Literature DB >> 24613388

Choice of lumbar spine bone density reference database for fracture prediction in men and women: a population-based analysis.

William D Leslie1, Lisa Langsetmo2, Wei Zhou2, David Goltzman2, Christopher S Kovacs3, Jerilynn Prior4, Robert Josse5, Wojciech P Olszynski6, K Shawn Davison6, Tassos Anastassiades7, Tanveer Towheed7, David A Hanley8, Stephanie M Kaiser9, Brian Lentle10, Nancy Kreiger11.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of osteoporosis in men is controversial, although most studies demonstrate similar fracture rates for men and women with the same level of hip bone mineral density (BMD). Whether this applies to the lumbar spine is currently uncertain and has important implications with respect to choice of reference population for T-score calculation and osteoporosis diagnosis. This question was specifically addressed in the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study cohort of 4745 women and 1887 men ages 50+ yr at the time of baseline lumbar spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. In up to 10 yr of observation, incident clinical major osteoporotic fractures occurred in 110 men (5.8%) vs 543 women (11.4%) (p < 0.001). Mean lumbar spine BMD in men was greater than in women, both among those with and those without incident major osteoporotic fracture (p < 0.001). Men were at slightly lower risk for incident major osteoporotic fracture than women for an equivalent lumbar spine BMD (age- and BMD-adjusted rate ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.93, p = 0.008) with similar findings after adjustment for the World Health Organization fracture risk assessment clinical risk factors or competing mortality. No significant sex difference in the BMD relationship was seen for vertebral fractures (clinical or radiographic) or for all fractures. In summary, this large population-based longitudinal cohort study found similar or lower fracture risk for men vs women after adjustment for absolute lumbar spine BMD and additional covariates. The least complicated model for describing fracture risk is therefore to use the same reference lumbar spine data for generating T-scores in men and women.
Copyright © 2014 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; fractures; lumbar spine; sex

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24613388      PMCID: PMC5094882          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  16 in total

1.  Competing mortality and fracture risk assessment.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Lix; X Wu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.

Authors:  H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  BMD and risk of hip and nonvertebral fractures in older men: a prospective study and comparison with older women.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; Peggy M Cawthon; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Howard A Fink; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures.

Authors:  Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Pierre Delmas; John A Eisman; Seiko Fujiwara; Heikki Kroger; Dan Mellstrom; Pierre J Meunier; L Joseph Melton; Terry O'Neill; Huibert Pols; Jonathan Reeve; Alan Silman; Alan Tenenhouse
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Y Wu; C van Kuijk; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; David A Hanley; K Shawn Davison; Robert Josse; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; David Goltzman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; H Johansson; C De Laet; J Brown; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; C Christiansen; S Cummings; J A Eisman; S Fujiwara; C Glüer; D Goltzman; D Hans; M-A Krieg; A La Croix; E McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; K Sanders; A-M Schott; A Silman; D Torgerson; T van Staa; N B Watts; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-Caucasians?

Authors:  Neil C Binkley; Peg Schmeer; Richard D Wasnich; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  A note on competing risks in survival data analysis.

Authors:  J M Satagopan; L Ben-Porat; M Berwick; M Robson; D Kutler; A D Auerbach
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporosis diagnosis in men: the T-score controversy revisited.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Robert Adler; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Osteoporosis in Men: A Review of an Underestimated Bone Condition.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rinonapoli; Carmelinda Ruggiero; Luigi Meccariello; Michele Bisaccia; Paolo Ceccarini; Auro Caraffa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Where's the break? Critique of radiographic vertebral fracture diagnostic methods.

Authors:  J C Prior; E H G Oei; J P Brown; L Oei; F Koromani; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Development of a Nomogram for Predicting Very Low Bone Mineral Density (T-Scores <-3) in the Chinese Population.

Authors:  Yong-Fang Li; Qin-Yi Wang; Lu-Lu Xu; Chun Yue; Li Hu; Na Ding; Yan-Yi Yang; Xiao-Li Qu; Zhi-Feng Sheng
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-02-04

5.  Value of Biochemical Indexes of Bone Metabolism in Predicting Osteoporotic Lumbar Fractures.

Authors:  Fen Feng; CiLa Zhou; Ping Huang; QiaoLin Zhu; Gang Wang; Bin Zhou
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 1.664

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.