Literature DB >> 24606279

Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Olaf Strelcyk1, Shareka Pentony1, Sridhar Kalluri1, Brent Edwards1.   

Abstract

There exist perceptible differences between sound emanating from a talker who faces and a talker who does not face a listener: Sound from a non-facing talker is attenuated and acquires a spectral tilt. The present study assessed the role that these facing-orientation cues play for speech perception. Digit identification for a frontal target talker in the presence of two spatially separated interfering talkers was measured for 10 normal-hearing (NH) and 11 hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. Overall-level differences and spectral tilts were reproduced by means of digital filtering and playback via loudspeakers. Both NH and HI listeners performed significantly better when the interfering talkers were simulated not to be facing them. Spectral tilts and level differences across talkers reduced target-interferer confusions. They enabled the NH listeners to sequentially stream the digits. This was not the case for the HI listeners, who showed smaller benefits, irrespective of whether they were aided by their own hearing aids or not. While hearing-aid amplification increased audibility, it may not have aided target-interferer segregation or target selection. The present results suggest that facing orientation cannot be neglected in the exploration of speech perception in multitalker situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606279     DOI: 10.1121/1.4864786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Horizontal directivity patterns differ between vowels extracted from running speech.

Authors:  Paulina Kocon; Brian B Monson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Jenna Rock; Anneliese Schulz; Elissa Hoffman; Emily Buss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effect of age and hearing loss on auditory stream segregation of speech sounds.

Authors:  Marion David; Alexis N Tausend; Olaf Strelcyk; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Extended High Frequencies Provide Both Spectral and Temporal Information to Improve Speech-in-Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Allison Trine; Brian B Monson
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.

Authors:  Meredith D Braza; Nicole E Corbin; Emily Buss; Brian B Monson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.