Literature DB >> 24614607

Transthoracic echocardiography in pediatric intensive care: impact on medical and surgical management.

Shelby Kutty1, Jonah E Attebery, Emily M Yeager, Swetha Natarajan, Ling Li, Qinghai Peng, Edward Truemper, James M Hammel, David A Danford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although transthoracic echocardiography is commonly performed in the PICU, its utility is not specifically known. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the clinical impact of echocardiography in the PICU in terms of frequency of unanticipated findings and the frequency and nature of clinical management changes attributed to the results of echocardiography.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Nineteen-bed combined medical-surgical-cardiac PICU at a tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: All patients in PICU undergoing transthoracic echocardiography. INTERVENTIONS, MEASUREMENTS, AND MAIN
RESULTS: Data collected included echocardiography indications, pre-echocardiography clinical assessment of anticipated echocardiography findings, height, weight, primary diagnosis, age, and urgency (stat vs routine) of echocardiography. Input of the attending care team (intensivist, cardiologist, and/or cardiovascular surgeon) allowed classification of echocardiography results as either confirming the pre-echocardiography impression, altering the pre-echocardiography clinical impression regarding the indication for which the test was performed, or altering the impression by virtue of new findings unrelated to the specific indication. The nature of the new findings were recorded and categorized. The team recorded clinical management changes made in response to the echocardiography results; the nature of these were listed and categorized. Echocardiograms (n = 416) were performed in 132 patients. Of these, 244 echocardiograms (59%) were ordered on male patients, 31% were under 30 days old, median age was 103 days, 379 (91%) had a primary cardiac diagnosis, and 92 (22%) were ordered stat. Sixty-three percent of echocardiograms confirmed and 24% altered the pre-echocardiography impression regarding the indication for the echocardiography; 13% introduced new findings unrelated to the indication. Cardiac surgical revision was the management change required in 26 patients (6.3%). Stat echocardiography was more likely to alter the pre-echocardiography assessment than routine echocardiography (p < 0.001). Management changes were more commonly associated with stat echocardiograms (p = 0.002) and those with new unexpected findings (p < 0.001) but had no demonstrable association with age less than 30 days (p = 0.332).
CONCLUSIONS: Unanticipated echocardiography results are common in the PICU, and they often alter the clinical impressions that prompted the echocardiogram or introduce new findings unrelated to the reason for which the echocardiogram was recorded. Clinical management changes attributable to echocardiography findings are frequent in the PICU, including occasional surgical intervention. Echocardiography adds diagnostic value and contributes to the management approach in the PICU, accounting for its frequent use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24614607     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  7 in total

1.  Perioperative point of care ultrasound in pediatric anesthesiology: a case series highlighting real-time intraoperative diagnosis and alteration of management augmenting physical examination.

Authors:  Adam C Adler; Arvind Chandrakantan; Frederick T Conlin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Assessment of limited chest x-ray technique in postcardiac surgery management.

Authors:  Mehrdad Salehi; Kianoush Saberi; Mehrzad Rahmanian; Ali Reza Bakhshandeh; Shahnaz Sharifi
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

3.  Clinical impact and efficacy of bedside echocardiography on patient management in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs): A prospective study.

Authors:  Sanliay Şahin; Mutlu Uysal Yazıcı; Ganime Ayar; Tülin Köksal; İbrahim İlker Çetin; Filiz Ekici; Abdullah Kocabaş
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 4.  Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Luke Burton; Vidit Bhargava; Michele Kong
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  Establishing a risk assessment framework for point-of-care ultrasound.

Authors:  Thomas W Conlon; Nadya Yousef; Juan Mayordomo-Colunga; Cecile Tissot; Maria V Fraga; Shazia Bhombal; Pradeep Suryawanshi; Alberto Medina Villanueva; Bijan Siassi; Yogen Singh
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Unanticipated critical findings on echocardiography in septic patients.

Authors:  Sarah J Beesley; Ezekiel Egan; Michael J Lanspa; Emily L Wilson; Elliotte L Hirshberg; Colin K Grissom; Rebecca Burk; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2020-04-02

Review 7.  Perioperative Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Children.

Authors:  Karen Boretsky
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.