Literature DB >> 24613496

An efficient strategy allowed English-speaking reviewers to identify foreign-language articles eligible for a systematic review.

Jason W Busse1, Paul Bruno2, Keshena Malik3, Gaelan Connell4, David Torrance4, Trung Ngo4, Karin Kirmayr5, Daniel Avrahami4, John J Riva6, Shanil Ebrahim7, Peter A A Struijs8, David Brunarski9, Stephen J Burnie4, Frances LeBlanc10, Eric A Coomes11, Ivan A Steenstra12, Tesha Slack13, Robert Rodine14, Janey Jim15, Victor M Montori16, Gordon H Guyatt17.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess English-speaking reviewers' accuracy in determining the eligibility of foreign-language articles for a systematic review. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of therapy for fibromyalgia. Guided by 10 questions, English-speaking reviewers screened non-English-language articles for eligibility. Teams of two native-language speakers provided reference standard judgments of eligibility.
RESULTS: Of 15,466 potentially eligible articles, we retrieved 763 in full text, of which 133 were published in 19 non-English languages; 53 trials published in 11 languages other than English proved eligible. Of the 53 eligible articles, English-language reviewers guided by the 10 questions mistakenly judged 6 as ineligible; of the 80 ineligible articles, 8 were incorrectly judged eligible by English-language reviewers (sensitivity=0.89; specificity=0.90). Use of a simple three-step rule (excluding languages with less than three articles, reviewing titles and abstracts for clear indications of eligibility, and noting the lack of a clearly reported statistical analysis unless the word "random" appears) led to accurate classification of 51 of 53 articles (sensitivity=0.96; specificity=0.70).
CONCLUSION: Our findings show promise for limiting the need for non-English-language review teams in systematic reviews with large numbers of potentially eligible non-English-language articles.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; English-language bias; Fibromyalgia; Language of publication; Methodology; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24613496     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  7 in total

1.  Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  V C H Chung; X Y Wu; Y Feng; R S T Ho; S Y S Wong; D Threapleton
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 2.  Adverse Events of Mind-Body Interventions in Children: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Meagan Lyszczyk; Mohammad Karkhaneh; Kerri Kaiser Gladwin; Martha Funabashi; Liliane Zorzela; Sunita Vohra
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

3.  Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Lara A Kahale; Thomas Agoritsas; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Jason W Busse; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Shanil Ebrahim; Bradley C Johnston; Ignacio Neumann; Ivan Sola; Xin Sun; Per Vandvik; Yuqing Zhang; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-23

4.  Management of chronic neuropathic pain: a protocol for a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Sohail M Mulla; D Norman Buckley; Dwight E Moulin; Rachel Couban; Zain Izhar; Arnav Agarwal; Akbar Panju; Li Wang; Sun Makosso Kallyth; Alparslan Turan; Victor M Montori; Daniel I Sessler; Lehana Thabane; Gordon H Guyatt; Jason W Busse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Khaled Shawwa; Lara A Kahale; Thomas Agoritsas; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Jason W Busse; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Shanil Ebrahim; Bradley C Johnston; Ignacio Neumann; Ivan Sola; Xin Sun; Per Vandvik; Yuqing Zhang; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  A brief overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Kamath Sriganesh; Harsha Shanthanna; Jason W Busse
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-09

Review 7.  Methods for conducting systematic reviews of risk factors in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Yulia Shenderovich; Manuel Eisner; Christopher Mikton; Frances Gardner; Jianghong Liu; Joseph Murray
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.