Literature DB >> 24614927

Fibrous cartilage of human menisci is less shock-absorbing and energy-dissipating than hyaline cartilage.

Mario Gaugler1, Dieter Wirz, Sarah Ronken, Mirjam Hafner, Beat Göpfert, Niklaus F Friederich, Reinhard Elke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test meniscal mechanical properties such as the dynamic modulus of elasticity E* and the loss angle δ at two loading frequencies ω at different locations of the menisci and compare it to E* and δ of hyaline cartilage in indentation mode with spherical indenters.
METHODS: On nine pairs of human menisci, the dynamic E*-modulus and loss angle δ (as a measure of the energy dissipation) were determined. The measurements were performed at two different strain rates (slow sinusoidal and fast single impact) to show the strain rate dependence of the material. The measurements were compared to previous similar measurements with the same equipment on human hyaline cartilage.
RESULTS: The resultant E* at fast indentation (median 1.16 MPa) was significantly higher, and the loss angle was significantly lower (median 10.2°) compared to slow-loading mode's E* and δ (median 0.18 MPa and 16.9°, respectively). Further, significant differences for different locations are shown. On the medial meniscus, the anterior horn shows the highest resultant dynamic modulus.
CONCLUSION: In dynamic measurements with a spherical indenter, the menisci are much softer and less energy-dissipating than hyaline cartilage. Further, the menisci are stiffer and less energy-dissipating in the middle, intermediate part compared to the meniscal base. In compression, the energy dissipation of meniscus cartilage plays a minor role compared to hyaline cartilage. At high impacts, energy dissipation is less than on low impacts, similar to cartilage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24614927     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2926-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  15 in total

Review 1.  Function of the normal meniscus and consequences of meniscal resection.

Authors:  H Aagaard; R Verdonk
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Comparison of biochemical characteristics of cultured fibrochondrocytes isolated from the inner and outer regions of human meniscus.

Authors:  T Tanaka; K Fujii; Y Kumagae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Experimental and biphasic FEM determinations of the material properties and hydraulic permeability of the meniscus in tension.

Authors:  Michelle A LeRoux; Lori A Setton
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  The shocking truth about meniscus.

Authors:  Stephen Andrews; Nigel Shrive; Janet Ronsky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Methodology and apparatus to determine material properties of the knee joint meniscus.

Authors:  D J Goertzen; D R Budney; J G Cinats
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Functional characterization of normal and degraded bovine meniscus: rate-dependent indentation and friction studies.

Authors:  Vincent J Baro; Edward D Bonnevie; Xiaohan Lai; Christopher Price; David L Burris; Liyun Wang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Distribution of type I, II, III and V in the pepsin solubilized collagens in bovine menisci.

Authors:  H S Cheung
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.417

8.  Finite element analysis of the effect of meniscal tears and meniscectomies on human knee biomechanics.

Authors:  E Peña; B Calvo; M A Martínez; D Palanca; M Doblaré
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans from different zones of the porcine knee meniscus.

Authors:  T Nakano; C M Dodd; P G Scott
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Biomechanical comparison of menisci from different species and artificial constructs.

Authors:  Gunther H Sandmann; Christopher Adamczyk; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Stefan Doebele; Andreas Buettner; Stefan Milz; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Vogt; Rainer Burgkart; Thomas Tischer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mechanisms of energy dissipation and relationship with tissue composition in human meniscus.

Authors:  A Morejon; A M A Mantero; T M Best; A R Jackson; F Travascio
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Vibrometry as a noncontact alternative to dynamic and viscoelastic mechanical testing in cartilage.

Authors:  M Gabriela Espinosa; Gaston A Otarola; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Mechanical properties of meniscal circumferential fibers using an inverse finite element analysis approach.

Authors:  Massimiliano De Rosa; Giovanni Filippone; Thomas M Best; Alicia R Jackson; Francesco Travascio
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2022-01-05

4.  Knee Joint Menisci Are Shock Absorbers: A Biomechanical In-Vitro Study on Porcine Stifle Joints.

Authors:  Andreas M Seitz; Jonas Schwer; Luisa de Roy; Daniela Warnecke; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-17

Review 5.  Evolution of knowledge on meniscal biomechanics: a 40 year perspective.

Authors:  Amin Mohamadi; Kaveh Momenzadeh; Arun Ramappa; Joseph P DeAngelis; Ara Nazarian; Aidin Masoudi; Kempland C Walley; Kenny Ierardi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Numerical Modeling of Shockwave Treatment of Knee Joint.

Authors:  Galina Eremina; Alexey Smolin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.