Sarah R MacEwan1, Ashutosh Chilkoti. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering and ‡Research Triangle MRSEC, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.
Abstract
Internalization into cancer cells is a significant challenge in the delivery of many anticancer therapeutics. Drug carriers can address this challenge by facilitating cellular uptake of cytotoxic cargo in the tumor, while preventing cellular uptake in healthy tissues. Here we describe an extrinsically controlled drug carrier, a nanopeptifier, that amplifies cellular uptake by modulating the activity of cell-penetrating peptides with thermally toggled self-assembly of a genetically encoded polypeptide nanoparticle. When appended with a proapoptotic peptide, the nanopeptifier creates a cytotoxic switch, inducing apoptosis only in its self-assembled state. The nanopeptifier provides a new approach to tune the cellular uptake and activity of anticancer therapeutics by an extrinsic thermal trigger.
Internalization into cancer cells is a significant challenge in the delivery of many anticancer therapeutics. Drug carriers can address this challenge by facilitating cellular uptake of cytotoxic cargo in the tumor, while preventing cellular uptake in healthy tissues. Here we describe an extrinsically controlled drug carrier, a nanopeptifier, that amplifies cellular uptake by modulating the activity of cell-penetrating peptides with thermally toggled self-assembly of a genetically encoded polypeptide nanoparticle. When appended with a proapoptotic peptide, the nanopeptifier creates a cytotoxic switch, inducing apoptosis only in its self-assembled state. The nanopeptifier provides a new approach to tune the cellular uptake and activity of anticancer therapeutics by an extrinsic thermal trigger.
Anticancer therapeutics face
major transport barriers between their site of administration and
their intended site of action in the tumor. Most systemically delivered
therapies must overcome barriers to prevent clearance of drug from
the circulation, enhance the penetration and accumulation of drug
in the tumor tissue, and achieve internalization of drug in cancer
cells, a final barrier that is critical to overcome for drugs with
intracellular therapeutic targets. Cellular uptake can be a significant
challenge for therapeutics, such as peptide drugs, as the cell membrane
may act as an impermeable barrier to their entry and thereby prevent
internalization.The challenge of enhancing cellular uptake
of drug in the tumor
can be addressed with drug carriers that selectively maximize their
uptake by cancer cells, while minimizing their uptake by cells in
healthy tissues. Affinity targeting is one approach to specifically
enhance uptake in the tumor by functionalizing drug carriers with
targeting ligands that preferentially interact with receptors overexpressed
on cancer cells and induce internalization of the bound complex. However,
this approach is limited in its application to specific types of cancer[1] and subsets of patients[2−5] that reliably express the targeted
receptor at levels that are significantly above healthy tissues. An
alternative approach that nonspecifically enhances cellular uptake
relies on cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) that can ferry diverse
cargo such as peptides, proteins, liposomes, and micelles across cell
membranes by a receptor-independent mechanism.[6−9] This nonspecific means of cellular
uptake, however, results in a lack of selectivity, as the promiscuity
of CPPs will lead to uptake into most cells that they encounter as
they traverse the body.Approaches to harness the cellular uptake
of CPPs for tumor-targeted
internalization typically seek to activate CPP function in response
to a tumor-specific trigger, such as overexpressed tumor enzymes or
low tumor pH.[10] These approaches include
activation of CPP function by the removal of stealth coatings to reveal
CPPs,[11−15] the activation of molecular actuators to expose CPPs beyond protective
coronas,[16] or the release of CPPs from
ionically associated inhibitors.[17−21] These approaches successfully control CPP activity
but rely on intrinsic features of the tumor and thus are subject to
limitations of tumor heterogeneity, similar to affinity targeting.Herein, we demonstrate a method to extrinsically tune CPP activity
with thermally toggled self-assembly of a genetically encoded polypeptide
nanoparticle and thereby control the intracellular delivery of a cytotoxic
cargo. We call this platform the nanopeptifier, by analogy to an electronic
amplifier (Figure 1). The nanopeptifier consists
of three modular, genetically encoded peptide elements. The first
element is an externally triggered digital switch, which consists
of a temperature-responsive elastin-like polypeptide diblock copolymer
(ELPBC) that self-assembles into a spherical micelle above
a critical temperature.[22] This digital
switch of morphology from unimer to micelle controls the activity
of the second element, a CPP that is appended to the hydrophilic terminus
of the ELPBC. Working in concert, the ELPBC and
CPP act as an amplifier of cellular uptake by modulating the density
and thus the activity of the CPP on the nanoparticle surface and enhancing
the cellular uptake of the micelle (high CPP density), as compared
to the unimer (low CPP density). The third element of the nanopeptifier
is a therapeutic payload. A proapoptotic peptide drug was chosen as
a stringent test of the nanopeptifier due to the inherently poor intracellular
delivery of many peptide drugs.
