Literature DB >> 24614966

The resurrection of Tweedledum and Tweedledee: bimodality cannot distinguish serial and parallel processes.

Paul Williams1, Ami Eidels, James T Townsend.   

Abstract

Simultaneously presented signals may be processed in serial or in parallel. One potentially valuable indicator of a system's characteristics may be the appearance of multimodality in the response time (RT) distributions. It is known that standard serial models can predict multimodal RT distributions, but it is unknown whether multimodality is diagnostic of serial systems, or whether alternative architectures, such as parallel ones, can also make such predictions. We demonstrate via simulations that a multimodal RT distribution is not sufficient by itself to rule out parallel self-terminating processing, even with limited trial numbers. These predictions are discussed within the context of recent data indicating the existence of multimodal distributions in visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24614966     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0599-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.

Authors:  M Carrasco; B McElree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory and method.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Attention alters decision criteria but not appearance: a reanalysis of Anton-Erxleben, Abrams, and Carrasco (2010).

Authors:  Keith A Schneider
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Maas Mollenhauer; Alexander Rösler; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement.

Authors:  J Duncan; G Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision.

Authors:  J-M Hopf; C N Boehler; S J Luck; J K Tsotsos; H-J Heinze; M A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance.

Authors:  Keith A Schneider; Marcell Komlos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Rick Dale
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-03

9.  Features and objects: the fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1988-05

10.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.

Authors:  Rani Moran; Michael Zehetleitner; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Theta-Gamma Coding Meets Communication-through-Coherence: Neuronal Oscillatory Multiplexing Theories Reconciled.

Authors:  Douglas McLelland; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.