Literature DB >> 24609519

Fabricated nanoparticles: current status and potential phytotoxic threats.

Tushar Yadav1, Alka A Mungray, Arvind K Mungray.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology offers unique attributes to various industrial and consumer sectors, and has become a topic of high interest to scientific communities across the world. Our society has greatly benefitted from nanotechnology already, in that many products with novel properties and wide applicability have been developed and commercialized. However, the increased production and use of nanomaterials have raised concerns about the environmental fate and toxicological implications of nanoparticles and nanomaterials. Research has revealed that various nanomaterials may be hazardous to living organisms. Among biota, plants are widely exposed to released nanomaterials and are sensitive to their effects. The accumulation of nannmaterials in the environment is a potential threat, not only because of potential damage to plants hut also because nanoparticles may enter the food chain. Although the literature that addresses the safety of nanoproducts is growing, little is known about the mechanisms by which these materials produce toxicity on natural species, including humans. In this paper, we have reviewed the literature relevant to what phytotoxic impact fabricated nanoparticles (e.g., carbon nanotubes, metallic and metal oxide nanoparticles, and certain other nanomaterials) have on plants. Nanoparticles produce several effects on plant physiology and morphology. Nanoparticles are known to affect root structure, seed germination, and cellular metabolism. Nanoparticles inhibit growth, induce oxidative stress, morphogenetic abnormalities and produce clastogenic disturbances in several plant species. The size, shape and surface coating of NPs play an important role in determining their level of toxicity. Of course, the dose, route of administration, type of dispersion media, and environmental exposure also contribute to how toxic nanoparticles are to plants. Currently, nanotoxicity studies are only in their initial phases of development and more research will be required to identify the actual threat nanoproducts pose to the plant system. To date, data show that there is a large variation in the phytotoxicity caused by different NPs. Moreover, the studies conducted thus far have mostly relied on microscopy to detect effects. Studies that incorporate measures and analyses undertaken with more modern tools are needed. Among new data that are most urgently needed on NPs is how fabricated NPs behave once released into the environment, and how exposure to them may affect plant resistance, metabolic pathways, and plant genetic responses. In this review, we have attempted to collect, present and summarize recent findings from the literature on nanoparticle toxicity in plants. To strengthen the analysis, we propose a scheme for accessing NP toxicity. We also recommend how the potential challenges presented by increased production and release of NPs should be addressed. It is our belief and recommendation that every nanomaterial-based product be subjected to appropriate toxicity and associated assessment before being commercialized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24609519     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04411-8_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0179-5953            Impact factor:   7.563


  7 in total

1.  Synthesis of Iron, Zinc, and Manganese Nanofertilizers, Using Andean Blueberry Extract, and Their Effect in the Growth of Cabbage and Lupin Plants.

Authors:  Erika Murgueitio-Herrera; César E Falconí; Luis Cumbal; Josselyn Gómez; Karina Yanchatipán; Alejandro Tapia; Kevin Martínez; Izar Sinde-Gonzalez; Theofilos Toulkeridis
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 5.719

2.  Physio-chemical responses of exogenous calcium nanoparticle and putrescine polyamine in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.).

Authors:  Leyla Badihi; Mahyar Gerami; Davood Akbarinodeh; Mohammad Shokrzadeh; Moazzameh Ramezani
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2021-02-02

3.  Antibacterial and Antifungal Studies of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles against Plant Parasitic Nematode Meloidogyne incognita, Plant Pathogens Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium oxysporum.

Authors:  Masudulla Khan; Azhar U Khan; Nina Bogdanchikova; Diana Garibo
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Cross-Talk Immunity of PEDOT:PSS Pressure Sensing Arrays with Gold Nanoparticle Incorporation.

Authors:  Rajat Subhra Karmakar; Yu-Jen Lu; Yi Fu; Kuo-Chen Wei; Shun-Hsiang Chan; Ming-Chung Wu; Jyh-Wei Lee; Tzu-Kang Lin; Jer-Chyi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Nanotechnology: from In Vivo Imaging System to Controlled Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Maria Mir; Saba Ishtiaq; Samreen Rabia; Maryam Khatoon; Ahmad Zeb; Gul Majid Khan; Asim Ur Rehman; Fakhar Ud Din
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.703

Review 6.  Metal/Metalloid-Based Nanomaterials for Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance: An Overview of the Mechanisms.

Authors:  Mohammad Sarraf; Kanchan Vishwakarma; Vinod Kumar; Namira Arif; Susmita Das; Riya Johnson; Edappayil Janeeshma; Jos T Puthur; Sasan Aliniaeifard; Devendra Kumar Chauhan; Masayuki Fujita; Mirza Hasanuzzaman
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25

7.  Relative expression of microRNAs, apoptosis, and ultrastructure anomalies induced by gold nanoparticles in Trachyderma hispida (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).

Authors:  Saeed El-Ashram; Dalia Abdel Moneim Kheirallah; Lamia Moustafa El-Samad; Noura A Toto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.