OBJECTIVES: Both patients with pediatric bipolar disorder (BD) and unaffected youth at familial risk (AR) for the illness show impairments in face emotion labeling. Few studies, however, have examined brain regions engaged in AR youth when processing emotional faces. Moreover, studies have yet to explore neural responsiveness to subtle changes in face emotion in AR youth. METHODS: Sixty-four unrelated youth, including 20 patients with BD, 15 unaffected AR youth, and 29 healthy comparisons (HC), completed functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neutral faces were morphed with angry or happy faces in 25% intervals. In specific phases of the task, youth alternatively made explicit (hostility) or implicit (nose width) ratings of the faces. The slope of blood oxygenated level-dependent activity was calculated across neutral to angry and neutral to happy face stimuli. RESULTS: Behaviorally, both subjects with BD (p ≤ 0.001) and AR youth (p ≤ 0.05) rated faces as less hostile relative to HC. Consistent with this, in response to increasing anger on the face, patients with BD and AR youth showed decreased modulation in the amygdala and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG; BA 46) compared to HC (all p ≤ 0.05). Amygdala dysfunction was present across both implicit and explicit rating conditions, but IFG modulation deficits were specific to the explicit condition. With increasing happiness, AR youth showed aberrant modulation in the IFG, which was also sensitive to task demands (all p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased amygdala and IFG modulation in patients with BD and AR youth may be pathophysiological risk markers for BD, and may underlie the social cognition and face emotion labeling deficits observed in BD and AR youth. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
OBJECTIVES: Both patients with pediatric bipolar disorder (BD) and unaffected youth at familial risk (AR) for the illness show impairments in face emotion labeling. Few studies, however, have examined brain regions engaged in AR youth when processing emotional faces. Moreover, studies have yet to explore neural responsiveness to subtle changes in face emotion in AR youth. METHODS: Sixty-four unrelated youth, including 20 patients with BD, 15 unaffected AR youth, and 29 healthy comparisons (HC), completed functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neutral faces were morphed with angry or happy faces in 25% intervals. In specific phases of the task, youth alternatively made explicit (hostility) or implicit (nose width) ratings of the faces. The slope of blood oxygenated level-dependent activity was calculated across neutral to angry and neutral to happy face stimuli. RESULTS: Behaviorally, both subjects with BD (p ≤ 0.001) and AR youth (p ≤ 0.05) rated faces as less hostile relative to HC. Consistent with this, in response to increasing anger on the face, patients with BD and AR youth showed decreased modulation in the amygdala and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG; BA 46) compared to HC (all p ≤ 0.05). Amygdala dysfunction was present across both implicit and explicit rating conditions, but IFG modulation deficits were specific to the explicit condition. With increasing happiness, AR youth showed aberrant modulation in the IFG, which was also sensitive to task demands (all p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Decreased amygdala and IFG modulation in patients with BD and AR youth may be pathophysiological risk markers for BD, and may underlie the social cognition and face emotion labeling deficits observed in BD and AR youth. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
at risk; bipolar disorder; face emotion; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); parametric modulation
Authors: Hilary P Blumberg; Nelson H Donegan; Charles A Sanislow; Susan Collins; Cheryl Lacadie; Pawel Skudlarski; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Robert K Fulbright; Thomas H McGlashan; John C Gore; John H Krystal Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Laura A Thomas; Melissa A Brotman; Eli J Muhrer; Brooke H Rosen; Brian L Bones; Richard C Reynolds; Christen M Deveney; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2012-12
Authors: Amanda E Guyer; Erin B McClure; Abby D Adler; Melissa A Brotman; Brendan A Rich; Alane S Kimes; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Amy S Garrett; Allan L Reiss; Meghan E Howe; Ryan G Kelley; Manpreet K Singh; Nancy E Adleman; Asya Karchemskiy; Kiki D Chang Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Rebecca Kerestes; Anna Maria Segreti; Lisa A Pan; Mary L Phillips; Boris Birmaher; David A Brent; Cecile D Ladouceur Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Anna Manelis; Cecile D Ladouceur; Simona Graur; Kelly Monk; Lisa K Bonar; Mary Beth Hickey; Amanda C Dwojak; David Axelson; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Genna Bebko; Michele A Bertocci; Danella M Hafeman; Mary Kay Gill; Boris Birmaher; Mary L Phillips Journal: Brain Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: G Roberts; A Perry; A Lord; A Frankland; V Leung; E Holmes-Preston; F Levy; R K Lenroot; P B Mitchell; M Breakspear Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 15.992