Figure 1
Design and function of an ELPBC nanopeptifier. (A) Each
nanopeptifier is a ternary fusion of a therapeutic payload, an ELPBC comprised of a hydrophobic and hydrophilic ELP domain, and
a CPP. (B) At physiologic temperature (“off” state,
37 °C), nanopeptifiers are soluble unimers, displaying a single
CPP on their hydrophilic terminus. At conditions of mild clinical
hyperthermia (“on” state, 42 °C), nanopeptifiers
self-assemble into spherical micelles, displaying a high density of
CPPs on the micelle corona. The increased CPP density amplifies cellular
uptake in the micelle state, as compared to the unimer state. Important
nanopeptifier parameters include: leakage uptake, “off”
state uptake at 37 °C; amplified uptake, “on” state
uptake at 42 °C; gain, ratio of “on” to “off”
state uptake.
The nanopeptifier provides controlled
and tunable intracellular
delivery of a therapeutic payload by the modulation of cellular uptake
triggered by an external thermal input. The choice of the CPP element
(ranging from weak to strong in its cell-penetrating ability) and
the modulation of its interfacial density by nanoparticle self-assembly
creates a system in which three important parameters can be controlled:
(1) the “off” state-leakage-uptake that controls systemic
off-target toxicity, (2) the “on” state-amplified-uptake
that controls targeted anticancer cell toxicity, and (3) the “gain”
in cellular uptake, defined as the fold-increase between the amplified
uptake and leakage uptake that controls the selectivity of intracellular
delivery between target and off-target cells (Figure 1). The nanopeptifier platform thus provides a library of stimulus-responsive
carriers that can probe physiological questions critical to the success
of actively targeted drug carriers by examining the importance of
limiting cellular uptake in the carrier’s “off”
state, increasing uptake in the “on” state and providing
sufficient amplification between these two states to tune the controlled
delivery of a cytotoxic payload.Design and function of an ELPBC nanopeptifier. (A) Each
nanopeptifier is a ternary fusion of a therapeutic payload, an ELPBC comprised of a hydrophobic and hydrophilic ELP domain, and
a CPP. (B) At physiologic temperature (“off” state,
37 °C), nanopeptifiers are soluble unimers, displaying a single
CPP on their hydrophilic terminus. At conditions of mild clinical
hyperthermia (“on” state, 42 °C), nanopeptifiers
self-assemble into spherical micelles, displaying a high density of
CPPs on the micelle corona. The increased CPP density amplifies cellular
uptake in the micelle state, as compared to the unimer state. Important
nanopeptifier parameters include: leakage uptake, “off”
state uptake at 37 °C; amplified uptake, “on” state
uptake at 42 °C; gain, ratio of “on” to “off”
state uptake.The nanopeptifier significantly
advances our previous efforts toward
building a digital switch of cellular uptake.[23] In this previous study, ELPBCs functionalized with a
penta-arginine (Arg5) CPP were designed to self-assemble
in response to conditions of mild hyperthermia for which 42 °C
is a typical temperature achieved in the clinical setting.[24,25] We chose mild hyperthermia as the extrinsic trigger of self-assembly
because it can be applied to tumors in a variety of anatomical locations
by the use of focused microwaves, radiofrequency, or ultrasound.[26−28] In cell culture, raising the temperature from 37 to 42 °C triggered
the self-assembly of the Arg5-ELPBC into spherical
micelles, thereby resulting in a high interfacial density of Arg residues,
which enhanced intracellular accumulation of the micelles at 42 °C,
as compared to the Arg5-ELPBC unimers at 37
°C. These preliminary results showed that intracellular uptake
could be controlled by the manipulation of CPP density with hyperthermia-triggered
nanoparticle assembly.[23] However, with
only a single CPP-ELPBC used in this previous study, none
of the three parameters of interest, the leakage uptake, amplified
uptake, or gain, could be tuned and the lack of a therapeutic payload
precluded the functional evaluation of these parameters in the context
of targeted drug delivery and anticancer efficacy.The nanopeptifier
library investigated herein is composed of an
ELPBC that is genetically appended with different CPPs
at the C-terminus of the hydrophilic ELPBC domain, such
that the CPP is displayed on the nanoparticle corona upon micelle
assembly under conditions of mild hyperthermia (Table 1). In order to modulate the performance of the nanopeptifier,
we chose a diverse set of CPPs that include peptides that are nonfunctional
when presented as a monovalent entity, such as Arg5,[29−31] peptides that are potent even in a monovalent state, such as Arg8 and TAT, and a peptide with intermediate potency, such as
a modified TAT sequence (RTAT), which conserves the Arg residues in
the TAT CPP while replacing all other residues with glycine.
