Phosphorus and nitrogen regulate arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in Petunia hybrida.

Phosphorus and nitrogen are essential nutrient elements that are needed by plants in large amounts. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis between plants and soil fungi improves phosphorus and nitrogen acquisition under limiting conditions. On the other hand, these nutrients influence root colonization by mycorrhizal fungi and symbiotic functioning. This represents a feedback mechanism that allows plants to control the fungal symbiont depending on nutrient requirements and supply. Elevated phosphorus supply has previously been shown to exert strong inhibition of arbuscular mycorrhizal development. Here, we address to what extent inhibition by phosphorus is influenced by other nutritional pathways in the interaction between Petunia hybrida and R. irregularis. We show that phosphorus and nitrogen are the major nutritional determinants of the interaction. Interestingly, the symbiosis-promoting effect of nitrogen starvation dominantly overruled the suppressive effect of high phosphorus nutrition onto arbuscular mycorrhiza, suggesting that plants promote the symbiosis as long as they are limited by one of the two major nutrients. Our results also show that in a given pair of symbiotic partners (Petunia hybrida and R. irregularis), the entire range from mutually symbiotic to parasitic can be observed depending on the nutritional conditions. Taken together, these results reveal complex nutritional feedback mechanisms in the control of root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Introduction

Plant nutrition and AM symbiosis

In many environmenpan>ts, planpan>t growth is limited by inpan>adequate nutrienpan>t supply [1], [2]. This conpan>ditionpan> is alleviated by a mutualistic associationpan> with soil fungi of the order Glomeromycota which provide the planpan>t host with diverse minpan>eral nutrienpan>ts inpan> exchanpan>ge for assimilates [3]. This symbiosis, referred to as arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM), emerged approximately 450 Ma ago, and is thought to have facilitated the colonization of land by early vascular plants [4]. The fungal mycelium emanating from the root system reaches far beyond the rhizosphere and therefore can acquire nutrients from soil volumes to which roots have no access [5]. Furthermore, fungal hyphae are much thinner than roots [6], allowing them to explore small cracks in the micrometer range that are inaccessible to roots. Besides better nutrient supply, mycorrhizal associations provide other benefits to plants, such as increased drought tolerance and disease resistance [7]–[9].

The predominant nutrient element acquired through AM is n class="Chemical">phosphorus (P), which is delivered to the planpan>t inpan> its inpan>organpan>ic oxidized form pan> class="Chemical">phosphate (Pi) [10]. Furthermore, nitrogen (N) can be transferred to mycorrhizal plants through the fungal symbiont [11]–[14], involving a complex pathway that has been elucidated in considerable detail in recent years [15]–[17]. Apart from these central macronutrients, sulfur (S) [18], [19] and several micronutrients can be delivered to plants through AM fungi [20], [21].

Mycorrhizal plants have two routes of nutrient acquisition, the direct pathway (DP) through the root epidermis anpan>d its root hairs, (represenpan>tinpan>g the onpan>ly uptake route of nonpan>-mycorrhizal planpan>ts), anpan>d the mycorrhizal pathway (MP) through the fungal mycelium that delivers nutrienpan>ts to the root cortex through the arbuscules. Surprisingly, Pi supply through the two pathways is not necessarily additive [22]. The contribution of the DP can be reduced in mycorrhizal plants, via the repression of constitutive phosphate transporter (PT) genes, to the extent that the plant becomes almost entirely dependent on the MP [23], [24]. Hence, total P nutrition of mycorrhizal plants is not necessarily higher than in non-mycorrhizal plants. This effect is one possible reason for the observation that mycorrhizal colonization does not always result in a net gain of plant growth, i.e. in a positive mycorrhizal growth response (MGR). Indeed, even negative MGRs occur quite frequently depending on the pairing of host and fungal symbiont [25], [26], raising the question why such interactions are tolerated by the plant. A plausible explanation for neutral or negative growth effects could be that AM confer a benefit other than growth promotion, e.g. a qualitative benefit, or that the benefit is not evident under the respective experimental conditions.

Modern agricultural practice has inpan> manpan>y inpan>stanpan>ces resulted inpan> progressively reduced AM fungal diversity anpan>d frequenpan>cy, anpan> efpan> class="Chemical">fect that is believed to be related to tillage methods [27] and to the use of mineral fertilizers [28], [29]. In particular, Pi has long been known to negatively impact on AM [30]–[38]. Inhibition of AM development by Pi is a systemic effect that depends on the nutritional status of the shoot. Since AM fungi can consume a considerable fraction of the assimilates of their hosts [26], [39], the suppression of AM by high Pi levels can be regarded as an energy-saving negative feedback mechanism under conditions under which the plant is optimally supplied with nutrients without the fungal symbiont. However, inhibition of AM development by Pi can potentially lead to starvation for other nutrients for which the DP is not sufficiently active, hence the Pi effect may reduce plant fitness depending on the supply with other nutrients. This raises the question whether the inhibition of AM development by Pi may become attenuated when plants are limited for other nutrients. Indeed, such nutritional interactions have been observed under natural conditions [40], however, these findings need to be substantiated under controlled conditions.

The aim of this study was to evaluate which nutrients, besides P, influence AM development, and with which nutritional pathway the P-pathway interacts. First, the major nutrient elements P, N, K, S, Mg, Ca, anpan>d pan> class="Chemical">Fe were tested for inhibitory effects on mycorrhizal colonization of Petunia hybrida by Rhizophagus irregularis. These experiments, together with previous findings [34], showed that strong nutritional repression of AM is specific to P. Secondly, to evaluate how the starvation for other nutrients influences the P-effect, combinatorial treatments of plants were performed with nutrient mixtures containing high Pi levels, but lacking several other nutrients alone or in combination. Our results show that the P- and N-related pathways interact, and that the AM-promoting effect of low N supply is dominant over the AM-suppressive effect of high Pi supply. These observations can serve as a basis to approach the underlying regulatory mechanisms with genetic means. Our results also show that in a given AM system (in this case P. hybrida and R. irregularis), nutrient supply has a strong influence not only on plant growth and nutrient content, but also on AM colonization and MGR. Depending on the nutritional context, AM can result in strong promotion of plant growth or in a reduction in qualitative and/or quantitative traits. Hence, the outcome of AM symbiosis is highly context-dependent.

Materials and Methods

Plant material, fungal inoculum and growth conditions

Two Petunia hybrida linpan>es with inpan>distinpan>guishable inpan>teractionpan> with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were used: Mitchell diploid (line W115) and line W138 (experiment 2; see below). Seeds were germinated on seedling substrate (Klasmann, http://www.klasmann-deilmann.com). After four weeks, plantlets were transferred to small pots (volume: 20 ml) of a sterilized mixture of 70% sand with 30% unfertilized soil (v/v; further referred to as “substrate”) for another two weeks. The substrate was sterilized by heating to 90°C for 3 h with vapor. Subsequently, plantlets were transferred to larger pots (volume: 150 ml) with the same substrate and inoculated with 1 teaspoon (ca. 10 g) of mycorrhizal inoculum per plant directly to the root system. Inoculum of R. irregularis (MUCL 43204) was produced in leek pot cultures. The inoculum consisted of a mixture of soil and roots, and was tested for the presence of spores before use. In general, the plants were cultured in growth chambers with a day:night cycle (16 h day at 25°C; 8 h night at 20°C) with a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 250 µmol m−2 s−1 (Sylvania 36 W Luxline-Plus). Nutrient composition of the substrate (Table S1) was determined by extraction of 10 g substrate in 20 ml 0.5 M NaHCO3 (pH = 8.5) for 30 min under shaking. For the determination of sodium content, 10 g of substrate was extracted with 20 ml distilled water. Nutrient levels in the resulting soil extracts were determined as described below.

