Literature DB >> 24615380

Reasons for non-participation in population-based abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.

A Linne1, K Leander, D Lindström, S Törnberg, R Hultgren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A population-based screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) started in 2010 in Stockholm County, Sweden. This present study used individual data from Sweden's extensive healthcare registries to identify the reasons for non-participation in the AAA screening programme.
METHODS: All 65-year-old men in Stockholm are invited to screening for AAA; this study included all men invited from July 2010 to July 2012. Participants and non-participants were compared for socioeconomic factors, travel distance to the examination centre and healthcare use. The influence of these factors on participation was analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.
RESULTS: The participation rate for AAA screening was 77·6 per cent (18 876 of 24 319 men invited). The prevalence of AAA (aortic diameter more than 2·9 cm) among participants was 1·4 per cent. The most important reasons for non-participation in the multivariable regression analyses were: recent immigration (within 5 years) (odds ratio (OR) 3·25, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·94 to 5·47), low income (OR 2·76, 2·46 to 3·10), marital status single or divorced (OR 2·23, 2·08 to 2·39), low level of education (OR 1·28, 1·16 to 1·40) and long travel distance (OR 1·23, 1·10 to 1·37). Non-participants had a higher incidence of stroke (4·5 versus 2·8 per cent; P < 0·001) and chronic pulmonary disease (2·9 versus 1·3 per cent; P < 0·001). Daily smoking was more common in residential areas where the participation rate for AAA screening was low.
CONCLUSION: Efforts to improve participation in AAA screening should target the groups with low income, a low level of education and immigrants. The higher morbidity in the non-participant group, together with a higher rate of smoking, make it probable that this group also has a high risk of AAA.
© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615380     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  5 in total

1.  Do Non-participants at Screening have a Different Threshold for an Acceptable Benefit-Harm Ratio than Participants? Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Tina Birgitte Hansen; Jes Sanddal Lindholt; Axel Diederichsen; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Oral glucose tolerance testing as a complement to fasting plasma glucose in screening for type 2 diabetes: population-based cross-sectional analyses of 146 000 health examinations in Västerbotten, Sweden.

Authors:  Anna Rosén; Julia Otten; Andreas Stomby; Simon Vallin; Patrik Wennberg; Mattias Brunström
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Symptoms of Depression and Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A HUNT Study.

Authors:  Linn Åldstedt Nyrønning; Malin Stenman; Rebecka Hultgren; Grethe Albrektsen; Vibeke Videm; Erney Mattsson
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  A Majority of Admitted Patients With Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Undergo and Survive Corrective Treatment: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  R Hultgren; Sayid Zommorodi; Moa Gambe; Joy Roy
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Drug utilization in the Maastricht Study: A comparison with nationwide data.

Authors:  Johannes T H Nielen; Johanna H M Driessen; Pieter C Dagnelie; Annelies Boonen; Bart van den Bemt; Hein A W van Onzenoort; Cees Neef; Ronald M A Henry; Andrea M Burden; Simone J S Sep; Carla J van der Kallen; Miranda T Schram; Nicolaas Schaper; Coen D A Stehouwer; Luc Smits; Frank de Vries
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.