Table 1
Library of CPP-ELPBC Nanopeptifiers
nanopeptifier
CPP functionalization
MW (kDa)
RH at 37 °C (nm)a
RH at 42 °C (nm)a
Arg5-ELPBC
RRRRR
40.50
5.7 ± 0.3
20.8 ± 1.0
Arg8-ELPBC
RRRRRRRR
40.97
5.4 ± 0.4
21.2 ± 0.3
TAT-ELPBCb
YGRKKRRQRRR
41.26
5.7 ± 0.3
21.4 ± 0.3
RTAT-ELPBCc
YGRGGRRGRRR
41.05
6.5 ± 0.2
21.8 ± 0.3
ELPBC
none
39.72
6.2 ± 0.1
20.3 ± 0.3
Hydrodynamic radius
determined by
dynamic light scattering of ELPBC at 10 μM in PBS.
Data represents mean of three measurements ± SEM.
TAT sequence corresponds to residues
47–57 from the transactivator of transcription of HIV.
RTAT was modified to explore the
effects of arginine architecture on CPP function, where all nonarginine
residues of TAT were replaced with neutral glycine residues.
Hydrodynamic radius
determined by
dynamic light scattering of ELPBC at 10 μM in PBS.
Data represents mean of three measurements ± SEM.TAT sequence corresponds to residues
47–57 from the transactivator of transcription of HIV.RTAT was modified to explore the
effects of arginine architecture on CPP function, where all nonarginine
residues of TAT were replaced with neutral glycine residues.Genes encoding the nanopeptifier
library of CPP-ELPBCs (Supporting Information Figure S1) were
synthesized by recursive directional ligation by plasmid reconstruction,[32] expressed in E. coli from a
plasmid-borne gene and purified by inverse transition cycling.[33] The size and purity of the CPP-ELPBCs was confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Supporting Information Figure S2A) and the thermal properties of the CPP-ELPBCs were measured by temperature-regulated turbidimetry and dynamic
light scattering (DLS). Turbidimetry measurements of CPP-ELPBC solutions at 15 μM, as a function of solution temperature,
revealed a modest increase in optical density (OD at 350 nm of <0.1),
which is indicative of the transition from unimer to micelle between
38 and 41 °C, defined as the critical micellization temperature
(CMT). Increasing the temperature beyond ∼54–66 °C
resulted in a significantly greater optical density (OD at 350 nm
of >1.5) that signals the aggregation of CPP-ELPBC micelles
into micrometer size coacervates (Figure 2).
The incorporation of a CPP at the hydrophilic terminus of the ELPBC did not perturb temperature-triggered self-assembly of the
CPP-ELPBC, as confirmed by DLS, since all CPP-ELPBCs and a nonfunctionalized ELPBC control existed as unimers
at 37 °C with a hydrodynamic radius (RH) < 10 nm, while a RH of ∼20
nm was measured at 42 °C, indicating self-assembly into micelles
(Table 1). Although CPP-functionalization did
not perturb the CMT of the ELPBC, it did influence the
temperature at which micelle aggregation occurred. Interestingly,
the Arg5 functionalization depressed the temperature at
which micelle aggregation was observed, as compared to nonfunctionalized
ELPBC (Figure 2). This effect likely
stems from the relative hydrophobicity of the arginine amino acid,
despite its polar cationic character, due to the delocalized charge
of its guanidinium headgroup.[34−36] However, the effect of arginine
functionalization is likely a complex combination of hydrophobic and
electrostatic factors, as increasing the net charge from Arg5 to Arg8 functionalization did not further depress the
micelle aggregation temperature but rather increased slightly the
temperature at which micelle aggregation occurred.
Figure 2
Characterization of CPP-ELPBC nanopeptifiers by temperature-regulated
turbidimetry. A moderate increase in optical density (OD < 0.1)
of solutions at 15 μM is suggestive of self-assembly of ELPBC unimers into spherical micelles between 38 and 41 °C.
A drastic increase in optical density indicates coacervation of CPP-ELPBCs into micrometer size aggregates between approximately 54
and 66 °C. Arg5- and Arg8-ELPBCs are shown here as representative examples of the thermal behavior
of the CPP-ELPBC library, demonstrating that CPP-functionalization
does not perturb the CMT, as compared to the nonfunctionalized ELPBC control, but does influence the temperature at which aggregation
of the micelles occurs.
Characterization of CPP-ELPBC nanopeptifiers by temperature-regulated
turbidimetry. A moderate increase in optical density (OD < 0.1)
of solutions at 15 μM is suggestive of self-assembly of ELPBC unimers into spherical micelles between 38 and 41 °C.
