Literature DB >> 27393400

MRI morphologic alterations after liver SBRT : Direct dose correlation with intermodal matching.

Judit Boda-Heggemann1, Ulrike Attenberger2, Johannes Budjan2, Anika Jahnke3, Lennart Jahnke3, Lena Vogel3, Anna O Simeonova-Chergou3, Carsten Herskind3, Frederik Wenz3, Frank Lohr3.   

Abstract

AIM: CT morphologic and histopathologic alterations have been reported after SBRT. We analyzed the correlation of MRI morphologic alterations with radiation doses to assess the potential for MRI-based dose-effect correlation in healthy liver tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MRI data of 24 patients with liver metastases 7±3 weeks after image-guided SBRT in deep-inspiration breath-hold were retrospectively analyzed. MRI images were intermodally matched to the planning CT and corresponding dose distribution. Absolute doses were converted to EQD2,α/β =x with α/β values of 2, 3 for healthy liver tissue, 8 Gy for modelled predamaged liver tissue and 10 Gy for tumor tissue.
RESULTS: A central nonenhancing area was observed within the isodose lines of nominally 48.2 ± 15.2 Gy, EQD2Gy/α/β =10 92.5 ± 27.7 Gy. Contrast-enhancement around the central nonenhancing area was observed within the isodose lines of nominally 46.9 ± 15.3 Gy, EQD2Gy/α/β =10 90.5 ± 28.3 Gy. Outside the high-dose volume, in the beam path, characteristic sharply defined, nonblurred MRI morphologic alterations were observed that corresponded with the following isodose lines: T1-intensity changes occurred at isodose lines of nominally 21.9 ± 6.7 Gy (EQD2,α/β =2 42.5 ± 8.7 Gy, EQD2,α/β =3 38.5 ± 7.6 Gy, EQD2,α/β =8 30.2 ±6.3 Gy). T2-hyper/hypointensity was observed within isodose lines of nominally 22.4 ± 6.6 Gy (EQD2,α/β=2 42.7 ± 8.1 Gy, EQD2,α/β=3 38.7 ± 7 Gy; EQD2,α/β=8 30.5 ± 5.9 Gy).
CONCLUSIONS: Using deformable matching, direct spatial/dosimetric correlation of SBRT-induced changes in liver tissue was possible. In the PTV high-dose region, a central nonenhancing area and peripheral contrast medium accumulation was observed. Beam path doses of 38-42 Gy (EQD2,α/β =2-3) induce characteristic MRI morphologic alterations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep inspiration breath-hold; Liver metastases; Magnetic resonance imaging; Normal tissue reactions; Stereotactic body radiation therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27393400     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-1013-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  45 in total

1.  ¹¹¹In OctreoScan SPECT-MRI fusion for the detection of a pancreatic insulinoma.

Authors:  Valeria M Moncayo; Diego R Martin; Juan M Sarmiento; Blazej Zbytek; Tim Fox; David M Schuster
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.794

2.  A new approach to quantifying lung damage after stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  David A Palma; John R van Sörnsen de Koste; Wilko F A R Verbakel; Suresh Senan
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 3.  Partial volume tolerance of the liver to radiation.

Authors:  Laura A Dawson; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 4.  Imaging changes after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung and liver tumors.

Authors:  Simon S Lo; Bin S Teh; Jian Z Wang; Zhibin Huang; Jennifer Zook; Tracy Price; Nina A Mayr; John C Grecula; Robert D Timmerman; Higinia R Cardenes
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.512

5.  Comparing rigid and deformable dose registration for high dose thoracic re-irradiation.

Authors:  Sashendra Senthi; Gwendolyn H M J Griffioen; John R van Sörnsen de Koste; Ben J Slotman; Suresh Senan
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Threshold doses for focal liver reaction after stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma depend on liver function: evaluation on magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Authors:  Naoko Sanuki; Atsuya Takeda; Yohei Oku; Takahisa Eriguchi; Shuichi Nishimura; Yosuke Aoki; Tomikazu Mizuno; Shogo Iwabuchi; Etsuo Kunieda
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Radiological changes after stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer.

Authors:  Max Dahele; David Palma; Frank Lagerwaard; Ben Slotman; Suresh Senan
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Short-term and long-term reproducibility of lung tumor position using active breathing control (ABC).

Authors:  Rojano Kashani; Rojano Koshani; James M Balter; James A Hayman; George T Henning; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Survival outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy for 79 Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hideomi Yamashita; Hiroshi Onishi; Naoya Murakami; Yasuo Matsumoto; Yukinori Matsuo; Takuma Nomiya; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 10.  Normal tissue toxicity after small field hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation.

Authors:  Michael T Milano; Louis S Constine; Paul Okunieff
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  5 in total

1.  Direct dose correlation of MRI morphologic alterations of healthy liver tissue after robotic liver SBRT.

Authors:  Judit Boda-Heggemann; Anika Jahnke; Mark K H Chan; Leila S Ghaderi Ardekani; Peter Hunold; Jost Philipp Schäfer; Stefan Huttenlocher; Stefan Wurster; Dirk Rades; Guido Hildebrandt; Frank Lohr; Jürgen Dunst; Frederik Wenz; Oliver Blanck
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Pathology and images of radiation-induced hepatitis: a review article.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Takamatsu; Kazuto Kozaka; Satoshi Kobayashi; Norihide Yoneda; Kotaro Yoshida; Dai Inoue; Azusa Kitao; Takahiro Ogi; Tetsuya Minami; Wataru Kouda; Tomoyasu Kumano; Nobukazu Fuwa; Osamu Matsui; Toshifumi Gabata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Impact of potentially variable RBE in liver proton therapy.

Authors:  Yizheng Chen; Clemens Grassberger; Junli Li; Theodore S Hong; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Comparison of liver exposure in CT-guided high-dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy versus SBRT in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Franziska Walter; Lukas Nierer; Maya Rottler; Anna Sophie Duque; Helmut Weingandt; Justus Well; Roel Shpani; Guillaume Landry; Max Seidensticker; Florian Streitparth; Jens Ricke; Claus Belka; Stefanie Corradini
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 5.  Radiomics for liver tumours.

Authors:  Constantin Dreher; Philipp Linde; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Bettina Baessler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.621

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.