Leslie A Marino1, Lisa B Dixon. 1. aDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University bCenter for Practice Innovations, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is an effective intervention for helping people with severe mental illness obtain competitive employment, yet it has not been widely implemented. This review will examine and summarize the latest research on IPS. RECENT FINDINGS: As the effectiveness of IPS has been well established in the literature, newer research is exploring nonvocational outcomes, such as quality of life and mental health services utilization and expanding the reach of IPS to include different countries and different population groups. There is also a growing literature exploring the cost-effectiveness of IPS compared with traditional vocational services, which has favored IPS. By far, the area of research that has expanded the most is aimed at enhancing IPS outcomes, at both the intervention level and the client level. Researchers are exploring the variance in IPS outcomes as a means of increasing competitive employment rates with IPS. SUMMARY: Although the field of research continues to expand, it is clear that many barriers remain to broad implementation of IPS. The solution goes beyond further research and involves policies and practices that support a recovery oriented mental healthcare system.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is an effective intervention for helping people with severe mental illness obtain competitive employment, yet it has not been widely implemented. This review will examine and summarize the latest research on IPS. RECENT FINDINGS: As the effectiveness of IPS has been well established in the literature, newer research is exploring nonvocational outcomes, such as quality of life and mental health services utilization and expanding the reach of IPS to include different countries and different population groups. There is also a growing literature exploring the cost-effectiveness of IPS compared with traditional vocational services, which has favored IPS. By far, the area of research that has expanded the most is aimed at enhancing IPS outcomes, at both the intervention level and the client level. Researchers are exploring the variance in IPS outcomes as a means of increasing competitive employment rates with IPS. SUMMARY: Although the field of research continues to expand, it is clear that many barriers remain to broad implementation of IPS. The solution goes beyond further research and involves policies and practices that support a recovery oriented mental healthcare system.
Authors: Martin Knapp; Anita Patel; Claire Curran; Eric Latimer; Jocelyn Catty; Thomas Becker; Robert E Drake; Angelo Fioritti; Reinhold Kilian; Christoph Lauber; Wulf Rössler; Toma Tomov; Jooske van Busschbach; Adelina Comas-Herrera; Sarah White; Durk Wiersma; Tom Burns Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Tom Burns; Jocelyn Catty; Thomas Becker; Robert E Drake; Angelo Fioritti; Martin Knapp; Christoph Lauber; Wulf Rössler; Toma Tomov; Jooske van Busschbach; Sarah White; Durk Wiersma Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-09-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Yoshihiro Kinoshita; Toshi A Furukawa; Kuni Kinoshita; Mina Honyashiki; Ichiro M Omori; Max Marshall; Gary R Bond; Peter Huxley; Naoji Amano; David Kingdon Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-09-13
Authors: M Martin-Carrasco; S Evans-Lacko; G Dom; N G Christodoulou; J Samochowiec; E González-Fraile; P Bienkowski; M Gómez-Beneyto; M J H Dos Santos; D Wasserman Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Emma E McGinty; Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Sarah Linden; Seema Choksy; Elizabeth Stone; Gail L Daumit Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Christoph U Correll; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Stefan Leucht; Anne Karow; Nadja Maric; Carmen Moreno; Merete Nordentoft; Andrea Raballo Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 2.570