Literature DB >> 2460315

Spatial gradients of visual attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

G R Mangun1, S A Hillyard.   

Abstract

The spatial distribution of visual attention was investigated by measuring target detectability (d') and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to stimuli at varying distances from an attended locus. Vertical bars were flashed rapidly in random order to 1 of 3 locations: one in each of the lateral visual fields and one on the vertical meridian above the fixation point. Subjects maintained eye fixation while directing their attention to 1 of the 3 locations for the duration of each 1.75 min run. Their primary task was to detect infrequent, shorter target bars at the attended location. A secondary task was to respond to shorter target bars at either of the 2 unattended locations if they 'happened to notice them' (without trying to detect them). ERPs and d' scores were obtained to the lateral field stimuli both when they were specifically attended (primary task), as well as when attention was focused upon midline or opposite-field flashes (secondary task). Both d' scores and the amplitudes of the P135 and N190 waves decreased progressively as attention was directed to locations increasingly distant from a given lateral stimulus. These results support 'gradient' models of the spatial distribution of visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2460315     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90019-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  53 in total

1.  Attentional diversion during adaptation affects the velocity as well as the duration of motion after-effects.

Authors:  M S Georgiades; J P Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Delayed effects of attention in visual cortex as measured with fMRI.

Authors:  Seth E Bouvier; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Visuospatial attention: beyond a spotlight model.

Authors:  K R Cave; N P Bichot
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

4.  The effect of attentional cueing on conscious awareness of stimulus and response.

Authors:  Helen Johnson; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency.

Authors:  Jian Ding; George Sperling; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: I. cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson; Seppo P Ahlfors; Clifford D Saron
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: II. effects of selective intersensory attentional deployments on subsequent sensory processing.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision.

Authors:  J-M Hopf; C N Boehler; S J Luck; J K Tsotsos; H-J Heinze; M A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Multiple sources of positive- and negative-priming effects: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Henning Gibbons; Thomas H Rammsayer; Jutta Stahl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

10.  Asymmetry of the amplitude-time properties of directed saccades in monkeys depending on the complexity of the spatial scheme of visual stimulation.

Authors:  L V Tereshchenko; S A Molchanov; O V Kolesnikova; A V Latanov; V V Shul'govskii
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.