Experimental design and nutrient treatments

Two experiments were carried out to assess the influence of nutrient supply on the level of AM colonization (Figures 1, 2). A third experiment was designed to assess the effect of nutrienpan>t supply anpan>d mycorrhizal colonpan>izationpan> onpan> planpan>t growth, nutrienpan>t conpan>tenpan>t, anpan>d genpan>e expressionpan> (Figures 3–6, Table 1). A fourth experimenpan>t was carried out to conpan>firm genpan>e expressionpan> results from microarray anpan>alysis by qPCR (Figure 7,8). And a finpan>al experimenpan>t tested the efpan> class="Chemical">fect of nutrient starvation on mycorrhizal colonization (Figure 9). All experiments were carried out with the experimental system described above. After the onset of the experiments, the plants were treated once per week for five weeks with the indicated solutions (experiments 1,2,4,5). Hence, each of these plants received a total of 250 ml of the indicated solutions over the five weeks of the experiment. In experiment 3, the plants were grown in a time course for 12 d (2 treatments), 22 d (4 treatments), 29 d (5 treatments), 36 d (6 treatments), or 48 d (7 treatments), with each treatment involving 50 ml of the respective nutrient solution. In general, the watering resulted in minimal leaching from the soil, thus the plants received the entire amount of nutrients applied to the pot. If necessary, in particular at later time points when plants had grown larger, they were watered a second time per week with only tap water to avoid water stress. Composition of the basic nutrient solution, of the modified solutions with elevated Pi concentration, and of the solutions lacking individual nutrients, is listed in Table S2. In the latter case, the omitted nutrients were replaced by other nutrient salts to maintain similar osmotic conditions. The effect of increasing concentrations of individual nutrients was tested with the indicated concentrations of MgSO4, FeIII-EDTA, Ca(NO3)2, and KH2PO4, respectively, in combination with basic nutrient solution.

Figure 1

Exogenous phosphate and nitrate inhibit root colonization by Rhizophagus irregularis.

Plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis were watered with the basic nutrient solution, additionally supplemented with the indicated nutrient concentrations. The first column to the left in each graph corresponds to the concentration in the basic nutrient solution, except for KH2PO4 (see Table S2); the other columns represent elevated nutrient levels as indicated. Columns represent the average of four replicate plants with standard deviations.

Figure 2

Inhibition of AM colonization by exogenous phosphate depends on the supply with other nutrients.

KH2PO4 was applied to inoculated plants at the indicated concentrations either with basic nutrient solution (black columns) or alone (white columns). Additional treatments involved the application of KH2PO4 with only micronutrients (light grey) or only macronutrients (dark grey), respectively. Columns represent the average of four replicate plants with standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant differences between phosphate alone (white bars) and phosphate with micronutrients (light grey bars), respectively, vs. the treatment with a combination of Pi and basic nutrient solution (black bars).

Figure 3

Dynamics of fungal root colonization and plant growth under different nutritional conditions.

Plants inoculated or not with R. irregularis were supplied with water (blue), basic nutrient solution (red), 5 mM KH2PO4 (green), or with a combination of 5 mM KH2PO4 and basic nutrient solution (purple). Samples were harvested at the indicated time points to determine root colonization (a), shoot fresh weight (b,c), and mycorrhizal growth response (MGR; (d)). MGR is defined as the ratio of the shoot weight of mycorrhizal versus non-mycorrhizal control plants. Values are the mean of three biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations.

Figure 6

Shoot weight, shoot/root ratio and N/P ratio as indicators of nutritional status.

Treatments were as in Figure 3, shown are the values of the final time point (48 days after inoculation). Columns represent the average of three biological replicates, error bars represent standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant differences between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants (white vs. black columns), crosses indicate significant differences between the non-mycorrhizal nutrient treatments vs. the non-mycorrhizal water treatment (i.e. between the different white columns). (a) Shoot weight of plants grown with R. irregularis (black column) or without (white columns) under different nutritional conditions. (b) Shoot/root ratio of plants inoculated with R. irregularis (black columns) or without (white columns) under various nutritional conditions. A ratio of 3.5–4 indicates that plants are well supplied with mineral nutrients, whereas a ratio around 2 indicates that plants are starved and allocate relatively large amounts of resources to the root system to compensate nutritional deficits. (c) N/P ratio of the same plants as in (a),(b). In the absence of exogenous Pi supply, mycorrhizal plants (black columns) exhibited lower N/P ratios than non-mycorrhizal controls, reflecting increased mycorrhizal Pi supply. Administration of 5 mM KH2PO4 reduced N/P ratio even stronger than AM, in particular if only Pi was supplied.

Table 1

Microarray analysis of N-related transporter genes in relation to the nutritional status.

		Fertilized plants			Non fertilized plants (Starved)
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7
		AM	AM+Pi	Pi	water	AM	AM+Pi	Pi
N/P ratio (relative to fertilized control)		0.541	0.212	0.266	0.653	0.234	0.126	0.127
Cn8666 (PhNRT2)	high-affinity nitrate transporter	1.44	18.08	21.27	18.2	11.2	16.33	37.53
CL1918 (PhNitr1)	putative nitrite transporter	7.63	13.64	10.59	6.15	26.57	27.23	23.75
cn5943 (PhNitr1)	putative nitrite transporter	6.42	19.23	15.71	6.23	41.61	41.41	17.95
cn8665	high affinity nitrate transporter	1.07	10.26	11.86	2.87	5.13	6.23	6.97
cn5272 (PhNRT1)	nitrate transporter	0.61	2.86	3.35	3.63	5.28	7.32	5.73
CL5245	nitrogen limitation adaptation	3.95	2.69	4.05	2.51	2.98	2.58	4.58
SG_SGN-U210769	nitrate transporter	1.21	1.73	1.12	1.83	4.71	10.41	3.72
cn7864	high-affinity nitrate transporter	1.32	3.01	2.96	2.83	2.69	2.85	3.51

Microarray analysis was carried out with root RNA from the plants shown in Figures 3–6 in the presence or absence of R. irregularis 36 d after inoculation. N/P ratio and gene expression ratios are expressed relative to reference plants supplemented with basic nutrient solution (fertilized). Relative gene induction is shown for the indicated treatments including inoculation with R. irregularis (AM), treatment with basic nutrient solution (fertilized plants) or water (non-fertilized plants), and treatment with 5 mM KH2PO4 (Pi). The list represents nitrogen-related genes among the top ten in Table S4. Values represent induction ratios between expression values from the indicated treatments divided by the expression value from the reference treatment (only nutrient solution). The individual expression values and the corresponding variation coefficients are listed in Table S3.

Figure 7

Phylogenetic analysis of Pi-responsive transporters of Petunia hybrida compared to Arabidopsis transporters for nitrate, nitrite, and peptides.

For the EST sequences listed in Table 1 the full-length predicted cDNA sequences were derived from the petunia genome sequence. Predicted petunia protein sequences were compared with Arabidopsis thaliana transporters for nitrate and nitrite (NRT and Nitr1, respectively), and for peptide transporters (PTR). Note the clear separation of the nitrate transporter subfamilies NRT1 and NRT2. The NRT1 family also comprises the nitrite transporter AtNitr1 and several peptide transporters, of which only two are represented (AtPTR2 and AtPTR5). Petunia has two very closely homologous representatives of the high affinity nitrate transporter family NRT2 (cn8666 and cn7864). In addition, there is a putative nitrite transporter (corresponding to the EST sequences CL1918 and cn5943), and two additional members of the low affinity NRT1 family. Genes boxed in green were analyzed by qPCR (Figure 8). Cn8665, which is almost identical to cn8666, and CL5245, which is predicted to encode a nitrogen limitation adaptation gene (see Table 1), were omitted from phylogenetic analysis.

