in elevated abdominal pressure in rats.

Authors:  E Eleftheriadis; K Kotzampassi; K Papanotas; N Heliadis; K Sarris
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Use of robotics in liver donor right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Po-Da Chen; Chao-Yin Wu; Yao-Ming Wu
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Recent developments in in vitro and in vivo models for improved translation of preclinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics data.

Authors:  Jaydeep Yadav; Mehdi El Hassani; Jasleen Sodhi; Volker M Lauschke; Jessica H Hartman; Laura E Russell
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.984

3.  Impact of laparoscopic liver resection on liver regeneration.

Authors:  Yasuko Matsuo; Daisuke Hokuto; Satoshi Yasuda; Takahiro Yoshikawa; Naoki Kamitani; Shunsuke Doi; Kenji Nakagawa; Satoshi Nishiwada; Minako Nagai; Taichi Terai; Masayuki Sho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Assessment for the minimal invasiveness of laparoscopic liver resection by interleukin-6 and thrombospondin-1.

Authors:  Takayoshi Kaida; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Hiroki Sato; Shotaro Kinoshita; Takashi Matsumoto; Yuta Shiraishi; Yuki Kitano; Takaaki Higashi; Katsunori Imai; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.