Literature DB >> 24610182

How much shared decision making occurs in usual primary care of depression?

Leif I Solberg1, A Lauren Crain, Lisa Rubenstein, Jürgen Unützer, Robin R Whitebird, Arne Beck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is an important component of patient-centered care, but there is little information about its use in the primary care of depression, so we sought to study its frequency in usual care as reported by patients.
METHODS: Telephone interview of 1168 depressed patients taking antidepressants in 88 Minnesota primary care clinics who were identified from pharmacy claims data soon after a prescription for an antidepressant. We measured depression severity with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and used a composite measure of SDM that reflected patient involvement in treatment decisions.
RESULTS: These patients reported an average score for SDM of 50.7 (standard deviation, 32.8) on a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores equate with greater SDM. In univariate analyses, the largest differences among scores were for age (scores of 58, 53, 45, and 33 for those aged 18-34, 35-49, 50-64, and >64 years, respectively; P < .0001); duration of treatment (a score of 56.6 on treatment <6 weeks vs 45.5 if longer; P < .001); and other treatments in the past 6 months (60.5 if yes vs. 46.0 if no; P = .001). SDM was not associated with any clinic characteristics, but it was correlated with patient-reported quality of care (r = 0.48; P < .001). Multivariate analyses confirmed some of these findings while showing a more complex set of relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with depression and those who have been in treatment longer report much less SDM in their care. Improving SDM, especially for these groups, may be an important target for improving patient experience and perceived quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision Making; Depression; Patient Satisfaction; Patient-Centered Care; Primary Health Care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24610182     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  19 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Shared Decision-Making for Elderly Depressed Minority Primary Care Patients.

Authors:  Patrick J Raue; Herbert C Schulberg; Martha L Bruce; Samprit Banerjee; Amanda Artis; Maria Espejo; Idalia Catalan; Sara Romero
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 2.  The role of depression pharmacogenetic decision support tools in shared decision making.

Authors:  Katarina Arandjelovic; Harris A Eyre; Eric Lenze; Ajeet B Singh; Michael Berk; Chad Bousman
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  Pharmacogenetic Decision Support Tools: A New Paradigm for Late-Life Depression?

Authors:  Ryan Abbott; Donald D Chang; Harris A Eyre; Chad A Bousman; David A Merrill; Helen Lavretsky
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  How are patient-related characteristics associated with shared decision-making about treatment? A scoping review of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Sascha M Keij; Joyce E de Boer; Anne M Stiggelbout; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ellen Peters; Saïda Moaddine; Marleen Kunneman; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  A Simple Goal Elicitation Tool Improves Shared Decision Making in Outpatient Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kevin Mertz; Romil F Shah; Sara L Eppler; Jeffrey Yao; Marc Safran; Ariel Palanca; Serena S Hu; Michael Gardner; Derek F Amanatullah; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Patient Perceptions Correlate Weakly With Observed Patient Involvement in Decision-making in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Mertz; Sara Eppler; Jeffrey Yao; Derek F Amanatullah; Loretta Chou; Kirkham B Wood; Marc Safran; Robert Steffner; Michael Gardner; Robin Kamal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Mental health and social service needs for mental health service users in Japan: a cross-sectional survey of client- and staff-perceived needs.

Authors:  Yuki Miyamoto; Rieko Hashimoto-Koichi; Miki Akiyama; Soichi Takamura
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2015-04-10

8.  Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with depression: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez; Amado Rivero-Santana; Juan Antonio Sanchez-Afonso; Jeanette Perez-Ramos; Carmen Luisa Castellano-Fuentes; Karen Sepucha; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Right choice, right time: Evaluation of an online decision aid for youth depression.

Authors:  Magenta B Simmons; Aurora Elmes; Joanne E McKenzie; Lyndal Trevena; Sarah E Hetrick
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Competing priorities in treatment decision-making: a US national survey of individuals with depression and clinicians who treat depression.

Authors:  Paul J Barr; Rachel C Forcino; Manish Mishra; Rachel Blitzer; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.