Literature DB >> 24603024

Bad and worse: neural systems underlying reappraisal of high- and low-intensity negative emotions.

Jennifer A Silvers1, Jochen Weber2, Tor D Wager2, Kevin N Ochsner2.   

Abstract

One of the most effective strategies for regulating emotional responses is cognitive reappraisal. While prior work has made great strides in characterizing reappraisal's neural mechanisms and behavioral outcomes, the key issue of how regulation varies as a function of emotional intensity remains unaddressed. We compared the behavioral and neural correlates of reappraisal of high- and low-intensity emotional responses using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We found that successful reappraisal of both high- and low-intensity emotions depends upon recruitment of dorsomedial (dmPFC) as well as left dorsolateral (dlPFC) and ventrolateral (vlPFC) prefrontal cortex. However, reappraisal of high-intensity emotions more strongly activated left dlPFC, and in addition, activated right lateral and dorsomedial PFC regions not recruited by low-intensity reappraisal. No brain regions were more strongly recruited during reappraisal of low when compared with high-intensity emotions. Taken together, these results suggest that reappraisal of high-intensity emotion requires greater cognitive resources as evidenced by quantitative and qualitative differences in prefrontal recruitment. These data have implications for understanding how and when specific PFC systems are needed to regulate different types of emotional responses.
© The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  emotional intensity; reappraisal

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24603024      PMCID: PMC4321618          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsu043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  48 in total

1.  Arousal dissociates amygdala and hippocampal fear responses: evidence from simultaneous fMRI and skin conductance recording.

Authors:  L M Williams; M L Phillips; M J Brammer; D Skerrett; J Lagopoulos; C Rennie; H Bahramali; G Olivieri; A S David; A Peduto; E Gordon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

Authors:  James J Gross; Oliver P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

3.  Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; John Jonides; Susan Reading
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  The frontal lobes and the regulation of mental activity.

Authors:  Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Marina Bedny; Robert F Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  The intensity of emotion.

Authors:  J W Brehm
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  1999

Review 8.  The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Anticipatory brain activity predicts the success or failure of subsequent emotion regulation.

Authors:  Bryan T Denny; Kevin N Ochsner; Jochen Weber; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Fear is only as deep as the mind allows: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on the regulation of negative affect.

Authors:  Esther Kristina Diekhof; Katharina Geier; Peter Falkai; Oliver Gruber
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  32 in total

1.  Emotional intensity influences pre-implementation and implementation of distraction and reappraisal.

Authors:  Roni Shafir; Naama Schwartz; Jens Blechert; Gal Sheppes
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Lateral and medial prefrontal contributions to emotion generation by semantic elaboration during episodic encoding.

Authors:  Takumi Kaneda; Yayoi Shigemune; Takashi Tsukiura
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Recent Advances in Laboratory Assessment of Emotion Regulation.

Authors:  Saren H Seeley; Emmanuel Garcia; Douglas S Mennin
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  Localized or diffuse: the link between prefrontal cortex volume and cognitive reappraisal.

Authors:  M Moore; A D Iordan; Y Hu; J E Kragel; S Dolcos; F Dolcos
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  vlPFC-vmPFC-Amygdala Interactions Underlie Age-Related Differences in Cognitive Regulation of Emotion.

Authors:  Jennifer A Silvers; Catherine Insel; Alisa Powers; Peter Franz; Chelsea Helion; Rebecca E Martin; Jochen Weber; Walter Mischel; B J Casey; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The neural bases of cognitive emotion regulation: The roles of strategy and intensity.

Authors:  Craig A Moodie; Gaurav Suri; Dustin S Goerlitz; Maria A Mateen; Gal Sheppes; Kateri McRae; Shreya Lakhan-Pal; Ravi Thiruchselvam; James J Gross
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Neural circuitry of emotion regulation: Effects of appraisal, attention, and cortisol administration.

Authors:  Sean T Ma; James L Abelson; Go Okada; Stephan F Taylor; Israel Liberzon
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  A quick behavioral dichotic word test is prognostic for clinical response to cognitive therapy for depression: A replication study.

Authors:  Gerard E Bruder; Agnes Haggerty; Greg J Siegle
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Lateralization for speech predicts therapeutic response to cognitive behavioral therapy for depression.

Authors:  Ronit Kishon; Karen Abraham; Daniel M Alschuler; John G Keilp; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  Emotion regulation deficits in regular marijuana users.

Authors:  Kaeli Zimmermann; Christina Walz; Raissa T Derckx; Keith M Kendrick; Bernd Weber; Bruce Dore; Kevin N Ochsner; René Hurlemann; Benjamin Becker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.