A drastic increase in optical density indicates coacervation of CPP-ELPBCs into micrometer size aggregates between approximately 54
and 66 °C. Arg5- and Arg8-ELPBCs are shown here as representative examples of the thermal behavior
of the CPP-ELPBC library, demonstrating that CPP-functionalization
does not perturb the CMT, as compared to the nonfunctionalized ELPBC control, but does influence the temperature at which aggregation
of the micelles occurs.Controlled cellular uptake as a function of temperature-triggered
CPP-ELPBC micelle assembly was visualized by live cell
confocal fluorescence microscopy. HeLa cervical cancer cells were
incubated for 1 h with 15 μM of Alexa Fluor 488-labeled CPP-ELPBCs at 37 or 42 °C. Nonfunctionalized ELPBC showed no visible uptake at either thermal condition (Figure 3A,B), demonstrating that in the absence of a CPP
moiety self-assembly of the ELPBCs alone results in negligible
amplification of internalization. The ELPBC can thus serve
as a useful scaffold for self-assembly wherein the performance parameters
of the nanopeptifier can be encoded primarily by the CPP moiety. Arg5-ELPBC demonstrated little uptake at 37 °C
in its unimer state but exhibited significantly greater cellular uptake
at 42 °C (Figure 3C,D). These results
are consistent with our previous study in which we showed that although
Arg5 is a nonfunctional CPP as a single copy presented
by an ELP unimer, it shows evidence of cell-penetrative ability when
presented at a high interfacial density on the micelle corona.[23]
Figure 3
Visualization
of controlled cellular uptake of CPP-ELPBCs by confocal
fluorescence microscopy. HeLa cells were incubated
for 1 h at 37 or 42 °C with 15 μM ELPBC (A,B),
Arg5-ELPBC (C,D), Arg8-ELPBC (E,F), TAT-ELPBC (G,H), or RTAT-ELPBC (I,J).
Cells were briefly incubated with Alexa 594 wheat agglutinin and Hoechst
33342 to stain the cell membrane and cell nuclei, respectively. At
42 °C, the CPP-ELPBCs self-assembled into micelles
displaying enhanced CPP density on the micelle corona, which resulted
in amplified cellular uptake, though to differing extents, for the
CPP-ELPBCs, as compared to 37 °C, at which all CPP-ELPBCs existed as soluble unimers presenting only a single CPP
per polypeptide. In contrast, the nonfunctionalized ELPBC control showed no difference in cellular uptake between 37 and 42
°C. Red, cell membrane; blue, cell nuclei; green, ELPBC; scale bars, 50 μm.
In contrast, when the ELPBC was appended with a functional
CPP, such as Arg8 (Figure 3E), TAT
(Figure 3G), or RTAT (Figure 3I), there was visible uptake even at the “off”
state of 37 °C, which is consistent with the known ability of
a single copy of these CPPs to cause cellular uptake. Cellular internalization
was dramatically amplified when a high density of these CPPs, Arg8, TAT, and RTAT, were presented by the CPP-ELPBC micelles, as seen by the strong intracellular fluorescence at 42
°C (Figure 3F,H,J). Nanopeptifiers that
display functional CPPs thus provide greatly enhanced uptake at their
“on” state but at the cost of increased uptake in their
“off” state, which is particularly pronounced for Arg8- and TAT-ELPBCs. The characteristic punctate appearance
of internalized CPP-ELPBCs indicates that uptake of all
nanopeptifiers occurs by endocytic mechanisms at both 37 and 42 °C.Visualization
of controlled cellular uptake of CPP-ELPBCs by confocal
fluorescence microscopy. HeLa cells were incubated
for 1 h at 37 or 42 °C with 15 μM ELPBC (A,B),
Arg5-ELPBC (C,D), Arg8-ELPBC (E,F), TAT-ELPBC (G,H), or RTAT-ELPBC (I,J).