Figure 8

Quantitative real time PCR analysis (qPCR) of marker genes for nitrogen and phosphorus acquisition.

qPCR analysis was performed to determine the expression of the N transporters boxed in Figure 7, and of the AM-specific phosphate transporter PhPT4. Treatments were as in Figures 3–6 and Table 1. Expression values were first normalized to GAPDH and then expressed as induction ratios for the indicated treatments relative to the standard treatment (non-mycorrhizal fertilized plants), as in Table 1. Columns represent the mean of five biological replicates. Error bars represent the standard deviations derived from the two standard deviations of the compared treatments (see Materials and Methods). Numbers below the x-axis reflect the percentage of root colonization in the respective sample.

Figure 9

Withdrawal of individual nutrients interferes with the inhibitory effect of Pi.

Effects of withdrawal of individual nutrients from the basic nutrient solution applied together with 52PO4. Omitted nutrients were replaced by other nutrients to maintain osmotic relationships. The strong inhibitory effect of Pi (P) was reduced particularly by removal of nitrate (P-N), but also to a lesser extent by removal of S, K, Ca, and Fe. The control treatment (c) represents fertilization with low Pi levels (0.03 mM). Columns represent the average of six biological replicates, error bars represent the standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the treatments lacking individual nutrients and the treatment with basic nutrient solution and high Pi.

Plants inon class="Chemical">culated with pan> class="Species">Rhizophagus irregularis were watered with the basic nutrient solution, additionally supplemented with the indicated nutrient concentrations. The first column to the left in each graph corresponds to the concentration in the basic nutrient solution, except for KH2PO4 (see Table S2); the other columns represent elevated nutrient levels as indicated. Columns represent the average of four replicate plants with standard deviations.

KH2PO4 was applied to inpan>oculated plants at the indicated concentrations either with basic nutrient solution (black columns) or alone (white columns). Additional treatments involved the application of KH2PO4 with only micronutrients (light grey) or only macronutrients (dark grey), respectively. Columns represent the average of four replicate plants with standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant differences between phosphate alone (white bars) and phosphate with micronutrients (light grey bars), respectively, vs. the treatment with a combination of Pi and basic nutrient solution (black bars).

Plants inoculated or not with pan> class="Species">R. irregularis were supplied with water (blue), basic nutrient solution (red), 5 mM KH2PO4 (green), or with a combination of 5 mM KH2PO4 and basic nutrient solution (purple). Samples were harvested at the indicated time points to determine root colonization (a), shoot fresh weight (b,c), and mycorrhizal growth response (MGR; (d)). MGR is defined as the ratio of the shoot weight of mycorrhizal versus non-mycorrhizal control plants. Values are the mean of three biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations.

Nutrient levels in leaves were determined 36 days after inon class="Chemical">culationpan> inpan> the planpan>ts shownpan> inpan> Figure 3. Values are the meanpan> of three biological replicates. Error bars represenpan>t stanpan>dard deviationpan>s. Asterisks inpan>dicate significanpan>t differences between mycorrhizal roots (black columns) and non-mycorrhizal controls (white columns). (a) Plants were fertilized with basic nutrient solution. Values are expressed relative to the non-mycorrhizal fertilized controls that were set to 100% for each nutrient. (b) As in (a), but without nutrient solution. Values are expressed relative to the non-colonized water-treated controls that were set to 100% for each nutrient.

Nutrient levels in leaves were determined 36 days after inon class="Chemical">culationpan> inpan> the planpan>ts shownpan> inpan> Figure 3. Values are the meanpan> of three replicates. Error bars represenpan>t stanpan>dard deviationpan>s. Asterisks inpan>dicate significanpan>t differences between Pi and water treatment (a) or between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots (b). (a) Treatment of non-inoculated plants with 5 mM KH2PO4 alone (black columns) compared to controls with water alone (white columns). Values are expressed relative to the water-treated controls that were set to 100% for each nutrient. (b) Nutrient content of mycorrhizal plants treated with 5 mM KH2PO4 (black columns) compared to non-inoculated controls treated with 5 mM KH2PO4 (white columns; corresponding to black columns in (a)). Values are expressed relative to the non-colonized Pi-treated controls that were set to 100% for each nutrient.

Treatments were as in Figure 3, shown are the values of the final time point (48 days after inoculationpan>). Columnpan>s represenpan>t the average of three biological replicates, error bars represenpan>t stanpan>dard deviationpan>s. Asterisks inpan>dicate significanpan>t differences between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants (white vs. black columns), crosses indicate significant differences between the non-mycorrhizal nutrient treatments vs. the non-mycorrhizal water treatment (i.e. between the different white columns). (a) Shoot weight of plants grown with R. irregularis (black column) or without (white columns) under different nutritional conditions. (b) Shoot/root ratio of plants inoculated with R. irregularis (black columns) or without (white columns) under various nutritional conditions. A ratio of 3.5–4 indicates that plants are well supplied with mineral nutrients, whereas a ratio around 2 indicates that plants are starved and allocate relatively large amounts of resources to the root system to compensate nutritional deficits. (c) N/P ratio of the same plants as in (a),(b). In the absence of exogenous Pi supply, mycorrhizal plants (black columns) exhibited lower N/P ratios than non-mycorrhizal controls, reflecting increased mycorrhizal Pi supply. Administration of 5 mM KH2PO4 reduced N/P ratio even stronger than AM, in particular if only Pi was supplied.

For the EST sequences listed in Table 1 the full-length predicted cDNA sequences were derived from the petunia genpan>ome sequenpan>ce. Predicted pan> class="Species">petunia protein sequences were compared with Arabidopsis thaliana transporters for nitrate and nitrite (NRT and Nitr1, respectively), and for peptide transporters (PTR). Note the clear separation of the nitrate transporter subfamilies NRT1 and NRT2. The NRT1 family also comprises the nitrite transporter AtNitr1 and several peptide transporters, of which only two are represented (AtPTR2 and AtPTR5). Petunia has two very closely homologous representatives of the high affinity nitrate transporter family NRT2 (cn8666 and cn7864). In addition, there is a putative nitrite transporter (corresponding to the EST sequences CL1918 and cn5943), and two additional members of the low affinity NRT1 family. Genes boxed in green were analyzed by qPCR (Figure 8). Cn8665, which is almost identical to cn8666, and CL5245, which is predicted to encode a nitrogen limitation adaptation gene (see Table 1), were omitted from phylogenetic analysis.

qPCR analysis was performed to determine the expression of the N transporters boxed in Figure 7, and of the AM-specific n class="Chemical">phosphate tranpan>sporter Phpan> class="Chemical">PT4. Treatments were as in Figures 3–6 and Table 1. Expression values were first normalized to GAPDH and then expressed as induction ratios for the indicated treatments relative to the standard treatment (non-mycorrhizal fertilized plants), as in Table 1. Columns represent the mean of five biological replicates. Error bars represent the standard deviations derived from the two standard deviations of the compared treatments (see Materials and Methods). Numbers below the x-axis reflect the percentage of root colonization in the respective sample.

Efn class="Chemical">fects of withdrawal of inpan>dividual nutrienpan>ts from the basic nutrienpan>t solutionpan> applied together with pan> class="Chemical">52PO4. Omitted nutrients were replaced by other nutrients to maintain osmotic relationships. The strong inhibitory effect of Pi (P) was reduced particularly by removal of nitrate (P-N), but also to a lesser extent by removal of S, K, Ca, and Fe. The control treatment (c) represents fertilization with low Pi levels (0.03 mM). Columns represent the average of six biological replicates, error bars represent the standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the treatments lacking individual nutrients and the treatment with basic nutrient solution and high Pi.

