Literature DB >> 24612448

Establishment of a validated training programme on the Eyesi cataract simulator. A prospective randomized study.

Joel Bergqvist1, Anna Person, Anders Vestergaard, Jakob Grauslund.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish and evaluate a systematic training programme to be included into the ophthalmologic resident curriculum.
METHODS: Medical students (n = 20) within a year from graduation and with no previous ophthalmic experience were included in this prospective study and randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 10) completed the Eyesi cataract simulator training programme once a week for 4 weeks, while Group B (n = 10) completed it once a week at the first and the last week. Two cataract surgeons were used to determine two different levels of reference scores. Score per analysed module [two different levels of Capsulorhexis (A and B), Hydromaneuver, Phaco divide and conquer], Overall score, Total time, Cornea injury, Capsule rupture and Capsule damage by ultrasound were recorded.
RESULTS: Group A outperformed Group B in several modules, reached a significant higher number of reference scores (p < 0.01) and caused fewer complications with regard to Capsule rupture (p = 0.01) and Capsule damage by ultrasound (p < 0.05). Both Groups A and B improved their performance and also became more time efficient (p < 0.01 for both groups). Group A showed positive learning curves for Overall score (p < 0.01), Capsulorhexis A (p < 0.01), Capsulorhexis B (p < 0.01) and Hydromaneuver (p = 0.01). Group B showed a significant improvement for Overall score (p < 0.01), Hydromaneuver (p = 0.02) and Phaco divide and conquer (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Repetitive training with a systematic training programme, based on validated modules in the Eyesi simulator, was shown to improve simulated cataract surgery skills. Higher level of skills and more reference scores were reached with more training. Furthermore, the programme was optimized to be applied into the standard ophthalmological curriculum for cataract surgery training.
© 2014 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eyesi; cataract surgery simulator; construct validity; systematic training programme

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24612448     DOI: 10.1111/aos.12383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  13 in total

1.  Trabeculectomy training in England: are we safe at training? Two year surgical outcomes.

Authors:  A Walkden; J Huxtable; M Senior; H Lee; S Naylor; S Turner; K Ivanova; J Koppens; B Todd; A Macleod; F Sii; N Anand; P Shah; A King; D C Broadway; J F Kirwan; A McNaught; A Bhan-Bhargava
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Immersive technology in ophthalmology education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shakeel Lowe; Kathryn Mares; Zarnie Khadjesari
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 3.  Modern Educational Simulation-Based Tools Among Residents of Ophthalmology: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Simon J Lowater; Jakob Grauslund; Anna S Vergmann
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-08-24

4.  Surgical Simulation Training Reduces Intraoperative Cataract Surgery Complications Among Residents.

Authors:  Patrick C Staropoli; Ninel Z Gregori; Anna K Junk; Anat Galor; Raquel Goldhardt; Brian E Goldhagen; Wei Shi; William Feuer
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 5.  Outcomes, Measurement Instruments, and Their Validity Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education: Systematic Mapping Review.

Authors:  Lorainne Tudor Car; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Andrew Teo; Tatiana Erlikh Fox; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Christian Apfelbacher; Sandra Kemp; Niels Chavannes
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.364

6.  Clinical Efficacy of Simulated Vitreoretinal Surgery to Prepare Surgeons for the Upcoming Intervention in the Operating Room.

Authors:  Svenja Deuchler; Clemens Wagner; Pankaj Singh; Michael Müller; Rami Al-Dwairi; Rachid Benjilali; Markus Schill; Hanns Ackermann; Dimitra Bon; Thomas Kohnen; Benjamin Schoene; Michael Koss; Frank Koch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Man versus Machine: Software Training for Surgeons-An Objective Evaluation of Human and Computer-Based Training Tools for Cataract Surgical Performance.

Authors:  Nizar Din; Phillip Smith; Krisztina Emeriewen; Anant Sharma; Simon Jones; James Wawrzynski; Hongying Tang; Paul Sullivan; Silvestro Caputo; George M Saleh
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Does Cataract Surgery Simulation Correlate with Real-life Experience?

Authors:  Ayşe Bozkurt Oflaz; Bengü Ekinci Köktekir; Süleyman Okudan
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-29

9.  Usefulness of Surgical Media Center as a Cataract Surgery Educational Tool.

Authors:  Tomoichiro Ogawa; Takuya Shiba; Hiroshi Tsuneoka
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  A Comparative Assessment of Intraoperative Complication Rates in Resident-Performed Phacoemulsification Surgeries According to Najjar-Awwad Preoperative Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Hamid Gharaee; Masoud Jahani; Saeed Banan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.