Cells were briefly incubated with Alexa 594wheat agglutinin and Hoechst
33342 to stain the cell membrane and cell nuclei, respectively. At
42 °C, the CPP-ELPBCs self-assembled into micelles
displaying enhanced CPP density on the micelle corona, which resulted
in amplified cellular uptake, though to differing extents, for the
CPP-ELPBCs, as compared to 37 °C, at which all CPP-ELPBCs existed as soluble unimers presenting only a single CPP
per polypeptide. In contrast, the nonfunctionalized ELPBC control showed no difference in cellular uptake between 37 and 42
°C. Red, cell membrane; blue, cell nuclei; green, ELPBC; scale bars, 50 μm.Quantification of cellular uptake by flow cytometry confirmed
the
tunable intracellular delivery by thermally triggered CPP-ELPBC micelle assembly. All CPP-ELPBCs demonstrated
an amplification of uptake at 42 °C, as compared to 37 °C,
while the nonfunctionalized ELPBC control showed no significant
difference in uptake between the “off” (37 °C)
and “on” (42 °C) state (Figure 4A). This supported our hypothesis that the interfacial CPP
density that is controlled by micelle assembly controls the amplification
in cellular uptake, and that mild hyperthermia alone does not result
in the observed effect. While all CPP-ELPBCs demonstrated
an amplification of cellular uptake with temperature-triggered micelle
assembly, the amplitude of uptake at the “off” and “on”
temperatures varied greatly depending on the potency of the nanopeptifier’s
CPP domain. The gain, calculated as the ratio of cellular fluorescence
at 42 °C as compared 37 °C, demonstrated the controlled
internalization afforded by temperature-triggered micelle assembly
of the nanopeptifier, while also revealing the variation in nanopeptifier
performance depending on the CPP functionalization (Figure 4B).
Figure 4
Quantification of controlled cellular uptake of CPP-ELPBCs by flow cytometry. HeLa cells were incubated with 10 μM
CPP-ELPBCs for 1 h at 37 or 42 °C. (A) Internalization
was quantified
by cellular fluorescence in live cells. All CPP-ELPBCs
showed significant increase in cellular fluorescence at 42 °C,
as compared to 37 °C, whereas nonfunctionalized ELPBC showed no difference in uptake between the two temperatures. *Indicates p < 0.01 between thermal conditions (two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni
posthoc test for multiple comparisons). (B) Gain in cellular uptake
was defined as the ratio of cellular fluorescence at 42 and 37 °C.
*Indicates p < 0.0125 versus ELPBC control
(ANOVA, Bonferroni posthoc test for multiple comparisons). Data represents
mean of three experiments ± SEM.
Quantification of controlled cellular uptake of CPP-ELPBCs by flow cytometry. HeLa cells were incubated with 10 μM
CPP-ELPBCs for 1 h at 37 or 42 °C. (A) Internalization
was quantified
by cellular fluorescence in live cells. All CPP-ELPBCs
showed significant increase in cellular fluorescence at 42 °C,
as compared to 37 °C, whereas nonfunctionalized ELPBC showed no difference in uptake between the two temperatures. *Indicates p < 0.01 between thermal conditions (two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni
posthoc test for multiple comparisons). (B) Gain in cellular uptake
was defined as the ratio of cellular fluorescence at 42 and 37 °C.
*Indicates p < 0.0125 versus ELPBC control
(ANOVA, Bonferroni posthoc test for multiple comparisons). Data represents
mean of three experiments ± SEM.Flow cytometry quantified the cellular uptake and provided
quantitative
figures-of-merit (FOM) for the nanopeptifier that are likely to control
the partitioning of CPP-ELPBC between healthy and tumor
tissue by focused mild hyperthermia (Table 2). The intracellular uptake at 37 and 42 °C for each CPP-ELPBC, as expressed in arbitrary units of cellular fluorescence,
was defined as the leakage and amplified uptake, respectively. The
ratio of amplified to leakage uptake was defined as the gain achieved
by each CPP-ELPBC. Definition of these parameters provided
a self-consistent approach to comparing nanopeptifier performance
between CPP-ELPBCs. The range of values for each FOM suggested
that these three critical parameters could be tuned across one to
two orders of magnitude within this nanopeptifier library. To our
knowledge, no other system for selective cell uptake shows such tunability.
Table 2
Nanopeptifier Figures-of-Merit Quantified
by Flow Cytometry
nanopeptifier
CPP
functionalization
leakage uptakea
amplified
uptakea
gainb
Arg5-ELPBC
RRRRR
2.5
12.5
5.0
Arg8-ELPBC
RRRRRRRR
11.0
129.4
11.8
TAT-ELPBC
YGRKKRRQRRR
10.0
101.9
10.2
RTAT-ELPBC
YGRGGRRGRRR
2.9
23.0
7.9
ELPBC
none
1.0
0.9
0.9
Measured in arbitrary units of cellular
fluorescence, normalized to leakage uptake of nonfunctionalized ELPBC.
Defined as the
ratio of amplified
to leakage uptake.
