PURPOSE: Radiotherapy of liver malignancies shows promising results (radioembolization, stereotactic irradiation, interstitial brachytherapy). Regardless of the route of application, a certain amount of nontumorous liver parenchyma will be collaterally damaged by radiation. The functional reserve may be significantly reduced with an impact on further treatment planning. Monitoring of radiation-induced liver damage by imaging is neither established nor validated. We performed an analysis to correlate the histopathological presence of radiation-induced liver damage with functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilizing hepatobiliary contrast media (Gd-BOPTA). METHODS: Patients undergoing local high-dose-rate brachytherapy for whom a follow-up hepatobiliary MRI within 120 days after radiotherapy as well as an evaluable liver biopsy from radiation-exposed liver tissue within 7 days before MRI were retrospectively identified. Planning computed tomography (CT)/dosimetry was merged to the CT-documentation of the liver biopsy and to the MRI. Presence/absence of radiation-induced liver damage (histopathology) and Gd-BOPTA uptake (MRI) as well as the dose applied during brachytherapy at the site of tissue sampling was determined. RESULTS: Fourteen biopsies from eight patients were evaluated. In all cases with histopathological evidence of radiation-induced liver damage (n = 11), no uptake of Gd-BOPTA was seen. In the remaining three, cases no radiation-induced liver damage but Gd-BOPTA uptake was seen. Presence of radiation-induced liver damage and absence of Gd-BOPTA uptake was correlated with a former high-dose exposition. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of hepatobiliary MRI contrast media uptake in radiation-exposed liver parenchyma may indicate radiation-induced liver damage. Confirmatory studies are warranted.
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy of liver malignancies shows promising results (radioembolization, stereotactic irradiation, interstitial brachytherapy). Regardless of the route of application, a certain amount of nontumorous liver parenchyma will be collaterally damaged by radiation. The functional reserve may be significantly reduced with an impact on further treatment planning. Monitoring of radiation-induced liver damage by imaging is neither established nor validated. We performed an analysis to correlate the histopathological presence of radiation-induced liver damage with functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilizing hepatobiliary contrast media (Gd-BOPTA). METHODS:Patients undergoing local high-dose-rate brachytherapy for whom a follow-up hepatobiliary MRI within 120 days after radiotherapy as well as an evaluable liver biopsy from radiation-exposed liver tissue within 7 days before MRI were retrospectively identified. Planning computed tomography (CT)/dosimetry was merged to the CT-documentation of the liver biopsy and to the MRI. Presence/absence of radiation-induced liver damage (histopathology) and Gd-BOPTA uptake (MRI) as well as the dose applied during brachytherapy at the site of tissue sampling was determined. RESULTS: Fourteen biopsies from eight patients were evaluated. In all cases with histopathological evidence of radiation-induced liver damage (n = 11), no uptake of Gd-BOPTA was seen. In the remaining three, cases no radiation-induced liver damage but Gd-BOPTA uptake was seen. Presence of radiation-induced liver damage and absence of Gd-BOPTA uptake was correlated with a former high-dose exposition. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of hepatobiliary MRI contrast media uptake in radiation-exposed liver parenchyma may indicate radiation-induced liver damage. Confirmatory studies are warranted.
Authors: Judit Boda-Heggemann; Ulrike Attenberger; Johannes Budjan; Anika Jahnke; Lennart Jahnke; Lena Vogel; Anna O Simeonova-Chergou; Carsten Herskind; Frederik Wenz; Frank Lohr Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Judit Boda-Heggemann; Anika Jahnke; Mark K H Chan; Leila S Ghaderi Ardekani; Peter Hunold; Jost Philipp Schäfer; Stefan Huttenlocher; Stefan Wurster; Dirk Rades; Guido Hildebrandt; Frank Lohr; Jürgen Dunst; Frederik Wenz; Oliver Blanck Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Max Seidensticker; Ricarda Seidensticker; Robert Damm; Konrad Mohnike; Maciej Pech; Bruno Sangro; Peter Hass; Peter Wust; Siegfried Kropf; Günther Gademann; Jens Ricke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elmar M Merkle; Christoph J Zech; Carlo Bartolozzi; Mustafa R Bashir; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Alexander Huppertz; Jeong Min Lee; Jens Ricke; Michiie Sakamoto; Claude B Sirlin; Sheng-Long Ye; Mengsu Zeng Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-06-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christian Richter; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Ronald J H Borra; Felix Voigt; Steffen Löck; Dan G Duda; Alexander R Guimaraes; Theodore S Hong; Thomas R Bortfeld; Joao Seco Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-04-26
Authors: Pouya Jelvehgaran; Jeffrey D Steinberg; Artem Khmelinskii; Gerben Borst; Ji-Ying Song; Niels de Wit; Daniel M de Bruin; Marcel van Herk Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 3.481