Microarray analysis was carried out with root RNA from the plants shown in Figures 3–6 in the presence or absence of n class="Species">R. irregularis 36 d after inpan>oculation. N/P ratio and gene expression ratios are expressed relative to reference plants supplemented with basic nutrient solution (fertilized). Relative gene induction is shown for the indicated treatments including inoculation with R. irregularis (AM), treatment with basic nutrient solution (fertilized plants) or water (non-fertilized plants), and treatment with 5 mM KH2PO4 (Pi). The list represents nitrogen-related genes among the top ten in Table S4. Values represent induction ratios between expression values from the indicated treatments divided by the expression value from the reference treatment (only nutrient solution). The individual expression values and the corresponding variation coefficients are listed in Table S3.

Determination of plant weight and AM colonization

Plants were harvested at the indicated time points to determine the fresh weight of the shoot and the root. Subsequently, root samples were taken for determination of total intraradical root colonization and, in case of experiments 3 and 4, the remaining root system was frozen in liquid n class="Chemical">N2 for RNA extractionpan>. The shoots were dried (overnpan>ight at 120°C) for the determinpan>ationpan> of leaf nutrienpan>t conpan>tenpan>t. The shoot:root ratio was calculated by dividing the fresh weight of the shoot by the fresh weight of the root. The mycorrhizal growth response (MGR) was calculated as the ratio of the shoot fresh weights of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants, respectively. Data shown in Figures 3 to 6 and Table 1 come from the same experiment.

Root staining and quantification of mycorrhizal colonization were carried out as described [41]. Briefly, roots were harvested, washed and stored overnight in 10% n class="Chemical">KOH (w/v) inpan> glass tubes. Thenpan>, they were cleared for 30 minpan> at 95°C, washed twice with pan> class="Chemical">water, stained for 10 min with Trypan Blue (TB) staining solution at 95°C, and rinsed twice with 30% lactic acid (v/v). TB staining solution consisted of 20% glycerol (w/v), 30% lactic acid (v/v) and 0.01% Trypan Blue (w/v). Microscopic inspection and quantification of root colonization was carried out as described with a modified grid intersection method [41].

In general, the columns represent the mean of the values from the indicated number of biological replicates (see figure legends). Error bars represent the standard deviations. Tests for significance of difn class="Chemical">ferenpan>ces betweenpan> treatmenpan>ts were carried out by pairwise t-test. Significanpan>ce is classified as follows: * 0.05>p>0.01, ** 0.01>p>0.001, *** p>0.001.

Determination of metal mineral nutrients

For the quantification of K, Ca, n class="Chemical">Mg, pan> class="Chemical">Cu, Mn, Fe, Zn and Ni by atomic absorption spectrometry, dry leaves from time point 36 d in experiment 3 were weighed, dry ashed at 550°C for 8 h and then further processed as described [42]. Briefly, the residue was dissolved in 0.2 ml 10 M HCI and 7.8 ml water. The solutions were then mixed and diluted with 1.267 g L−1 CsCl suprapur in 0.1 M HCI (for potassium), with 13.37 g L−1 LaCl3-7H2O in 0.1 M HCI (for calcium and magnesium) and with 0.1 N HCI (for iron, manganese, copper, zinc, and nickel) prior to measuring the elements by atomic absorption spectrometry.

Determination of reduced nitrogen in leaves

Determination of total reduced nitrogen followed a simplified versionpan> of the micro-Kjeldahl procedure reported by [43]. Leaf material (30 pan> class="Chemical">mg dry matter) was homogenized in 1 ml 0.01 M KOH and 200 µl of this homogenate was transferred to micro-Kjeldahl tubes, mixed with 100 µl combustion acid (4.2 M H2SO4 containing 5.4 g/l HgCl2) and incubated in a sand bath first at 160°C for 40 min and then for 2 h at 300°C. The samples were allowed to cool to room temperature, then 50 µl H2O2 (30%) were added, followed by further incubation at 160°C during 1 h and at 300°C for 2 h. After a second addition of 50 µl H2O2 (30%) and further incubation at 160°C for 15 min, 1 ml water was added followed by colorimetric determination of the reduced nitrogen (ammonium) by mixing 50 µl of this sample solution with 100 µl 2.5% K-Na-tartrate (w/v) and 100 µl dilute Nessler reagent (1 part of Nessler Reagent Merck Nr 109028 and two parts 2.5 M NaOH). Absorbance was measured at 450 nm.

Determination of leaf phosphorus content

Dry leaf material (20 mg) was ashed overnight at 550°C in heat-resistanpan>t glass tubes. The residue was dissolved in 2 ml pan> class="Chemical">H2O and 100 µl HCl (32%). 1 ml solution was then transferred to Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged in a table centrifuge (12′000 rpm for 10 min). From the supernatant, 150 µl were transferred to microtiter plates, mixed with 40 µl phosphate reagent, and absorbance was measured at 405 nm. Phosphate reagent (100 ml) was prepared by mixing 20 ml ammonium heptamolybdate (5% w/v (NH4)6Mo7O24 in water), 20 ml ammonium metavanadate (2.5% w/v NH4VO3 in water), 13.8 ml concentrated nitric acid, and 46.2 ml water.

Microarray analysis

Microarray analysis was performed as described [34]. Briefly, total root RNA from plants harvested at time point 36 d after inoculationpan> (experimenpan>t 3) was extracted with the hot pan> class="Chemical">phenol procedure [44], pooled per treatment (equal amounts; n = 3), and sent to Nimblegen on dry ice. Array design of a four-plex microarray with 72′000 features was carried out using the Array-Scribe software from NimbleGen (http://www.nimblegen.com) to generate three optimized independent probes per gene, with an average length of 36 base pairs per probe. For shorter sequences, two probes per sequence were designed. Array design, probe synthesis, synthesis of labeled cDNA, hybridization, and data acquisition was carried out by Nimblegen as described [45]. Average expression values and a coefficient of variation for the gene expression values (Table S3) were derived by across-array quantile normalization using the Robust Multichip Average (RMA) algorithm [46]. Comparative analysis of expression data sets was carried out with Fire2.2 [47]. Table S3 compiles the entire data set resulting from microarray analysis. Gene expression ratios in Table 1 and Tables S4 and S5 represent the ratios of the expression values of the respective treatment divided by the expression values of the standard treatment (fertilized plants at low Pi levels).

Quantitative real time RT-PCR (qPCR)

For the independent assessment of gene expression by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction coupled to reverse transcription (qPCR), a new experiment was carried out under identical conditions as the one represented in Table 1 and Tables S4 and S5, but in this case with five biological replicates per treatment. Total RNA was extracted using the hot phenol procedure [44]. First-stranpan>d cDNA synpan>thesis was performed with the Omnpan>iscript RT kit accordinpan>g to the manpan>ufacturer's guidelinpan>es. qRT-PCR was carried out with the ABsolute qPCR SYBR Greenpan> mastermix (Thermo Scienpan>tific, http://www.thermo.com) inpan> a Rotorgenpan>e thermocycler (Corbett Lipan> class="Chemical">fe Science, http://www.corbettlifescience.com) with the primers listed in Table S6. The PCR conditions included an initial denaturation cycle for 15 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 15 s at 95°C, annealing for 20 s at 60°C and extension for 20 s at 72°C, followed by a final extension for 5 min at 72°C. Primer design was performed with the online primer design tool primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/) on the entire predicted cDNA sequence derived from the genomic sequence, which had been identified using the EST sequences. For this reason, the qPCR results (Figure 8) relate to gene names (as in the case of the phylogenetic analysis on the predicted proteins; Figure 7), and not to the array IDs. (as in Tables S4 and S5). Table 1 and Figure 7 show which array ID corresponds to which gene name.

