Leif I Solberg1, A Lauren Crain, Lisa Rubenstein, Jürgen Unützer, Robin R Whitebird, Arne Beck. 1. the HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN; the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA; the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle; and Kaiser Permanante Colorado, Denver.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is an important component of patient-centered care, but there is little information about its use in the primary care of depression, so we sought to study its frequency in usual care as reported by patients. METHODS: Telephone interview of 1168 depressed patients taking antidepressants in 88 Minnesota primary care clinics who were identified from pharmacy claims data soon after a prescription for an antidepressant. We measured depression severity with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and used a composite measure of SDM that reflected patient involvement in treatment decisions. RESULTS: These patients reported an average score for SDM of 50.7 (standard deviation, 32.8) on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores equate with greater SDM. In univariate analyses, the largest differences among scores were for age (scores of 58, 53, 45, and 33 for those aged 18-34, 35-49, 50-64, and >64 years, respectively; P < .0001); duration of treatment (a score of 56.6 on treatment <6 weeks vs 45.5 if longer; P < .001); and other treatments in the past 6 months (60.5 if yes vs. 46.0 if no; P = .001). SDM was not associated with any clinic characteristics, but it was correlated with patient-reported quality of care (r = 0.48; P < .001). Multivariate analyses confirmed some of these findings while showing a more complex set of relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with depression and those who have been in treatment longer report much less SDM in their care. Improving SDM, especially for these groups, may be an important target for improving patient experience and perceived quality.
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is an important component of patient-centered care, but there is little information about its use in the primary care of depression, so we sought to study its frequency in usual care as reported by patients. METHODS: Telephone interview of 1168 depressedpatients taking antidepressants in 88 Minnesota primary care clinics who were identified from pharmacy claims data soon after a prescription for an antidepressant. We measured depression severity with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and used a composite measure of SDM that reflected patient involvement in treatment decisions. RESULTS: These patients reported an average score for SDM of 50.7 (standard deviation, 32.8) on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores equate with greater SDM. In univariate analyses, the largest differences among scores were for age (scores of 58, 53, 45, and 33 for those aged 18-34, 35-49, 50-64, and >64 years, respectively; P < .0001); duration of treatment (a score of 56.6 on treatment <6 weeks vs 45.5 if longer; P < .001); and other treatments in the past 6 months (60.5 if yes vs. 46.0 if no; P = .001). SDM was not associated with any clinic characteristics, but it was correlated with patient-reported quality of care (r = 0.48; P < .001). Multivariate analyses confirmed some of these findings while showing a more complex set of relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with depression and those who have been in treatment longer report much less SDM in their care. Improving SDM, especially for these groups, may be an important target for improving patient experience and perceived quality.
Entities:
Keywords:
Decision Making; Depression; Patient Satisfaction; Patient-Centered Care; Primary Health Care
Authors: Patrick J Raue; Herbert C Schulberg; Martha L Bruce; Samprit Banerjee; Amanda Artis; Maria Espejo; Idalia Catalan; Sara Romero Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Katarina Arandjelovic; Harris A Eyre; Eric Lenze; Ajeet B Singh; Michael Berk; Chad Bousman Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2017-10-29 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Ryan Abbott; Donald D Chang; Harris A Eyre; Chad A Bousman; David A Merrill; Helen Lavretsky Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Sascha M Keij; Joyce E de Boer; Anne M Stiggelbout; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ellen Peters; Saïda Moaddine; Marleen Kunneman; Arwen H Pieterse Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Kevin Mertz; Romil F Shah; Sara L Eppler; Jeffrey Yao; Marc Safran; Ariel Palanca; Serena S Hu; Michael Gardner; Derek F Amanatullah; Robin N Kamal Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Kevin Mertz; Sara Eppler; Jeffrey Yao; Derek F Amanatullah; Loretta Chou; Kirkham B Wood; Marc Safran; Robert Steffner; Michael Gardner; Robin Kamal Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez; Amado Rivero-Santana; Juan Antonio Sanchez-Afonso; Jeanette Perez-Ramos; Carmen Luisa Castellano-Fuentes; Karen Sepucha; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar Journal: Health Expect Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Magenta B Simmons; Aurora Elmes; Joanne E McKenzie; Lyndal Trevena; Sarah E Hetrick Journal: Health Expect Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 3.377