Literature DB >> 24617446

Clinical outcomes of nalidixic acid, ceftriaxone, and multidrug-resistant nontyphoidal salmonella infections compared with pansusceptible infections in FoodNet sites, 2006-2008.

Amy L Krueger1, Sharon A Greene, Ezra J Barzilay, Olga Henao, Duc Vugia, Samir Hanna, Stephanie Meyer, Kirk Smith, Gary Pecic, Dina Hoefer, Patricia M Griffin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nontyphoidal Salmonella causes an estimated 1.2 million infections, 23,000 hospitalizations, and 450 deaths annually in the United States. Most illnesses are self-limited; however, treatment with antimicrobial agents can be life-saving for invasive infections.
METHODS: The Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network and the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System collaborated on a prospective cohort study of patients with nontyphoidal Salmonella bloodstream and gastrointestinal infections to determine differences in the clinical outcomes of resistant compared with pansusceptible infections. Interviews were conducted within 85 days of specimen collection date.
RESULTS: Of 875 nontyphoidal Salmonella isolates, 705 (81%) were pansusceptible, 165 (19%) were resistant to at least 1 agent, and 5 (0.6%) had only intermediate resistance. The most common pattern, found in 51 (31%) of resistant isolates, was resistance to at least ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, and tetracycline (ACSSuT); 88% of isolates with this pattern were serotype Typhimurium or Newport. Fourteen (52%) of the 27 ceftriaxone-resistant isolates were also ACSSuT resistant. Adjusted for age and serotype, bloodstream infection was significantly more common among patients infected with strains resistant to only two, only three, or only five antimicrobial classes, to ACSSuT with or without other agents, to ACSSuT only, or to nalidixic acid with or without other agents than among patients with pansusceptible isolates. Adjusted for age, serotype, and bloodstream infection, hospitalization was significantly more common among patients infected with strains resistant to only three agents or to ceftriaxone (all ceftriaxone-resistant isolates were resistant to other agents) than among patients with pansusceptible isolates.
CONCLUSION: This study extends evidence that patients with antimicrobial-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella infections have more severe outcomes. Prevention efforts are needed to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial use in patient care settings and in food animals to help prevent the emergence of resistance and infections with resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24617446     DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis        ISSN: 1535-3141            Impact factor:   3.171


  20 in total

1.  Using Machine Learning To Predict Antimicrobial MICs and Associated Genomic Features for Nontyphoidal Salmonella.

Authors:  Marcus Nguyen; S Wesley Long; Patrick F McDermott; Randall J Olsen; Robert Olson; Rick L Stevens; Gregory H Tyson; Shaohua Zhao; James J Davis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Increased Incidence of Antimicrobial-Resistant Nontyphoidal Salmonella Infections, United States, 2004-2016.

Authors:  Felicita Medalla; Weidong Gu; Cindy R Friedman; Michael Judd; Jason Folster; Patricia M Griffin; Robert M Hoekstra
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 6.883

3.  Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella that caused foodborne disease outbreaks: United States, 2003-2012.

Authors:  A C Brown; J E Grass; L C Richardson; A L Nisler; A S Bicknese; L H Gould
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network-2 Decades of Achievements, 1996-2015.

Authors:  Olga L Henao; Timothy F Jones; Duc J Vugia; Patricia M Griffin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 5.  Same species, different diseases: how and why typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars differ.

Authors:  Ohad Gal-Mor; Erin C Boyle; Guntram A Grassl
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Estimated Incidence of Antimicrobial Drug-Resistant Nontyphoidal Salmonella Infections, United States, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Felicita Medalla; Weidong Gu; Barbara E Mahon; Michael Judd; Jason Folster; Patricia M Griffin; Robert M Hoekstra
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Whole genome sequencing-based detection of antimicrobial resistance and virulence in non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica isolated from wildlife.

Authors:  Milton Thomas; Gavin John Fenske; Linto Antony; Sudeep Ghimire; Ronald Welsh; Akhilesh Ramachandran; Joy Scaria
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.181

Review 8.  Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?

Authors:  Karin Hoelzer; Nora Wong; Joe Thomas; Kathy Talkington; Elizabeth Jungman; Allan Coukell
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Distribution of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes across Salmonella enterica Isolates from Animal and Nonanimal Foods.

Authors:  J B Pettengill; H Tate; K Gensheimer; C H Hsu; J Ihrie; A O Markon; P F McDERMOTT; S Zhao; E Strain; M C Bazaco
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.745

10.  Effect of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Tests on Future Emerging Infections Program Surveillance.

Authors:  Gayle Langley; John Besser; Martha Iwamoto; Fernanda C Lessa; Alicia Cronquist; Tami H Skoff; Sandra Chaves; Dave Boxrud; Robert W Pinner; Lee H Harrison
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.