Kathleen D Brooks1, Robert D Acton2, Karla Hemesath2, Connie C Schmitz2. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: kdbrooks@umn.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Rural longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) programs for third-year medical students provide strong educational curricula and can nurture interest in rural surgical practice. Students learn technical skills in an apprenticeship model. Variability in instruction and patient experiences across sites, coupled with a lack of simulation facilities, raise some concerns about technical skill development. To explore the adequacy of skills acquisition for students in the University of Minnesota Rural Physician Associate Program (RPAP), this study compared RPAP students' performance on a scenario-based Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) with that of traditional surgery block clerkship students (Course 7500). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a nonexperimental post-only study. All enrolled students (n = 254) completed the OSATS examination. Students in the Course 7500 (n = 222) completed 15 hours of simulation skills training and supervised practice during their 6-week clerkship. RPAP students (n = 32) completed 3 hours of skills training before their 9-month rural assignment. Both groups had access to comprehensive online materials. Mean OSATS checklist, global rating, and total scores were compared at the end of training using t tests (p < 0.05). Self-reported OR and clinical experiences were explored. RESULTS: Both groups did well on the OSATS. There were no statistical differences in completion time, checklist scores, mean global ratings, or total scores. RPAP students reported significantly more days in the OR, surgery cases, and first assists. Experience with OSATS tasks reported by RPAP students during clinical rotations correlated with their OSATS performance. CONCLUSION: This study supports the viability of the LIC model for fundamental skills acquisition when augmented with introductory simulation skills training and online resources. It also suggests that simulation fills a training gap for students in a traditional surgery block clerkship program. It opens a dialog about the potential partnership of surgery departments with rural LICs to address rural general surgery shortages. Further research in this aspect is needed.
OBJECTIVES:Rural longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) programs for third-year medical students provide strong educational curricula and can nurture interest in rural surgical practice. Students learn technical skills in an apprenticeship model. Variability in instruction and patient experiences across sites, coupled with a lack of simulation facilities, raise some concerns about technical skill development. To explore the adequacy of skills acquisition for students in the University of Minnesota Rural Physician Associate Program (RPAP), this study compared RPAP students' performance on a scenario-based Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) with that of traditional surgery block clerkship students (Course 7500). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a nonexperimental post-only study. All enrolled students (n = 254) completed the OSATS examination. Students in the Course 7500 (n = 222) completed 15 hours of simulation skills training and supervised practice during their 6-week clerkship. RPAP students (n = 32) completed 3 hours of skills training before their 9-month rural assignment. Both groups had access to comprehensive online materials. Mean OSATS checklist, global rating, and total scores were compared at the end of training using t tests (p < 0.05). Self-reported OR and clinical experiences were explored. RESULTS: Both groups did well on the OSATS. There were no statistical differences in completion time, checklist scores, mean global ratings, or total scores. RPAP students reported significantly more days in the OR, surgery cases, and first assists. Experience with OSATS tasks reported by RPAP students during clinical rotations correlated with their OSATS performance. CONCLUSION: This study supports the viability of the LIC model for fundamental skills acquisition when augmented with introductory simulation skills training and online resources. It also suggests that simulation fills a training gap for students in a traditional surgery block clerkship program. It opens a dialog about the potential partnership of surgery departments with rural LICs to address rural general surgery shortages. Further research in this aspect is needed.