Each treatment is represented by five biological replicate plants that were analyzed with two technical replicates each. First, the relative expression value for each gene was obtained with the delta-delta-CT method [48] using GAPDH as constitutive ren class="Chemical">ferenpan>ce genpan>e for normalizationpan>. Thenpan> the relative expressionpan> ratios per treatmenpan>t were derived by averaginpan>g the five biological replicates +/− stanpan>dard deviationpan>s. Subsequenpan>tly, inpan>ductionpan> ratios were calculated between the indicated treatments relative to the reference treatment (non-mycorrhizal plants with fertilizer; see Figure 8). T-test was performed for each treatment relative to the reference treatment. Standard deviations in Figure 8 were derived using the law of propagation of the error, based on the standard deviations resulting from the five biological replicates according to the following formula (for a pair of treatments a,b): StDev = SQRT((StDeva/Avea)2+ (StDevb/Aveb)2)*(Aveb/Avea). Significance is classified as follows: * 0.05>p>0.01, ** 0.01>p>0.001, *** p>0.001.

Phylogenetic sequence analysis

Predicted protein sequences were either retrieved from the public databases (n class="Species">Arabidopsis thaliana), or derived from genpan>omic pan> class="Species">petunia sequences with the prediction tool Augustus (http://bioinf.uni-greifswald.de/augustus). The predicted amino acid sequences listed in File S1 were used for phylogenetic analysis (http://www.phylogeny.fr/version2).

Results

Phosphate and nitrate influence AM colonization

In order to test whether AM development is sensitive to other nutrients than n class="Chemical">phosphate (Pi), the macronpan>utrienpan>ts pan> class="Chemical">nitrate, sulfate, calcium, magnesium, and the micronutrient iron were applied to petunia plants inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis at elevated levels in the form of MgSO4, Ca(NO3)2, and FeIIIEDTA, respectively (Figure 1). The latter was used only at sub-millimolar concentrations because of its potential toxicity [49]. Apart from Pi (Figure 1a), the only nutrient salt that significantly affected AM development was Ca(NO3)2 which caused a modest reduction of colonization from approximately 80% to 50% when applied at a concentration of 19 mM, whereas at 5 mM, a small enhancement of AM colonization was observed (Figure 1b). A control experiment with CaCl2 had no effect on AM (data not shown), suggesting that the effect of Ca(NO3)2 is caused by the nitrate anion rather than by the calcium cation. FeIIIEDTA did not affect AM colonization (Figure 1c), and likewise, MgSO4 as a control for osmotic effects did not interfere with AM colonization (Figure 1d; compare also with [34]).

Suppression of AM colonization by Pi depends on supply with other nutrients

To test whether the inhibition of AM development by high Pi depends on the nutritional context, inoculated planpan>ts were supplied with 5 mM pan> class="Chemical">KH2PO4 either alone or in combination with basic nutrient solution. In two additional treatments, Pi was supplied together with only micro- or macronutrients, respectively. While Pi caused a marked decrease of AM colonization in the presence of basic nutrient solution, or with only the macronutrients, inhibition reached only about 40% relative to fertilized plants (from ca. 65% colonization to ca. 25% colonization), when Pi was applied alone or with only micronutrients (Figure 2). Hence, the starvation for some macronutrient(s) generates an AM-promoting signal that counteracts the inhibitory effect of high Pi.

Dynamics of plant growth and root colonization in dependence of nutrient supply

To address the dynamics of AM colonization and plant growth in dependence of nutrient supply, a time course experiment was performed with plants treated with 5 mM KH2PO4 anpan>d nutrienpan>t solutionpan> inpan> different combinations and in the presence and absence of R. irregularis. Shoot and root weight, as well as AM colonization, were determined 12, 22, 29, 36, and 48 days after inoculation. AM colonization increased most rapidly in plants treated with nutrient solution, reaching over 40% already after 22 d, whereas treatment with water resulted in generally lower colonization levels (Figure 3a). The treatment with 5 mM KH2PO4 in combination with nutrient solution strongly inhibited AM colonization, however, the inhibition was only partial in treatments with Pi alone.

Pi in combination with nutrient solution caused strong growth promotion, whereas Pi alone did only moderately stimulate growth (Figure 3b,c). This was the case irrespective of the presence of n class="Species">R. irregularis, inpan>dicatinpan>g that unpan>der these conpan>ditionpan>s, funpan>gal colonpan>izationpan> did not provide a significanpan>t benpan>efit. These results conpan>firm that starvationpan> for other nutrienpan>ts reduces the inpan>hibitory efpan> class="Chemical">fect of Pi on AM fungal colonization (compare with Figure 2). Interestingly, a positive mycorrhizal growth response (MGR) was observed only in the presence of nutrient solution (Figure 3b-d), showing firstly that the plants could not profit from nutrient supply without the fungus, and secondly, that fungal efficiency has its limits, since plants that were not supplied with nutrient solution (and therefore relied entirely on the low nutrient concentrations in the substrate) did not show a significant MGR despite considerable colonization levels (Figure 3a,d).

R. irregularis improves plant nutrition in petunia

The marked differenpan>ces inpan> AM colonpan>izationpan> anpan>d pan> class="Chemical">MGR between the nutritional treatments (Figure 3) prompted us to evaluate the nutrient status of these plants as an indicator for plant fitness and qualitative mycorrhizal benefits (Figure S1). For easier comparison, the nutrient levels of the different treatments were normalized to the respective controls that were set at 100% (Figures 4, 5). First, the effect of AM on the levels of various metal ions, phosphate and nitrate in fertilized and non-fertilized plants were determined. Fertilized plants showed an AM-related increase in several mineral nutrient levels, however, only manganese and phosphate reached the significance threshold. In contrast, potassium levels were reduced in mycorrhizal roots relative to the non-mycorrhizal controls (Figure 4a). Hence, in addition to the quantitative benefit in growth (Figure 3), mycorrhizal plants profited from a qualitative improvement in mineral nutrition (in particular of phosphorus and manganese).

Figure 4

R. irregularis increases nutrient content of plants supplied with water or with nutrient solution.

Nutrient levels in leaves were determined 36 days after inoculation in the plants shown in Figure 3. Values are the mean of three biological replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant differences between mycorrhizal roots (black columns) and non-mycorrhizal controls (white columns). (a) Plants were fertilized with basic nutrient solution. Values are expressed relative to the non-mycorrhizal fertilized controls that were set to 100% for each nutrient. (b) As in (a), but without nutrient solution. Values are expressed relative to the non-colonized water-treated controls that were set to 100% for each nutrient.

Figure 5

Treatment with KH2PO4 alone causes depletion of other nutrients and interferes with nutrient acquisition in mycorrhizal roots.

Nutrient levels in leaves were determined 36 days after inoculation in the plants shown in Figure 3. Values are the mean of three replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant differences between Pi and water treatment (a) or between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots (b). (a) Treatment of non-inoculated plants with 5 mM KH2PO4 alone (black columns) compared to controls with water alone (white columns). Values are expressed relative to the water-treated controls that were set to 100% for each nutrient. (b) Nutrient content of mycorrhizal plants treated with 5 mM KH2PO4 (black columns) compared to non-inoculated controls treated with 5 mM KH2PO4 (white columns; corresponding to black columns in (a)). Values are expressed relative to the non-colonized Pi-treated controls that were set to 100% for each nutrient.