Measured in arbitrary units of cellular
fluorescence, normalized to leakage uptake of nonfunctionalized ELPBC.Defined as the
ratio of amplified
to leakage uptake.Next,
we explored the tunable amplification of cellular uptake
for controlled therapeutic delivery by appending a cytotoxic payload
to the nanopeptifier. Arg5- and Arg8-ELPBCs were selected as the carrier platforms as they encompassed
the extremes in nanopeptifier FOM that are likely to control the performance
of CPP-ELPBCs as drug carriers. These CPP-ELPBCs were functionalized with a biologic drug, the BH3 peptide (MGQVGRQLAIIGDDINRRY),
corresponding to residues 71–89 of the proapoptotic Bak protein.[37,38] The BH3 peptide sensitizes cells to apoptosis by inhibiting pro-survival
proteins and has been shown to induce cytotoxic effects in HeLa cells
when administered by CPP-assisted delivery.[38−40] This drug was
chosen as a stringent test for CPP-ELPBC carriers, as the
intracellular delivery of peptide drugs remains one of the grand challenges
of drug delivery, since peptide drugs typically suffer from limited
efficacy due to fast plasma clearance, susceptibility to degradation,
and difficulty in crossing the hydrophobic cell membrane to reach
their intracellular therapeutic targets.[41]The BH3 peptide was genetically appended to the N-terminus
of the
ELPBC such that it would be sequestered in the micelle
core upon self-assembly. To enable intracellular release of free BH3
peptide, an RVRR peptide linker, cleavable by furin and cathepsin
B proteases,[42−44] was included between the BH3 peptide and the CPP-ELPBC. Furin is primarily localized in the trans-Golgi network
from which it gains access to endosomal and lysosomal compartments[42,45,46] whereas cathepsin B is present
in early and late endosomes as well as lysosomes.[47] These enzymes thus serve as good candidates for the intracellular
release of peptide drug following the endocytic uptake of CPP-ELPBCs.Arg5-ELPBC, Arg8-ELPBC, and a nonfunctionalized ELPBC control
were genetically
appended with BH3 and an intervening furin- and cathepsin B-cleavable
RVRR peptide linker (denoted cBH3). A noncleavable control, lacking
the RVRR linker (denoted BH3), was synthesized to evaluate the importance
of intracellular release of the BH3 peptide from the nanopeptifier.
Additionally, a control appended with the RVRR linker but lacking
the BH3 peptide was synthesized to confirm that the peptide linker
had no bioactivity. The size and purity of CPP-ELPBC drug
conjugates and controls were confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Supporting Information Figure S2B). Incorporation of the BH3
peptide and cleavable linker into the CPP-ELPBC design
did not perturb temperature-triggered micelle assembly, as demonstrated
by temperature-regulated turbidimetry measurements (Supporting Information Figure S3) and DLS (Table 3). The release of free BH3 peptide was confirmed
by incubation of CPP-ELPBC drug conjugates with furin and
visualization of the cleavage products by SDS-PAGE. Free BH3 peptide
was released from all CPP-ELPBC-cBH3 carriers, whereas
CPP-ELPBC-BH3 lacking the cleavable RVRR linker did not
release the BH3 peptide in the presence of furin (Supporting Information Figure S4).
Table 3
Library
of CPP-ELPBC Nanopeptifier
Drug Conjugates
nanopeptifier
CPP functionalization
BH3 drug
RVRR linker
RH at 37 °C (nm)a
RH at 42 °C (nm)a
ELPBC-cBH3
none
+
+
9.7 ± 0.1
23.6 ± 0.8
Arg5-ELPBC-cBH3
RRRRR
+
+
7.8 ± 0.2
24.1 ± 1.7
Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3
RRRRRRRR
+
+
8.2 ± 0.1
27.5 ± 0.3
Arg8-ELPBC-BH3
RRRRRRRR
+
–
7.4 ± 0.3
22.1 ± 0.4
Hydrodynamic radius
determined by
DLS of CPP-ELPBC drug conjugates at 15 μM in PBS.
Data represents mean of three measurements ± SEM.
Hydrodynamic radius
determined by
DLS of CPP-ELPBC drug conjugates at 15 μM in PBS.
Data represents mean of three measurements ± SEM.The cytotoxicity of CPP-ELPBC drug conjugates was assessed
by a modified survival assay in which HeLa cells were incubated with
drug carrier or controls at 37 or 42 °C for 1 h, after which
the cells were washed and returned to complete media. After 24 h,
cell survival was quantified by MTS assay. This assay is an extremely
stringent test of the ability of the CPP-ELPBC drug conjugates
to induce a cytotoxic effect, as it relies on the intracellular delivery
of BH3 peptide drug cargo over the course of only 1 h, mimicking the
typical in vivo duration of mild clinical hyperthermia.[24]Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3
induced significant cell
death at 42 °C, as compared to cells at 37 °C, while no
significant changes in cell survival were observed with Arg5-ELPBC-cBH3 or with nonfunctionalized ELPBC-cBH3 control (Figure 5A). The difference
in cell survival between 37 and 42 °C was much less pronounced
for Arg8-ELPBC-BH3, which lacked a cleavable
peptide linker, and thus could not release free BH3 following internalization.
