Literature DB >> 36246453

Song Properties and Familiarity Affect Speech Recognition in Musical Noise.

Jane A Brown1,2, Gavin M Bidelman1,2,3.   

Abstract

"Cocktail party" speech perception is largely studied using either linguistic or nonspeech noise maskers. Few studies have addressed how listeners understand speech during concurrent music. We used popular songs to probe the effects of familiarity and different inherent properties of background music (i.e., isolated vocals, isolated instruments, or unprocessed song) on speech recognition. Participants performed an open-set sentence recognition task in the presence of familiar and unfamiliar music maskers (-5 dB signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]) composed of the full unprocessed song, only the instrumentals, or only the vocals. We found that full songs negatively affected recognition performance more so than isolated vocals and instrumentals. Surprisingly, there was also an interaction with music familiarity; well-known music impaired performance in the homologous full song and instrumental conditions. Our results show strong effects of song component and familiarity on speech recognition ability, highlighting interactions between both physical and psychological characteristics of musical noise on task performance. Familiarity impairs speech perception when background music features the instrumentals with or without the vocals. Our findings have implications for understanding the possible facilitation (or interference) of background music during concurrent linguistic tasks including academic study in attempts to promote learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cocktail party scenario; familiarity; music-language transfer effects; speech in noise

Year:  2022        PMID: 36246453      PMCID: PMC9562996          DOI: 10.1037/pmu0000284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychomusicology        ISSN: 0275-3987


  24 in total

1.  Tempo of background sound and performance speed.

Authors:  H Nittono; A Tsuda; S Akai; Y Nakajima
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2000-06

2.  Background music and cognitive performance.

Authors:  Leslie A Angel; Donald J Polzella; Greg C Elvers
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2010-06

3.  Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect.

Authors:  W F Thompson; E G Schellenberg; G Husain
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

4.  Tune in or tune out: age-related differences in listening to speech in music.

Authors:  Frank A Russo; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Pupils dilate for vocal or familiar music.

Authors:  Michael W Weiss; Sandra E Trehub; E Glenn Schellenberg; Peter Habashi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

8.  Effects of familiarity of music on vigilant performance.

Authors:  C W Fontaine; N D Schwalm
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1979-08

9.  Effects of music on work-rate distribution during a cycling time trial.

Authors:  G Atkinson; D Wilson; M Eubank
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Eskridge; John J Galvin; Justin M Aronoff; Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.