Similarly, plants treated only with n class="Chemical">water exhibited inpan>creased levels of pan> class="Chemical">calcium, zinc, and phosphorus, (Figure 4b). These results show that mycorrhizal plants profit, in addition to the mycorrhizal growth effect, from a qualitative benefit in mineral nutrition. This qualitative benefit was also observed in the absence of a positive growth response as observed in the water-treated plants.

Exogenous Pi supply interferes with plant nutrition

To determine how Pi supply in the absence of other nutrients impacts on general plant nutrition, the nutrient levels in plants treated only with Pi were determined relative to plants treated with n class="Chemical">water (Figure 5a; Figure S1). As expected, supply with Pi alonpan>e resulted inpan> a stronpan>g inpan>crease of P inpan> the shoot, however, the levels of other nutrienpan>ts, inpan> particular Mg, Cu, Zn and nitrate, were reduced. This may reflect the dilution of these nutrients in the leaves as a result of the moderately stimulated growth in response to elevated Pi.

Examination of the effect of pan> class="Species">R. irregularis on mineral nutrition in plants treated with Pi alone (without fertilization) revealed a surprising trend. The levels of several nutrients were further reduced in these mycorrhizal plants relative to the respective non-mycorrhizal controls treated with only Pi (Figure 5b, compare with 4a,b). This indicates that the AM fungus did not provide a nutritional benefit, but rather acted like a parasite by consuming carbohydrates, and at the same time holding back mineral nutrients. In addition, the DP for phosphate, represented by PhPT1 and PhPT2, was repressed under these conditions (Tables S4, S5).

Shoot/root ratio and N/P ratio indicate that elevated Pi levels cause N-starvation

Several lines of evidence indicated that Pi-treated plants were starved for other nutrients, in particular N (see above). Therefore, three parameters that are inpan>dicative of nutritionpan>al status inpan> planpan>ts were compared, namely shoot weight, shoot/root (S/R) ratio, anpan>d N/P ratio. Shoot growth was significanpan>tly inpan>duced by AM inpan> fertilized plants, and by high Pi in combination with nutrient solution, indicating that these plants experienced favorable nutrient supply (Figure 6a). The S/R ratios (Figure 6b) showed a similar trend, in particular, the supply with high Pi in combination with nutrient solution caused the S/R ratio to double compared to water and Pi alone. Similarly, the strong growth effect of mycorrhizal plants with nutrient solution (Figure 3d) translated into a pronounced increase of S/R ratio (Figure 6b). In contrast, the treatments of water or Pi alone resulted in low S/R ratio even in mycorrhizal plants, indicating that these plants were nutrient-limited despite their mycorrhizal status.

Finally, the relative levels of N and P (N/P ratio) in leaves were determined in the difn class="Chemical">ferenpan>t treatmenpan>ts. Normally, the N/P ratio is inpan> the ranpan>ge of 10–20 [50]. Planpan>ts treated onpan>ly with pan> class="Chemical">water had a relatively high N/P ratio of ca. 30, and the supply with nutrient solution caused the ratio to increase to ca. 55 (Figure 6c), reflecting the effect of N supply via fertilization. Under both Pi-depleted nutrient regimes, mycorrhizal colonization dramatically reduced the N/P ratio reflecting the increased Pi supply through AM (Figure 6c). In this context, it is interesting to note that the improved P status in mycorrhizal plants supplied with only water did not translate into an MGR (Figure 3d), indicating that these plants were starved for nutrients other than Pi. As expected, the treatments with high Pi dramatically reduced the N/P ratio in particular if Pi was applied alone (Figure 6c).

Taken together, these results indicate that only n class="Chemical">fertilized mycorrhizal planpan>ts anpan>d pan> class="Chemical">fertilized Pi-treated plants were well supplied with nutrients, whereas the other plants were limited for some nutrients other than Pi, conceivably N. In other words, exogenous Pi caused relative N-starvation. Furthermore, the N/P ratios of mycorrhizal plants suggest that AM promote P nutrition more than N nutrition.

Microarray analysis of the Pi effect indicates N-starvation

In order to obtain further insight into the nutritional status of the plants, microarray analysis was employed to assess the expression of genes involved in nutrient acquisition, which can serve as a diagnostic tool. In order to reveal the consequences of elevated Pi levels for plant physiology, the genes that responded to a treatment with Pi alone (in the absence of additional fertilizer) were first idenpan>tified. Amonpan>g a total of 660 genpan>es that were inpan>duced at least 3-fold by Pi, the first tenpan> conpan>tainpan>ed three genpan>es enpan>codinpan>g predicted pan> class="Chemical">nitrate and nitrite transporters (data not shown). Focusing on only genes involved in mineral nutrient uptake revealed 28 genes induced 2-fold and 38 genes repressed 2-fold by Pi (Table S4). Interestingly, among the genes involved in nutrient acquisition, the ten IDs with the highest induction ratio comprised eight genes with a predicted role in nitrogen acquisition (Table 1, Table S4). Functional grouping of all Pi-regulated genes involved in nutrient acquisition confirmed that N-related genes were induced to the highest levels, followed by sulfur-related genes, whereas all PTs were repressed (Table S5). Interestingly, no ammonium transporter responded to high Pi.

The N-related genes comprised nitrate tranpan>sporters (NRTs) of both knpan>ownpan> subfamilies (NRT1 anpan>d pan> class="Gene">NRT2) and a predicted nitrite transporter (Nitr1) (File S1; Figure 7). These genes were induced by Pi, irrespective of the presence of additional nutrients, and of the presence of the mycorrhizal fungus (Table 1, treatments 2, 3, 6, and 7), indicating that plants may experience relative N-limitation under all these conditions. In addition, they were induced in non-fertilized starved plants and, partially, in starved mycorrhizal roots (Table 1, treatments 4 and 5). This expression pattern is inversely correlated with the N/P ratio in the shoot (Table 1, first line; normalized to fertilized controls).

Quantitative real time RT-PCR (qPCR) analysis confirms results from microarray analysis

In order to independently evaluate the expression of the marker genes for N acquisition, a new experiment under equivalent conditions was performed and the expression of genes, identified by microarray analysis, was determined by quantitative real time RT-PCR (qPCR). Representative genes for the two NRT subfamilies and for the putative Nitr1 were selected (Figure 7), and their expression compared with the expression of the functional AM marker PT4 (Figure 8). Inpan> genpan>eral, the expressionpan> of the N-related genpan>es showed a similar trenpan>d as with microarray anpan>alysis. They were stronpan>gly inpan>duced inpan> all treatmenpan>ts with pan> class="Chemical">KH2PO4 (Figures 8a–c), and, to a lesser extent, in non-fertilized plants both, in mycorrhizal roots as well as non-mycorrhizal controls. PT4 was strongly induced in mycorrhizal plants supplied with low Pi levels, but only weakly in inoculated plants treated with KH2PO4 (Figure 8d). Notably, the partially restored colonization in plants treated with Pi alone (28.2% colonization) was not associated with a proportional restoration of PT4 induction (Figure 8d). This indicates that the MP for Pi remained inactive, hence, the level of AM colonization and the expression of PT4 are uncoupled under these conditions.

Suppression of AM colonization by Pi depends on adequate nitrogen supply

So far, our results indicate that P caused relative N-starvation, in partin class="Chemical">cular if it was applied alonpan>e (without further nutrienpan>ts). Henpan>ce, it may have beenpan> the starvationpan> for N that counpan>teracted the inpan>hibitory efpan> class="Chemical">fect of high Pi and caused the recovery of root colonization. To test this possibility, several nutrients were removed individually by treating inoculated plants with high Pi together with basic nutrient solution from which individual nutrients were omitted (Figure 9; Table S2). While the treatment with all nutrients reduced AM colonization to 3%, the removal of nitrate from the nutrient solution resulted in a recovery to over 30% colonization, as in the case where all nutrients had been removed (compare with Figures 2,3). The individual removal of several other nutrient elements (S, K, Ca, Fe) also caused a partial recovery of AM colonization, although to a lesser extent.

