Literature DB >> 24612723

Cross-validation of a portable, six-degree-of-freedom load cell for use in lower-limb prosthetics research.

Sara R Koehler1, Yasin Y Dhaher2, Andrew H Hansen3.   

Abstract

The iPecs load cell is a lightweight, six-degree-of-freedom force transducer designed to fit easily into an endoskeletal prosthesis via a universal mounting interface. Unlike earlier tethered systems, it is capable of wireless data transmission and on-board memory storage, which facilitate its use in both clinical and real-world settings. To date, however, the validity of the iPecs load cell has not been rigorously established, particularly for loading conditions that represent typical prosthesis use. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of an iPecs load cell during in situ human subject testing by cross-validating its force and moment measurements with those of a typical gait analysis laboratory. Specifically, the gait mechanics of a single person with transtibial amputation were simultaneously measured using an iPecs load cell, multiple floor-mounted force platforms, and a three-dimensional motion capture system. Overall, the forces and moments measured by the iPecs were highly correlated with those measured by the gait analysis laboratory (r>0.86) and RMSEs were less than 3.4% and 5.2% full scale output across all force and moment channels, respectively. Despite this favorable comparison, however, the results of a sensitivity analysis suggest that care should be taken to accurately identify the axes and instrumentation center of the load cell in situations where iPecs data will be interpreted in a coordinate system other than its own (e.g., inverse dynamics analysis). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amputation; Force transducer; Gait analysis; Load cell; Prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24612723     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Per G Reinhall; Kate J Allyn; Jake McLean; Paul Hinrichs; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The biomechanical response of persons with transfemoral amputation to variations in prosthetic knee alignment during level walking.

Authors:  Sara R Koehler-McNicholas; Robert D Lipschutz; Steven A Gard
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2016

3.  Developing a control framework for self-adjusting prosthetic sockets incorporating tissue injury risk estimation and generalized predictive control.

Authors:  F M Mbithi; A J Chipperfield; J W Steer; A S Dickinson
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2021-12-02

4.  The influence of a hydraulic prosthetic ankle on residual limb loading during sloped walking.

Authors:  Sara R Koehler-McNicholas; Eric A Nickel; Joseph Medvec; Kyle Barrons; Spencer Mion; Andrew H Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An Inductive Sensing System to Measure In-Socket Residual Limb Displacements for People Using Lower-Limb Prostheses.

Authors:  Katrina M Henrikson; Ethan J Weathersby; Brian G Larsen; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Adapting Semi-Active Prostheses to Real-World Movements: Sensing and Controlling the Dynamic Mean Ankle Moment Arm with a Variable-Stiffness Foot on Ramps and Stairs.

Authors:  Jennifer K Leestma; Katherine Heidi Fehr; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Loading characteristics data applied on osseointegrated implant by transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses fitted with state-of-the-art components during daily activities.

Authors:  Laurent Frossard; Stefan Laux; Marta Geada; Peter Paul Heym; Knut Lechler
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2022-02-10

8.  Noncontact Strain Monitoring of Osseointegrated Prostheses.

Authors:  Sumit Gupta; Han-Joo Lee; Kenneth J Loh; Michael D Todd; Joseph Reed; A Drew Barnett
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Loading characteristics data applied on osseointegrated implant by transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses fitted with basic components during daily activities.

Authors:  Laurent Frossard
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-09-11

10.  Inter-participant variability data in loading applied on osseointegrated implant by transtibial bone-anchored prostheses during daily activities.

Authors:  Laurent Frossard; Barry Leech; Mark Pitkin
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-09-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.