Literature DB >> 24613515

Evaluation of accuracy of FAD-GDH- and mutant Q-GDH-based blood glucose monitors in multi-patient populations.

Ta-Yu Huang1, Hui-Wen Chang2, Mei-Fen Tsao2, Shu-Ming Chuang1, Chih-Chin Ni1, Jun-Wei Sue1, Hsiu-Chen Lin3, Cheng-Teng Hsu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucose dehydrogenases have been highly promoted to high-accuracy blood glucose (BG) monitors. The flavin adenine dinucleotide glucose dehydrogenase (FAD-GDH) and mutant variant of quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase (Mut. Q-GDH) are widely used in high-performance BG monitors for multi-patient use. Therefore we conducted accuracy evaluation of the GDH monitors, FAD-GDH-based GM700 and Mut. Q-GDH-based Performa.
METHODS: Different patients were enrolled: patients with and without diabetes, patients receiving respiratory therapies, hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and neonates. The accuracy evaluation of FAD-GDH- and Mut. Q-GDH-based monitors referred to ISO 15197:2013 which applies new criteria for the minion accuracy requirements: more than 95% of the blood glucose readings shall fall within ±15mg/dL of the reference method at glucose concentration <100mg/dL and within ±15% of the reference method at glucose concentration ≥100mg/dL. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the 2 GDH monitors as well.
RESULTS: Bland-Altman plots visualized excellent precision of the BG monitors. The 95% limit agreement of overall results for the FAD-GDH-based monitors was within ±12% and that for the Mut. Q-GDH-based monitors was from -10 to +17%. Both BG monitors met the accuracy requirements of ISO 15197:2013. The FAD-GDH-based monitor performed better with neonates and patients with and without diabetes, and the Mut. Q-GDH-based monitor performed better with HD and PD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Analytical results prove that the GDH-based monitors tolerate a broad BG concentration range, are oxygen independent, have BG specificity, and have minimal interference from hematocrit. The GDH-based monitors are reliable for multi-patient use.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial blood; Blood glucose monitoring system; Glucose dehydrogenase; Hemodialysis; ISO 15197:2013; Neonate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24613515     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  6 in total

1.  How Satisfied Are Patients When Their Choice of Funded Glucose Meter Is Restricted to a Single Brand?

Authors:  Christy Macdonald; Helen Lunt; Michelle Downie; Deborah Kendall
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 2.  Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Priya Prahalad
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-08

3.  Falsely Elevated Glucose Concentrations in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Using Icodextrin.

Authors:  Kübra Dogan; Damla Kayalp; Gözde Ceylan; Alper Azak; Mehmet Senes; Murat Duranay; Dogan Yucel
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Comparative Accuracy of 17 Point-of-Care Glucose Meters.

Authors:  Laya Ekhlaspour; Debbie Mondesir; Norman Lautsch; Courtney Balliro; Mallory Hillard; Kendra Magyar; Laura Goergen Radocchia; Aryan Esmaeili; Manasi Sinha; Steven J Russell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-03

5.  Antioxidant-Induced Pseudohyperglycemia Due to Interference of Measurements by Blood Glucose Monitors.

Authors:  Nicole Y Xu; Kevin T Nguyen; Chhavi Mehta; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-09-02

6.  Bimolecular Rate Constants for FAD-Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenase from Aspergillus terreus and Organic Electron Acceptors.

Authors:  Nozomu Tsuruoka; Takuya Sadakane; Rika Hayashi; Seiya Tsujimura
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.