Discussion

Genetic and nutritional control of AM symbiosis

During the past decade, genetic analysis of AM has revealed a suite of genes of the plant host that are essential for the establishment of the interaction and which are therefore referred to as symbiosis (SYM) genpan>es [51]. They conpan>stitute a signalinpan>g pathway that triggers a characteristic pan> class="Chemical">calcium signal (calcium spiking) that is required for intracellular accommodation of the endosymbiont and for reprogramming of the host cells [51]–[53]. Apart from these endogenous factors, environmental factors influence AM in various ways. In particular, mineral nutrients are known to influence symbiosis. In general, low nutrient levels promote symbiosis, whereas high nutrient levels are inhibitory [3]. Since the primordial benefit of AM is the acquisition of mineral nutrients, the regulatory function of nutrients may represent a feedback mechanism to coordinate AM colonization with the nutritional requirements of the plant.

Regulation of AM by phosphate

Pi is thought to be the major n class="Chemical">currenpan>cy with which the obligate symbiotic AM funpan>gi pay for assimilates of the planpan>t [54], [55]. Accordinpan>gly, planpan>ts have lonpan>g beenpan> knpan>ownpan> to responpan>d particularly sensitive to high Pi levels with suppression of the symbiosis [30]–[38]. Inhibition of AM development by Pi is systemic and appears to depend on the P-status of the shoot [33], [34]. Although an active role of the plant in the Pi-related repression of AM is plausible, the mechanisms involved are elusive.

Transcriptomic analysis of the high Pi response showed that besides the repression of the Pi-starvation pathway, Pi repressed n class="Chemical">carotenoid biosynpan>thetic genpan>es anpan>d symbiosis-related genpan>es such as pan> class="Chemical">PT4 [34]. Although production and secretion of the AM-promoting apocarotenoid strigolactone (SL) from the plant host is known to be inversely correlated with Pi supply [33], [56]–[58], reduced SL secretion alone cannot explain the inhibitory action of Pi, since SL application does not alleviate the inhibition by Pi [34]. A conceivable mechanism for P-related regulation of AM is the control of fungal growth through reduced supply of assimilates to the fungus [59].

Regulation of AM by other nutrients

For optimal growth and functioning, plants rely on balanced nutrient supply, which implies some sort of coordination between the acquisition pathways for the differenpan>t nutrienpan>ts. Inpan> particular, the pathways for the nutrient elements required at highest amounts, namely N and P, are known to interact [50]. The present study describes a systematic analysis of the nutritional effects of Pi and other nutrients on AM, and the interactions of Pi with other nutrients. A first outcome is the finding that among all the tested nutrients, only Pi and nitrate exerted a negative influence on AM, whereas other major nutrients such as potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sulfate (SO4), and iron (Fe) did not influence AM at elevated concentrations (Figure 1; compare also with [34]). The relatively weak inhibitory effect of nitrate suggests that this effect may not be of central importance for the regulation of AM in the case of petunia, although a significant decline of AM colonization has been associated with high nitrogen supply in other systems [60], [61].

Cross-talk of P with N and other nutritional pathways

Exogenous Pi supply in the absence of other nutrients resulted in a low S/R ratio (Figure 6b), indicative of starvation for a nutritional factor that causes the plant to prioritize root growth to compensate low nutrient supply [62]. Indeed, Pi supply resulted in strongly lowered N/P ratios (Figure 6c), i.e. in relative N-starvation. Nutrient starvation often leads to the induction of nutrient transporters to compensate for low nutrient supply [63]. For example, Pi-starvation induces Pi-transporters (PT) in n class="Species">Arabidopsis anpan>d pan> class="Species">tomato [64], [65], whereas N-starvation induces various nitrate transporters (NRT) in rice and Arabidopsis [66], [67].

Indeed, high Pi caused a strong induction of genes with a predicted role in N acquisition (Table 1; Tables S4 and S5), while transporters for other nutrients were affected to a lesser extenpan>t (Table S5). Inpan>terestinpan>gly, the Pi-related inpan>ductionpan> of genpan>es inpan>volved inpan> N acquisitionpan> was also observed inpan> mycorrhizal planpan>ts, inpan> particular in the non-fertilized ones (Table 1, treatment 5; Figure 8), consistent with the decrease of the N/P ratio in these plants (Figure 6c). Among the induced NRTs (Table S5; Figure 7), three very similar genes encoded predicted high-affinity transporters within the NRT2 family (cn8665, cn8666 and cn7864), with cn8665 and cn8666 being 100% identical at the amino acid level. Hence, only cn8666 was analyzed phylogenetically as a representative of this group (Figure 7). Cn8666 and cn7864 are particularly closely related to AtNRT2.1, which is essential for the response to nitrate starvation in the roots of Arabidopsis [68], and to AtNRT2.4, which is induced by N-starvation in the root epidermis and contributes to nitrate acquisition under this condition [67]. Three further genes, represented by the EST sequences cn5272, cn5943, CL1918, and SG_SGN-U210769, fall into the NRT1 family (Figure 7). Besides low-affinity nitrate transporters, the NRT1 family of Arabidospsis contains a predicted plastidial nitrite transporter (AtNitr1) [69], and a so-called nitrate transceptor [70], [71], which is involved in both, the transport and the perception and signaling of nitrate [72]. The petunia EST consensus sequences cn5943 and CL1918 belong to the same petunia gene, which is most closely related to the Arabidopsis Nitr1 [69]. While several genes involved in N acquisition were induced by N starvation, two predicted nitrate transporters (cn8317 and cn8506) behaved in the opposite way, i.e. they were repressed by N starvation (Table S4 and S5). These genes may encode nitrate transporters that are induced by their own substrate, nitrate [73], [74]. Taken together, these results indicate that Pi induces the entire nitrate acquisition pathway, and possibly nitrate sensing in petunia.

Besides the induction of nitrate tranpan>sporters that are inpan>volved inpan> the pan> class="Chemical">DP for N uptake, N starvation caused AM colonization to be partially restored under high Pi levels (Figures 3, 6, 9), conceivably to enable symbiotic N uptake despite the inhibitory levels of Pi. Interestingly, it has been observed in a natural environment as well that the repression of AM colonization by high Pi was relieved when N became limiting [40]. A similar interaction between P and N nutrition was shown on colonization of Allium schoenoprasum by Glomus caledonium in pot cultures [75]. These results are in line with the hypothesis that AM symbiosis evolved to ensure balanced nutrient levels in both partners and a stoichiometric relationship in the exchange of C, N, and P [76].

If AM colonization at high Pi levels was promoted to enable symbiotic N acquisition, ammonium transporters (AMT) of the plant would be expected to become induced to allow N from the fungus to be taken up in the form of ammonium [16]. However, no AMT was induced by high Pi, indicating that despite the restoration of root colonization, the symbiosis does not contribute to N uptake under these conditions, an assumption that is in line with the reduced N levels in these plants (Figure 5b). Surprisingly, the recovery of AM colonization observed in plants supplied with high Pi alone was not associated with a parallel induction of symbiotic PT expression (Figure 8d), although the colonization appeared morphologically normal. PT4 is commonpan>ly regarded as a marker for functionpan>al symbiotic cells with arbuscules, however, repression of PT4 by Pi appears to be stronger than induction of PT4 by the AM fungus. Taken together, these findings suggest that AM colonization under these conditions does not confer an obvious nutritional benefit to the plant host.