Free BH3 peptide alone showed no cytotoxicity at either thermal condition,
likely due to poor intracellular delivery caused by the impermeability
of the cell membrane to this peptide. Furthermore, treatment with
mild hyperthermia alone, CPP-ELPBC carrier without drug
or Arg8-ELPBC-RVRR resulted in no significant
difference in cell survival between 37 and 42 °C (Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6). These
results clearly indicate that the intracellular delivery afforded
by Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3 and subsequent intracellular
release of free peptide drug by cleavage of the RVRR linker are necessary
features that control the functional performance of a nanopeptifier
armed with proapoptotic BH3 peptide cargo.
Figure 5
Quantification of cytotoxicity
of CPP-ELPBC drug carriers.
(A) Cytotoxicity of CPP-ELPBC carriers appended with BH3
peptide drug was evaluated by a modified cell survival assay. HeLa
cells were incubated with Arg5-ELPBC-cBH3, Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3, or ELPBC-cBH3 with cleavable
peptide drug cargo for 1 h at 37 or 42 °C. HeLa cells were also
incubated with controls including Arg8-ELPBC-BH3 with noncleavable peptide drug cargo and free BH3 peptide alone.
Cells were washed and returned to complete media for 24 h before cell
survival was quantified by MTS assay. *Indicates p < 0.005 between thermal conditions (two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni
posthoc test for multiple comparisons). (B) Induction of apoptosis
was evaluated by quantification of caspase-3 activity. Caspase-3 activity
was quantified in HeLa cell lysates after treatment with ELPBC-cBH3, Arg5-ELPBC-cBH3, Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3, or free BH3 peptide for 1 h at 37 or 42 °C. *Indicates p < 0.01 between thermal conditions (two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni
posthoc test for multiple comparisons). Data represents mean of three
experiments ± SEM.
Quantification of cytotoxicity
of CPP-ELPBC drug carriers.
(A) Cytotoxicity of CPP-ELPBC carriers appended with BH3
peptide drug was evaluated by a modified cell survival assay. HeLa
cells were incubated with Arg5-ELPBC-cBH3, Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3, or ELPBC-cBH3 with cleavable
peptide drug cargo for 1 h at 37 or 42 °C. HeLa cells were also
incubated with controls including Arg8-ELPBC-BH3 with noncleavable peptide drug cargo and free BH3 peptide alone.
Cells were washed and returned to complete media for 24 h before cell
survival was quantified by MTS assay. *Indicates p < 0.005 between thermal conditions (two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni
posthoc test for multiple comparisons). (B) Induction of apoptosis
was evaluated by quantification of caspase-3 activity. Caspase-3 activity
was quantified in HeLa cell lysates after treatment with ELPBC-cBH3, Arg5-ELPBC-cBH3, Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3, or free BH3 peptide for 1 h at 37 or 42 °C. *Indicates p < 0.01 between thermal conditions (two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni
posthoc test for multiple comparisons). Data represents mean of three
experiments ± SEM.Comparing the performance of Arg5- and Arg8-ELPBC carriers of BH3 peptide drug allowed the
definition
of nanopeptifier FOM required for thermally controlled cytotoxicity.
Specifically, amplified uptake between 12 and 130 arbitrary units
was necessary to induce a therapeutic effect with BH3 peptide drug
cargo (as defined in Table 2), because Arg5-ELPBC-cBH3 with an amplified uptake of ∼12
showed no efficacy while Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3 with
an amplified uptake of ∼130 showed significant cell death at
42 °C. Leakage uptake of less than 11 arbitrary units was sufficient
to avoid cell death, as cells were safely spared by treatment at 37
°C with Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3, which has a leakage
uptake of 11. These parameters thus defined the FOM that induced significant
cell death at 42 °C, while safely sparing cells at 37 °C
for cells treated with nanopeptifiers armed with BH3 peptide drug.
