Literature DB >> 24606308

Susceptibility to interference by music and speech maskers in middle-aged adults.

Deniz Başkent1, Suzanne van Engelshoven2, John J Galvin3.   

Abstract

Older listeners commonly complain about difficulty in understanding speech in noise. Previous studies have shown an age effect for both speech and steady noise maskers, and it is largest for speech maskers. In the present study, speech reception thresholds (SRTs) measured with competing speech, music, and steady noise maskers significantly differed between young (19 to 26 years) and middle-aged (51 to 63 years) adults. SRT differences ranged from 2.1 dB for competing speech, 0.4-1.6 dB for music maskers, and 0.8 dB for steady noise. The data suggest that aging effects are already evident in middle-aged adults without significant hearing impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606308      PMCID: PMC4043475          DOI: 10.1121/1.4865261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold.

Authors:  N J Versfeld; L Daalder; J M Festen; T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion.

Authors:  A J Blood; R J Zatorre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Informational masking and musical training.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Brian J Fligor; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span.

Authors:  Denise C Park; Gary Lautenschlager; Trey Hedden; Natalie S Davidson; Anderson D Smith; Pamela K Smith
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-06

5.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners.

Authors:  Patricia A Tun; Gail O'Kane; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-09

7.  Age-related decrement in hearing for speech. Sampling and longitudinal studies.

Authors:  M Bergman; V G Blumenfeld; D Cascardo; B Dash; H Levitt; M K Margulies
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1976-09

8.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.

Authors:  M K Pichora-Fuller; B A Schneider; M Daneman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of a music therapy strategy on depressed older adults.

Authors:  S B Hanser; L W Thompson
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-11

10.  Perceptual restoration of degraded speech is preserved with advancing age.

Authors:  Jefta D Saija; Elkan G Akyürek; Tjeerd C Andringa; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-07
View more
  13 in total

1.  Early aging and postural control while listening and responding.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard van Emmerik; Jacob J Banks; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Song Properties and Familiarity Affect Speech Recognition in Musical Noise.

Authors:  Jane A Brown; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Psychomusicology       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  Competing Speech Perception in Middle Age.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Temporal Processing Deficits in Middle Age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 5.  Hearing and speech processing in midlife.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Postural Control While Listening in Younger and Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman; Richard van Emmerik; Jacob Banks
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Measurement of Acceptable Noise Level with Background Music.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Ahn; Junghwa Bahng; Jae Hee Lee
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-09-16

8.  Do gender differences in audio-visual benefit and visual influence in audio-visual speech perception emerge with age?

Authors:  Magnus Alm; Dawn Behne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-16

9.  Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.

Authors:  Lisa Kilman; Adriana Zekveld; Mathias Hällgren; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; John J Galvin; Bert Maat; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.