Literature DB >> 24604393

Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.

Maureen A Kelly1, Eileen M Roscoe, Gregory P Hanley, Kevin Schlichenmeyer.   

Abstract

Although researchers have evaluated assessment methods for identifying preferred tangible and edible items for children with developmental disabilities, few have evaluated assessment methods for identifying preferred topographies of attention. In the current study, indirect and direct assessments were conducted to identify 7 topographies of attention to include in subsequent preference and reinforcer assessments. Two different assessment formats were evaluated until reliable results were achieved with 1 of them. In both formats, a therapist presented photos that depicted the topographies of attention included in the stimulus array, and a control card (resulting in no consequence) was included. After evaluation of the 2 formats, a reinforcer assessment was conducted with a socially relevant target behavior (i.e., mands) to determine the predictive validity of the preference assessments. © Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; autism; preference assessment; reinforcer assessment; social reinforcers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24604393     DOI: 10.1002/jaba.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  2 in total

1.  An Analysis of Feedback from a Behavior Analytic Perspective.

Authors:  Kathleen A Mangiapanello; Nancy S Hemmes
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 2.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.