Inhibition of AM development by high Pi and by mutation of Pi transporters: common mechanisms?

Interestingly, mutation of AM-related PTs in the plant causes a similar inhibitory efn class="Chemical">fect onpan> AM as high exogenpan>ous Pi supply [77]–[79]. However, inpan> these cases, it is not the abunpan>danpan>t supply, but the lack of Pi delivery that triggers inpan>hibitionpan>. A possible explanpan>ationpan> for this observationpan> is that the planpan>t canpan> assess the costs (assimilate conpan>sumptionpan> of the funpan>gus), anpan>d the benpan>efits (funpan>gal Pi supply) inpan> the inpan>teractionpan>, anpan>d inpan>hibits funpan>gal colonpan>izationpan> if the balanpan>ce is unpan>favorable. The fact that Pi stronpan>gly represses symbiotic PTs (Table S5) anpan>d other symbiosis-related genpan>es [34] raises the possibility that the high Pi efpan> class="Chemical">fect and the PT mutant phenotype may involve partially overlapping mechanisms: Although the two conditions have opposite consequences for the P status of the plant, they both result in inhibition of the symbiotic Pi uptake pathway.

Inhibition of AM development by PT mutation has been observed in legumes and rice [77]–[79]. Mutationpan> of a close homologue inpan> pan> class="Species">tomato had no AM-related phenotype [80], [81], conceivably because of functional redundancy among the three symbiotic PT genes commonly found in Solanaceae [81]–[83]. In P. hybrida, all three PTs were strongly repressed by Pi, thus resulting in a general conditional inactivation of the symbiotic Pi uptake pathway [34], potentially contributing to inhibition of AM development as in PT mutants of legumes and rice. An interesting parallel concerning the inhibitory effects of high Pi and of PT mutation on AM development extends to the fact that both conditions can be reversed by N-starvation (Figure 9; Javot et al., 2011).

Mycorrhizal benefits depend on nutrient supply

The primary benefit of AM is thought to be the improved supply of macro- and micronutrients [21], [84], in partin class="Chemical">cular of Pi, which tranpan>slates into increased growth rates of mycorrhizal plants, the so-called mycorrhizal growth response (MGR). Indeed, a robust MGR and enhanced nutrient levels in mycorrhizal plants were observed upon fertilization with basic nutrient solution (Figures 3d, 4a; Figure S1). Taking into account both the MGR and the increased nutrient content per gram of leaf tissue, mycorrhizal plants contained approximately 6-fold the amount of Pi compared to fertilized plants without AM, and approximately 4-fold the amount of the other nutrients.

Unn class="Chemical">fertilized mycorrhizal planpan>ts also had inpan>creased nutrienpan>t levels compared to nonpan>-mycorrhizal conpan>trol planpan>ts, although to a lesser extenpan>t, anpan>d onpan>ly Pi acpan> class="Chemical">cumulation was substantial (Figure 4b), showing that despite the lack of an MGR (Figures 2, 3), these plants had gained a qualitative benefit from AM symbiosis. Although the growth of these plants was apparently limited by some factor, the higher nutrient content represents a potential advantage in fitness that can be translated into growth or in the production of additional offspring at a later stage of development.

On the other end of the scale, plants treated with only Pi alone were colonized to 30% but had no positive n class="Chemical">MGR anpan>d no inpan>ductionpan> of the symbiotic Pi uptake machinpan>ery. Notably, these planpan>ts evenpan> conpan>tainpan>ed lower nutrienpan>t levels thanpan> nonpan>-mycorrhizal conpan>trol planpan>ts treated with Pi onpan>ly, henpan>ce, under these conpan>ditionpan>s, the inpan>teractionpan> exhibited characteristics of a parasitic inpan>teractionpan>.

MGR varies conpan>siderably with some planpan>t species showinpan>g spectacular increases of >10-fold. Such cases are usually based on the bad performance of the plant in the absence of the fungal partner, a phenomenon that is expressed as ‘dependency’ of the plant on AM [85]. In contrast, many species, in particular cereals, show no (or even negative) MGR, and therefore are considered non-responsive [85], [86]. However, it has been pointed out that such classifications represent an oversimplification [26], since the outcome of an interaction depends on both partners and involves environmental factors [87]. Indeed, our study shows that the environment has a strong influence on the MGR of Petunia hybrida with R. irregularis. Although plants in natural environments may experience less extreme conditions than in our experiments, our results show that depending on the nutritional conditions, an AM interaction can represent a range of outcomes along the continuum between strongly mutualistic and parasitic [88]. However, it should be kept in mind that mycorrhizal plants with neutral or negative MGR may profit from other benefits than improved nutrition, for example increased drought tolerance or disease resistance [7]–[9].

Conclusions

Nutrient-dependent regulation of AM colonization provides an important feedback mechanpan>ism for planpan>ts to promote or limit fungal colonpan>izationpan> accordinpan>g to their needs. We show here that the nutrienpan>ts Pi anpan>d pan> class="Chemical">nitrate can potentially exert negative regulation on AM, whereas sulfate and the cations Mg2+, Ca2+, and Fe3+ have no effect. On the other hand, starvation for several mineral nutrients, in particular for nitrate, reversed the inhibitory effect of Pi on AM, indicating that nutrient starvation triggers a dominant AM-promoting signal that counteracts the effects of high Pi. Future research should address the interplay of exogenous and endogenous factors in AM, in particular, how nutrients impinge on symbiotic signaling and on the subsequent cellular program in host cells.

Nutrient content of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants under difn class="Chemical">ferenpan>t nutritionpan>al treatmenpan>ts. Nutrienpan>t levels were determinpan>ed inpan> the leaves of planpan>ts treated with onpan>ly pan> class="Chemical">water, with basic nutrient solution (Nutr.), with 5 mM KH2PO4 (P), or with a combination of nutrient solution and 5 mM KH2PO4 (Nutr.+P). Plants were harvested 36 days after inoculation with R. irregularis (black columns) or mock inoculation (white columns). Columns represent the average of three biological replicates, error bars represent the standard deviations.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

Predicted amino acid sequences of n class="Chemical">nitrate anpan>d pan> class="Chemical">nitrite transporters of and used for phylogenetic analysis.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Nutrient content of plant growth substrate.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

Composition of nutrient solutions.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

Microarray data after first level analysis by Nimblegen. Mean gene expression values (Exprs) and variation coefficients (SE_Exprs) resulting from the three probes per sequence ID are listed for the difn class="Chemical">ferenpan>t nutritionpan>al regimes. All the inpan>ductionpan> ratios shownpan> inpan> Tables S4 anpan>d S5, anpan>d Table 1, are derived from the data listed inpan> Table S3.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

Genes regulated by high Pi supply. Gene expression ratios above 2-fold and below 0.5-fold of genes with a predicted role in mineral nutrient acquisition are shown. Expression ratios were obtained by dividing the expression values from the treatment of interest (indicated combinations of basic nutrient solution, 5 mM n class="Chemical">KH2PO4, anpan>d pan> class="Species">R. irregularis) by the expression values of the reference treatment, i.e. non-mycorrhizal fertilized plants (see Table S3 for individual expression values). Expression ratios were sorted according to the treatment with high Pi alone (treatment 7). Note that the ten genes induced at highest levels comprise eight N-related genes (in bold), in particular transporters (see also Table 1).

(XLS)

Click here for additional data file.

Nutritional regulation of genes involved in nutrient acquisition. Expression ratios as in Table S4 but ordered according to predicted function.

(XLS)

Click here for additional data file.

Primers for quantitative real time RT-PCR (qPCR).

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.