INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between young normal asymptomatic adults and older normal asymptomatic adults without localized segmental disc degeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standing sagittal radiographs of the whole spine including the pelvis in 342 adult male volunteers (Group 1: n = 184, average age 21.2 years, range 19-28 vs. Group 2: n = 158, average age 63.8 years, range 53-79) were analyzed prospectively. Volunteers with history of spine operation, spinal disease, chronic pain in their back or legs, scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, 1-3 segmental disc space narrowing, and/or compression fractures in radiographs were excluded. The following parameters were included: thoracic kyphosis between T5 upper endplate (UEP) and T12 lower endplate (LEP), thoracolumbar kyphosis (T10 UEP - L2 LEP), T12 LEP-horizontal (H) angle (minus denotes EP above the H line), lumbar lordosis (T12 LEP - S1 UEP), lower lumbar lordosis (L4 UEP - S1 UEP), sacral slope, pelvic incidence and distances from C7 plumb/T12 plumb to the postero-superior endplate of S1. Group 2 (old men group) demonstrated larger thoracic kyphosis (30.1° ± 8.6° vs. 21.1° ± 7.8° in Group 1, P < 0.001), thoracolumbar kyphosis (10.0° ± 7.5° vs. 2.8° ± 7.1° in Group 1, P < 0.001), total lumbar lordosis at T12-S1 (57.3° ± 8.8° vs. 52.2° ± 9.2° in Group 1, P < 0.001), lower lumbar lordosis at L4-S1 (39.4° ± 6.7° vs. 32.4° ± 6.4° in Group 1, P < 0.001), a higher ratio of lower to total lumbar lordosis (69.5 ± 11.6 vs. 62.7 ± 10.6 % in Group 1, P < 0.001) and T12 LEP-H angle (-20.4° ± 5.7° vs. -15.7° ± 5.1° in Group 1, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in sacral slope (36.5° ± 7.3° in Group 1 vs. 36.8° ± 6.7° in Group 2, P = 0.67) and pelvic incidence (46.5° ± 7.7° in Group 1 vs. 48.2° ± 8.5° in Group 2, P = 0.06). There was no significant difference in the measurement of distance from C7 plumb to the postero-superior endplate of S1 (-0.7 ± 2.4 cm in Group 1 vs. -0.3 ± 2.7 cm in Group 2, P = 0.197). However, the distance from T12 plumb to the postero-superior endplate of S1 (-0.7 ± 1.7 cm in Group 1 vs. -2.2 ± 1.7 cm in Group 2, P < 0.001) demonstrated a significant difference. CONCLUSION: The old men group demonstrated a significant increase in thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, total and lower lumbar lordosis, a higher ratio of lower to total lumbar lordosis, and a longer distance from T12 plumb to the postero-superior endplate of S1 without changes in sacral slope and global sagittal balance.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between young normal asymptomatic adults and older normal asymptomatic adults without localized segmental disc degeneration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standing sagittal radiographs of the whole spine including the pelvis in 342 adult male volunteers (Group 1: n = 184, average age 21.2 years, range 19-28 vs. Group 2: n = 158, average age 63.8 years, range 53-79) were analyzed prospectively. Volunteers with history of spine operation, spinal disease, chronic pain in their back or legs, scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, 1-3 segmental disc space narrowing, and/or compression fractures in radiographs were excluded. The following parameters were included: thoracic kyphosis between T5 upper endplate (UEP) and T12 lower endplate (LEP), thoracolumbar kyphosis (T10 UEP - L2 LEP), T12 LEP-horizontal (H) angle (minus denotes EP above the H line), lumbar lordosis (T12 LEP - S1 UEP), lower lumbar lordosis (L4 UEP - S1 UEP), sacral slope, pelvic incidence and distances from C7 plumb/T12 plumb to the postero-superior endplate of S1. Group 2 (old men group) demonstrated larger thoracic kyphosis (30.1° ± 8.6° vs. 21.1° ± 7.8° in Group 1, P < 0.001), thoracolumbar kyphosis (10.0° ± 7.5° vs. 2.8° ± 7.1° in Group 1, P < 0.001), total lumbar lordosis at T12-S1 (57.3° ± 8.8° vs. 52.2° ± 9.2° in Group 1, P < 0.001), lower lumbar lordosis at L4-S1 (39.4° ± 6.7° vs. 32.4° ± 6.4° in Group 1, P < 0.001), a higher ratio of lower to total lumbar lordosis (69.5 ± 11.6 vs. 62.7 ± 10.6 % in Group 1, P < 0.001) and T12 LEP-H angle (-20.4° ± 5.7° vs. -15.7° ± 5.1° in Group 1, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in sacral slope (36.5° ± 7.3° in Group 1 vs. 36.8° ± 6.7° in Group 2, P = 0.67) and pelvic incidence (46.5° ± 7.7° in Group 1 vs. 48.2° ± 8.5° in Group 2, P = 0.06). There was no significant difference in the measurement of distance from C7 plumb to the postero-superior endplate of S1 (-0.7 ± 2.4 cm in Group 1 vs. -0.3 ± 2.7 cm in Group 2, P = 0.197). However, the distance from T12 plumb to the postero-superior endplate of S1 (-0.7 ± 1.7 cm in Group 1 vs. -2.2 ± 1.7 cm in Group 2, P < 0.001) demonstrated a significant difference. CONCLUSION: The old men group demonstrated a significant increase in thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, total and lower lumbar lordosis, a higher ratio of lower to total lumbar lordosis, and a longer distance from T12 plumb to the postero-superior endplate of S1 without changes in sacral slope and global sagittal balance.
Authors: Steven D Glassman; Keith Bridwell; John R Dimar; William Horton; Sigurd Berven; Frank Schwab Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: William C Horton; Courtney W Brown; Keith H Bridwell; Steven D Glassman; Se-Il Suk; Charles W Cha Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468