Literature DB >> 24604319

Chromosomal instability portends superior response of rectal adenocarcinoma to chemoradiation therapy.

Bassem I Zaki1, Arief A Suriawinata, Alan R Eastman, Kristen M Garner, Samuel F Bakhoum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persistent chromosome segregation errors represent a conspicuous feature of human neoplasms. It is widely accepted that this chromosomal instability is associated with poor prognosis; however, its effect on therapeutic response is a matter of conjecture.
METHODS: Here, the role of chromosome segregation errors in the response of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma to chemoradiation therapy (CRT) was examined. Pretreatment samples from 62 patients were surveyed for evidence of chromosome mis-segregation and mis-segregation frequency was correlated to the pathological response to CRT as determined by the tumor regression grade after surgical resection of irradiated tumors.
RESULTS: Surprisingly, it was found that errors in chromosome segregation predicted enhanced pathological response of rectal adenocarcinoma to CRT (odds ratio, 3.9; P = .02). Furthermore, tumor response inversely correlated with the frequency of cells that exhibited segregation errors during anaphase (correlation coefficient, 0.94; P < .05). Strikingly, elevated chromosome mis-segregation combined with decreased levels of the DNA damage repair protein Mre11 portended a markedly enhanced response (odds ratio, 54.0; P = .008).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrate that chromosomal instability is a favorable predictor of response to CRT in patients with locally invasive rectal adenocarcinoma. Therefore, the authors propose that downstream structural damage to chromosomes resulting from segregation errors potentiates the effect of DNA-damaging therapies and synergizes with deficiencies in the DNA repair machinery. This work identifies a novel mechanistic marker that foretells treatment response to CRT and suggests that concomitant targeting of whole-chromosome segregation and DNA repair may constitute an effective therapeutic strategy.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaphase; aneuploidy; chemoradiation therapy; chromosomal instability; genetic instability; mitosis; radiation oncology; rectal cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24604319     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

Review 1.  Mitotic DNA Damage Response: At the Crossroads of Structural and Numerical Cancer Chromosome Instabilities.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Duane A Compton; Simon N Powell; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 2.  The Multifaceted Role of Chromosomal Instability in Cancer and Its Microenvironment.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  A P53-Independent DNA Damage Response Suppresses Oncogenic Proliferation and Genome Instability.

Authors:  Katerina D Fagan-Solis; Dennis A Simpson; Rashmi J Kumar; Luciano G Martelotto; Lisle E Mose; Naim U Rashid; Alice Y Ho; Simon N Powell; Y Hannah Wen; Joel S Parker; Jorge S Reis-Filho; John H J Petrini; Gaorav P Gupta
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Phyllanthus emblica Linn. fruit extract potentiates the anticancer efficacy of mitomycin C and cisplatin and reduces their genotoxicity to normal cells in vitro.

Authors:  Xi-Han Guo; Juan Ni; Jing-Lun Xue; Xu Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017 Dec.       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 5.  Living in CIN: Mitotic Infidelity and Its Consequences for Tumor Promotion and Suppression.

Authors:  Laura C Funk; Lauren M Zasadil; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Numerical chromosomal instability mediates susceptibility to radiation treatment.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Matthew D Wood; Christopher D Laucius; Dian Qu; Ashley M Laughney; Gloria E Reynolds; Raymond J Louie; Joanna Phillips; Denise A Chan; Bassem I Zaki; John P Murnane; Claudia Petritsch; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  Chromosome Missegregation as a Modulator of Radiation Sensitivity.

Authors:  Pippa F Cosper; Sarah E Copeland; John B Tucker; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.934

8.  Overexpression of satellite RNAs in heterochromatin induces chromosomal instability and reflects drug sensitivity in mouse cancer cells.

Authors:  Sawako Tamaki; Koichi Suzuki; Iku Abe; Yuhei Endo; Nao Kakizawa; Fumiaki Watanabe; Masaaki Saito; Shingo Tsujinaka; Yasuyuki Miyakura; Satoshi Ohta; Kenji Tago; Ken Yanagisawa; Fumio Konishi; Toshiki Rikiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 9.  Centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability and cancer: mechanistic, clinical and therapeutic issues.

Authors:  Marco Raffaele Cosenza; Alwin Krämer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 10.  Centrosome Aberrations as Drivers of Chromosomal Instability in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Katrina M Piemonte; Lindsey J Anstine; Ruth A Keri
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.