Other therapeutic payloads, however, will likely require different
FOM for optimized therapeutic effect, further supporting the need
for a tunable amplifier of cellular uptake.Next, the role of
apoptosis in the mechanism of cytotoxicity induced
by Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3 was investigated by the activation
of the effector enzyme caspase-3. Enzymatic activity of caspase-3
was evaluated in cells treated with CPP-ELPBC drug conjugates
using an assay that quantifies fluorescent products from the cleavage
of caspase-specific targets. Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3
showed a significant increase in caspase-3 activity at 42 °C,
as compared to 37 °C (Figure 5B), corroborating
that the controlled cytotoxicity demonstrated in Figure 5A was due to the induction of apoptosis by the BH3 peptide
cargo. Caspase-3 activity was elevated to a lesser extent in Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3 treated cells at 37 °C, however,
this activation did not correlate with enhanced cytotoxicity, suggesting
that a threshold of caspase-3 activity was not met to induce significant
cell death at this temperature. No significant changes in caspase-3
activity were seen between cells treated with Arg5-ELPBC-cBH3, nonfunctionalized ELPBC-cBH3 control, or
free BH3 peptide at 37 or 42 °C. Additionally, hyperthermia alone
was not responsible for changes in caspase-3 activity (Supporting Information Figure S7), supporting
the conclusion that the amplified drug delivery afforded by the Arg8-ELPBC carrier was responsible for controlled cell
death by apoptosis.While our results clearly indicate that
enhanced intracellular
delivery and release of BH3 peptide drug with Arg8-ELPBC-cBH3 is the primary factor that leads to temperature-controlled
cytotoxicity of cancer cells, several ancillary factors may also contribute
to the controlled cytotoxicity observed for the Arg8-ELPBC nanopeptifier. First, the cationic charge contributed to
the BH3 peptide by the residual RVRR peptide following cleavage at
the C-terminus of the linker could potentially enhance its cytotoxicity
by electrostatically localizing the peptide to the mitochondrial membrane.[48] This could lead either to increased interaction
of BH3 with prosurvival proteins anchored in the mitochondrial membrane
or directly amplify the apoptosis cascade by destabilizing the mitochondrial
membrane.[49] Second, mild hyperthermia could
directly contribute to the cytotoxic effect by influencing components
in the apoptotic pathway. Although high lethal temperatures can directly
activate proapoptotic proteins such as Bax and Bak,[50] lower temperatures typical of mild hyperthermia may contribute
to the apoptotic cascade by down-regulation of apoptosis-related proteins,
such as antiapoptotic Bcl-2,[51] or by destabilization
of the mitochondrial membrane,[52] resulting
in cytochrome c release that can initiate activation
of effector enzymes in the apoptotic cascade. We did not observe that
mild hyperthermia alone led to apoptosis, suggesting that the effects
of heat synergized with the delivery of BH3 peptide, which further
disturbed the balance of apoptosis-related proteins and led to significant
cell death. Together these factors, enhanced proapoptotic BH3 peptide
delivery, charge conferred by the RVRR peptide linker, and mild hyperthermia,
may act synergistically to provide controlled cytotoxicity at conditions
of mild hyperthermia while sparing cells at physiologic temperature.The nanopeptifier platform described here provides two novel advances
to the field of cancer-targeted cellular uptake. First, the nanopeptifier
provides controlled cellular uptake via an extrinsic thermal trigger
that is independent of the heterogeneity of intrinsic tumor characteristics
exploited by other tumor-targeted delivery systems, such as upregulated
receptors, overexpressed enzymes, and depressed tumor pH. Second,
the modular design of the nanopeptifier affords tunable amplification
of cellular uptake that can provide a selective therapeutic effect
specific to a drug cargo of interest. This genetically encoded drug
delivery system thus has the potential to control the intracellular
delivery and cytotoxicity of a variety of anticancer therapeutics
across a range of solid tumors.
Authors: Todd J Harris; Geoffrey von Maltzahn; Matthew E Lord; Ji-Ho Park; Amit Agrawal; Dal-Hee Min; Michael J Sailor; Sangeeta N Bhatia Journal: Small Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Emilia S Olson; Tao Jiang; Todd A Aguilera; Quyen T Nguyen; Lesley G Ellies; Miriam Scadeng; Roger Y Tsien Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yong Tao Li; Young Min Kwon; Gerald J Spangrude; Jun F Liang; Hee Sun Chung; Yoon Jeong Park; Victor C Yang Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Craig L Duvall; Anthony J Convertine; Danielle S W Benoit; Allan S Hoffman; Patrick S Stayton Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: H B Muss; A D Thor; D A Berry; T Kute; E T Liu; F Koerner; C T Cirrincione; D R Budman; W C Wood; M Barcos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-05-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Judy R James; Yong Gao; Victor C Soon; Stephen M Topper; Andriy Babsky; Navin Bansal Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Tianzhi Luo; Michael A David; Lucas C Dunshee; Rebecca A Scott; Morgan A Urello; Christopher Price; Kristi L Kiick Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Sarah R MacEwan; Isaac Weitzhandler; Ingo Hoffmann; Jan Genzer; Michael Gradzielski; Ashutosh Chilkoti Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Linying Li; Nan K Li; Qing Tu; Owen Im; Chia-Kuei Mo; Wei Han; William H Fuss; Nick J Carroll; Ashutosh Chilkoti; Yaroslava G Yingling; Stefan Zauscher; Gabriel P López Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 6.988