Qingbing Wang1, Yi Chen2, Xiaolin Wang1, Gaoquan Gong1, Guoping Li3, Changyu Li3. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, PR China. 2. Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, PR China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, PR China. Electronic address: cy20110921@126.com. 3. Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, PR China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quantification of the association between consumption of fruit and vegetables and risk of gastric cancer (GC) is controversial. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of cohort studies to evaluate the associations. METHODS: Eligible studies published up to 31st August 2013 were retrieved via both computer searches of PubMed and EMBASE and a manual review of references. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary relative risk (SRR). Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochran's Q and I(2) statistics. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles (24 studies), were included in this meta-analysis. There were >2.4 million individuals (6632 GC events) with a median follow-up of 10years. Based on the high versus low analysis, consumption of fruit, but not vegetables, may reduce risk of gastric cancer (fruit: SRR=0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.98, Pheterogeneity=0.450; vegetable: SRR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.88-1.06, Pheterogeneity=0.150). Meta regression analysis suggested that outcome (incidence versus mortality) and study quality (high versus low) contributed significantly to heterogeneity. The same results were also shown in the linear dose-response analysis (per 100-g/day) (fruit: SRR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99; vegetable: SRR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.91-1.01). Significant inverse associations emerged in non-linear models for consumption of fruit (Pnon-linearity=0.04), but not for consumption of vegetables (Pnon-linearity=0.551). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this meta-analysis indicate a significant protective effect for the consumption of fruit on GC risk, but not for the consumption of vegetables.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quantification of the association between consumption of fruit and vegetables and risk of gastric cancer (GC) is controversial. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of cohort studies to evaluate the associations. METHODS: Eligible studies published up to 31st August 2013 were retrieved via both computer searches of PubMed and EMBASE and a manual review of references. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary relative risk (SRR). Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochran's Q and I(2) statistics. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles (24 studies), were included in this meta-analysis. There were >2.4 million individuals (6632 GC events) with a median follow-up of 10years. Based on the high versus low analysis, consumption of fruit, but not vegetables, may reduce risk of gastric cancer (fruit: SRR=0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.98, Pheterogeneity=0.450; vegetable: SRR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.88-1.06, Pheterogeneity=0.150). Meta regression analysis suggested that outcome (incidence versus mortality) and study quality (high versus low) contributed significantly to heterogeneity. The same results were also shown in the linear dose-response analysis (per 100-g/day) (fruit: SRR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99; vegetable: SRR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.91-1.01). Significant inverse associations emerged in non-linear models for consumption of fruit (Pnon-linearity=0.04), but not for consumption of vegetables (Pnon-linearity=0.551). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this meta-analysis indicate a significant protective effect for the consumption of fruit on GC risk, but not for the consumption of vegetables.
Authors: Haejin In; Marisa Langdon-Embry; Lauren Gordon; Clyde B Schechter; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Philip E Castle; M Margaret Kemeny; Bruce D Rapkin Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Anne Grundy; Abbey E Poirier; Farah Khandwala; Alison McFadden; Christine M Friedenreich; Darren R Brenner Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2016-12-12
Authors: Zhensheng Wang; David Y Graham; Anam Khan; Maya Balakrishnan; Hannah R Abrams; Hashem B El-Serag; Aaron P Thrift Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Tianyi Wang; Hui Cai; Shizuka Sasazuki; Shoichiro Tsugane; Wei Zheng; Eo Rin Cho; Sun Ha Jee; Angelika Michel; Michael Pawlita; Yong-Bing Xiang; Yu-Tang Gao; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei-Cheng You; Meira Epplein Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Bach Viet Hoang; Jeonghee Lee; Il Ju Choi; Young-Woo Kim; Keun Won Ryu; Jeongseon Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 5.742