Literature DB >> 24606239

Ultrastructural characteristics of three undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cell lines and their differentiated three-dimensional derivatives: a comparative study.

Suzan Alharbi1, Mona Elsafadi, Mohammed Mobarak, Ali Alrwili, Radhakrishnan Vishnubalaji, Muthurangan Manikandan, Fatma Al-Qudsi, Saleh Karim, May Al-Nabaheen, Abdullah Aldahmash, Amer Mahmood.   

Abstract

The fine structures of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) grown as colonies and differentiated in three-dimensional (3D) culture as embryoid bodies (EBs) were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. Undifferentiated mESCs expressed markers that proved their pluripotency. Differentiated EBs expressed different differentiation marker proteins from the three germ layers. The ultrastructure of mESCs revealed the presence of microvilli on the cell surfaces, large and deep infolded nuclei, low cytoplasm-to-nuclear ratios, frequent lipid droplets, nonprominent Golgi apparatus, and smooth endoplasmic reticulum. In addition, we found prominent juvenile mitochondria and free ribosomes-rich cytoplasm in mESCs. Ultrastructure of the differentiated mESCs as EBs showed different cell arrangements, which indicate the different stages of EB development and differentiation. The morphologies of BALB/c and 129 W9.5 EBs were very similar at day 4, whereas C57BL/6 EBs were distinct from the others at day 4. This finding suggested that differentiation of EBs from different cell lines occurs in the same pattern but not at the same rate. Conversely, the ultrastructure results of BALB/c and 129 W9.5 ESCs revealed differentiating features, such as the dilated profile of a rough endoplasmic reticulum. In addition, we found low expression levels of undifferentiated markers on the outer cells of BALB/c and 129 W9.5 mESC colonies, which suggests a faster differentiation potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606239      PMCID: PMC3967378          DOI: 10.1089/cell.2013.0073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Reprogram        ISSN: 2152-4971            Impact factor:   1.987


  63 in total

1.  Establishment and in vitro differentiation of a new embryonic stem cell line from human blastocyst.

Authors:  Hossein Baharvand; Saeid Kazemi Ashtiani; Mojtaba Rezazadeh Valojerdi; Abdolhossein Shahverdi; Adeleh Taee; Davood Sabour
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.880

Review 2.  History and perspective of stem cell research.

Authors:  Ariff Bongso; Mark Richards
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 3.  Embryonic stem cells: understanding their history, cell biology and signalling.

Authors:  Ruairi Friel; Sjaak van der Sar; Patrick J Mee
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  A hierarchical network controls protein translation during murine embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation.

Authors:  Prabha Sampath; David K Pritchard; Lil Pabon; Hans Reinecke; Stephen M Schwartz; David R Morris; Charles E Murry
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides.

Authors:  A G Smith; J K Heath; D D Donaldson; G G Wong; J Moreau; M Stahl; D Rogers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Ultrastructural observations of preimplantation stages of the sheep.

Authors:  P G Calarco; A McLaren
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1976-12

7.  Pancreatic exocrine enzyme-producing cell differentiation via embryoid bodies from human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Sakiko Shirasawa; Susumu Yoshie; Fengming Yue; Hinako Ichikawa; Tadayuki Yokoyama; Mika Nagai; Daihachiro Tomotsune; Masao Hirayama; Katsunori Sasaki
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  An in vitro embryotoxicity assay based on the disturbance of the differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells into endothelial cells. II. Testing of compounds.

Authors:  Matthias Festag; Bruno Viertel; Pablo Steinberg; Claudia Sehner
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Critical evaluation of human blastocysts for assisted reproduction techniques and embryonic stem cell biotechnology.

Authors:  Henry Sathananthan; Sulochana Gunasheela; Judith Menezes
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function.

Authors:  Ariel A Avilion; Silvia K Nicolis; Larysa H Pevny; Lidia Perez; Nigel Vivian; Robin Lovell-Badge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mitochondria structural reorganization during mouse embryonic stem cell derivation.

Authors:  Lyubov A Suldina; Ksenia N Morozova; Aleksei G Menzorov; Elena A Kizilova; Elena Kiseleva
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  Ultrastructural comparison of porcine putative embryonic stem cells derived by in vitro fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Hyunju Yoo; Eunhye Kim; Seon-Ung Hwang; Junchul David Yoon; Yubyeol Jeon; Kyu-Mi Park; Kyu-Jun Kim; Minghui Jin; Chang-Kyu Lee; Eunsong Lee; Hyunggee Kim; Gonhyung Kim; Sang-Hwan Hyun
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.214

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.