PURPOSE: Functional studies have detected deficits in retinal signaling in asymptomatic children from families with inherited autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Whether retinal abnormalities are present earlier during gestation or shortly after birth in a subset of children with autosomal dominant RP is unknown and no appropriate animal RP model possessing visual function at birth has been available to examine this possibility. In a recently developed transgenic P23H (TgP23H) rhodopsin swine model of RP, we tracked changes in pre- and early postnatal retinal morphology, as well as early postnatal retinal function. METHODS: Domestic swine inseminated with semen from a TgP23H miniswine founder produced TgP23H hybrid and wild type (Wt) littermates. Outer retinal morphology was assessed at light and electron microscopic levels between embryonic (E) and postnatal (P) day E85 to P3. Retinal function was evaluated using the full field electroretinogram at P3. RESULTS: Embryonic TgP23H rod photoreceptors are malformed and their rhodopsin expression pattern is abnormal. Consistent with morphological abnormalities, rod-driven function is absent at P3. In contrast, TgP23H and Wt cone photoreceptor morphology (E85-P3) and cone-driven retinal function (P3) are similar. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal expression of mutant rhodopsin alters the normal morphological and functional development of rod photoreceptors in TgP23H swine embryos. Despite this significant change, cone photoreceptors are unaffected. Human infants with similarly aggressive RP might never have rod vision, although cone vision would be unaffected. Such aggressive forms of RP in preverbal children would require early intervention to delay or prevent functional blindness.
PURPOSE: Functional studies have detected deficits in retinal signaling in asymptomatic children from families with inherited autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Whether retinal abnormalities are present earlier during gestation or shortly after birth in a subset of children with autosomal dominant RP is unknown and no appropriate animal RP model possessing visual function at birth has been available to examine this possibility. In a recently developed transgenic P23H (TgP23H) rhodopsinswine model of RP, we tracked changes in pre- and early postnatal retinal morphology, as well as early postnatal retinal function. METHODS: Domestic swine inseminated with semen from a TgP23H miniswine founder produced TgP23H hybrid and wild type (Wt) littermates. Outer retinal morphology was assessed at light and electron microscopic levels between embryonic (E) and postnatal (P) day E85 to P3. Retinal function was evaluated using the full field electroretinogram at P3. RESULTS: Embryonic TgP23H rod photoreceptors are malformed and their rhodopsin expression pattern is abnormal. Consistent with morphological abnormalities, rod-driven function is absent at P3. In contrast, TgP23H and Wt cone photoreceptor morphology (E85-P3) and cone-driven retinal function (P3) are similar. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal expression of mutant rhodopsin alters the normal morphological and functional development of rod photoreceptors in TgP23H swine embryos. Despite this significant change, cone photoreceptors are unaffected. Humaninfants with similarly aggressive RP might never have rod vision, although cone vision would be unaffected. Such aggressive forms of RP in preverbal children would require early intervention to delay or prevent functional blindness.
Entities:
Keywords:
electron microscopy; electroretinography; photoreceptor morphology; retinitis pigmentosa; swine
Authors: Juan P Fernandez de Castro; Patrick A Scott; James W Fransen; James Demas; Paul J DeMarco; Henry J Kaplan; Maureen A McCall Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Adewumi N Adekunle; Alice Adkins; Wei Wang; Henry J Kaplan; Juan Fernandez de Castro; Sang Joon Lee; Philip Huie; Daniel Palanker; Maureen McCall; Machelle T Pardue Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Wei Wang; Sang Joon Lee; Patrick A Scott; Xiaoqin Lu; Douglas Emery; Yongqin Liu; Toshihiko Ezashi; Michael R Roberts; Jason W Ross; Henry J Kaplan; Douglas C Dean Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Juan P Fernandez de Castro; Patrick A Scott; James W Fransen; James Demas; Paul J DeMarco; Henry J Kaplan; Maureen A McCall Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Wankun Xie; Min Zhao; Shu-Huai Tsai; William L Burkes; Luke B Potts; Wenjuan Xu; H Ross Payne; Travis W Hein; Lih Kuo; Robert H Rosa Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Sarag Abhari; Michael Eisenback; Henry J Kaplan; Eric Walters; Randall S Prather; Patrick A Scott Journal: Anat Rec (Hoboken) Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 2.064
Authors: Qingxian Lu; Patrick A Scott; Eric V Vukmanic; Henry J Kaplan; Douglas C Dean; Qiutang Li Journal: FASEB J Date: 2020-03-29 Impact factor: 5.191