PURPOSE: To test meniscal mechanical properties such as the dynamic modulus of elasticity E* and the loss angle δ at two loading frequencies ω at different locations of the menisci and compare it to E* and δ of hyaline cartilage in indentation mode with spherical indenters. METHODS: On nine pairs of human menisci, the dynamic E*-modulus and loss angle δ (as a measure of the energy dissipation) were determined. The measurements were performed at two different strain rates (slow sinusoidal and fast single impact) to show the strain rate dependence of the material. The measurements were compared to previous similar measurements with the same equipment on human hyaline cartilage. RESULTS: The resultant E* at fast indentation (median 1.16 MPa) was significantly higher, and the loss angle was significantly lower (median 10.2°) compared to slow-loading mode's E* and δ (median 0.18 MPa and 16.9°, respectively). Further, significant differences for different locations are shown. On the medial meniscus, the anterior horn shows the highest resultant dynamic modulus. CONCLUSION: In dynamic measurements with a spherical indenter, the menisci are much softer and less energy-dissipating than hyaline cartilage. Further, the menisci are stiffer and less energy-dissipating in the middle, intermediate part compared to the meniscal base. In compression, the energy dissipation of meniscus cartilage plays a minor role compared to hyaline cartilage. At high impacts, energy dissipation is less than on low impacts, similar to cartilage.
PURPOSE: To test meniscal mechanical properties such as the dynamic modulus of elasticity E* and the loss angle δ at two loading frequencies ω at different locations of the menisci and compare it to E* and δ of hyaline cartilage in indentation mode with spherical indenters. METHODS: On nine pairs of human menisci, the dynamic E*-modulus and loss angle δ (as a measure of the energy dissipation) were determined. The measurements were performed at two different strain rates (slow sinusoidal and fast single impact) to show the strain rate dependence of the material. The measurements were compared to previous similar measurements with the same equipment on humanhyaline cartilage. RESULTS: The resultant E* at fast indentation (median 1.16 MPa) was significantly higher, and the loss angle was significantly lower (median 10.2°) compared to slow-loading mode's E* and δ (median 0.18 MPa and 16.9°, respectively). Further, significant differences for different locations are shown. On the medial meniscus, the anterior horn shows the highest resultant dynamic modulus. CONCLUSION: In dynamic measurements with a spherical indenter, the menisci are much softer and less energy-dissipating than hyaline cartilage. Further, the menisci are stiffer and less energy-dissipating in the middle, intermediate part compared to the meniscal base. In compression, the energy dissipation of meniscus cartilage plays a minor role compared to hyaline cartilage. At high impacts, energy dissipation is less than on low impacts, similar to cartilage.
Authors: Vincent J Baro; Edward D Bonnevie; Xiaohan Lai; Christopher Price; David L Burris; Liyun Wang Journal: Bone Date: 2012-03-17 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Gunther H Sandmann; Christopher Adamczyk; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Stefan Doebele; Andreas Buettner; Stefan Milz; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Vogt; Rainer Burgkart; Thomas Tischer Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-11-17 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Massimiliano De Rosa; Giovanni Filippone; Thomas M Best; Alicia R Jackson; Francesco Travascio Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Date: 2022-01-05
Authors: Andreas M Seitz; Jonas Schwer; Luisa de Roy; Daniela Warnecke; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-03-17