Literature DB >> 24615720

The clinical results of the Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review.

J Hallet1, H Milot, S Drolet, E Desrosiers, R C Grégoire, A Bouchard.   

Abstract

Turnbull and Cutait described abdominoperineal pull-through followed by delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCA) in 1961. DCA could reduce anastomotic leaks, pelvic morbidity and use of stomas. Strong evidence about its clinical benefits is still lacking. This systematic review examined the clinical outcomes of DCA for the treatment of malignant or benign colorectal conditions. A systematic search of electronic medical databases was conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcome was pelvic morbidity (anastomotic leak, pelvic abscess or sepsis, use of stoma). Fecal continence and survival data were also analyzed. From 1,251 citations, we included seven observational studies including 1,124 patients. All included studies were considered at high risk of bias. Two studies comparing DCA with immediate anastomosis reported a significant decrease in anastomotic leak, and pelvic abscess or sepsis. Low rates of pelvic morbidity were reported in the other five studies: anastomotic leak 0-7 %, pelvic abscess 0-11.8 % and pelvic sepsis 6.8-10 %. Rates of permanent stoma after DCA were low in six studies (1-6 %), with one study reporting an incidence of 25 %. Fecal continence was reported as satisfying in all studies. No differences were observed in a comparative setting. Survival data were reported in four studies. Clinical heterogeneity and methodological issues precluded meta-analysis. Based on retrospective evidence, DCA offers a low rate of anastomotic leak, pelvic morbidity and use of stoma, with reasonable fecal continence. Results are encouraging, but prospective studies are needed for comparison with standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615720     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1132-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  37 in total

1.  Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients.

Authors:  M T Eriksen; A Wibe; J Norstein; J Haffner; J N Wiig
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Measured radical gastrectomy; review of 505 operations for peptic ulcer.

Authors:  A H VISICK
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1948-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Coloanal sleeve anastomosis (Soave procedure): the ultimate treatment option for complex rectourinary fistulas.

Authors:  Mircea Chirica; Yann Parc; Emmanuel Tiret; Nidal Dehni; Deborah McNamara; Rolland Parc
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Abdominoperineal endoanal pull-through resection. A comparative study between immediate and delayed colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  D E Cutait; R Cutait; M Ioshimoto; J Hyppólito da Silva; A Manzione
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Graham Branagan; Derek Finnis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection with transanal colonic pull-through and delayed coloanal anastomosis: a new approach to adult Hirschsprung disease.

Authors:  Julien Jarry; Jean-Luc Faucheron
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Functional results of delayed coloanal anastomosis after preoperative radiotherapy for lower third rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Olagne; J Baulieux; E de la Roche; M Adham; N Berthoux; O Bourdeix; J P Gerard; C Ducerf
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Walker; Stephen W Bell; Matthew J F X Rickard; Daniel Mehanna; Owen F Dent; Pierre H Chapuis; E Leslie Bokey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pullthrough operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer.

Authors:  W O Kirwan; R B Turnbull; V W Fazio; F L Weakley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  10 in total

1.  A pull-through delayed "high" coloanal anastomosis: new tricks to refresh an old procedure.

Authors:  F Bianco; S De Franciscis; A Belli; V Ragone; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis with protective loop ileostomy for low rectal cancer. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Turnbull-BCN).

Authors:  Sebastiano Biondo; Loris Trenti; Ana Galvez; Eloy Espin-Basany; Francesco Bianco; Giovanni Romano; Esther Kreisler
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  "Scarless" and no-stoma surgery for low rectal cancer: the laparoscopic pull-through delayed "high" colo-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Andrea Belli; Silvia De Franciscis; Armando Falato; Giovanni Maria Romano
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-04-04

4.  Delayed Colo-anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: Pelvic Morbidity, Functional Results and Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Portale; George Octavian Popesc; Matteo Parotto; Francesco Cavallin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic delayed coloanal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy for low rectal cancer surgery: 85 consecutive patients from a single institution.

Authors:  P-Y Sage; B Trilling; P-A Waroquet; D Voirin; E Girard; J-L Faucheron
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Anastomotic salvage after rectal cancer resection using the Turnbull-Cutait delayed anastomosis.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Alexandre Bouchard; Sébastien Drolet; Hélène Milot; Emilie Desrosiers; Aude Lebrun; Roger Charles Grégoire
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C La Raja; C Foppa; A Maroli; C Kontovounisios; N Ben David; M Carvello; A Spinelli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.699

8.  Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection: indications and results.

Authors:  Dario Scala; Antonello Niglio; Ugo Pace; Fulvio Ruffolo; Daniela Rega; Paolo Delrio
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-03-29

9.  Short stump and high anastomosis pull-through (SHiP) procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis with no protective stoma for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Paola Incollingo; Armando Falato; Silvia De Franciscis; Andrea Belli; Fabio Carbone; Gaetano Gallo; Mario Fusco; Giovanni Maria Romano
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-03-16

10.  Turnbull-Cutait technique without ileostomy after total mesorectal excision is associated with acceptably low early post-operative morbidity.

Authors:  Osman Serhat Guner; Latif Volkan Tumay
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 1.872

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.