| Literature DB >> 24602283 |
A Garthe1, Z Huang, L Kaczmarek, R K Filipkowski, G Kempermann.
Abstract
Studies using the Morris water maze to assess hippocampal function in animals, in which adult hippocampal neurogenesis had been suppressed, have yielded seemingly contradictory results. Cyclin D2 knockout (Ccnd2(-/-)) mice, for example, have constitutively suppressed adult hippocampal neurogenesis but had no overt phenotype in the water maze. In other paradigms, however, ablation of adult neurogenesis was associated with specific deficits in the water maze. Therefore, we hypothesized that the neurogenesis-related phenotype might also become detectable in Ccnd2(-/-) mice, if we used the exact setup and protocol that in our previous study had revealed deficits in mice with suppressed adult neurogenesis. Ccnd2(-/-) mice indeed learned the task and developed a normal preference for the goal quadrant, but were significantly less precise for the exact goal position and were slower in acquiring efficient and spatially more precise search strategies. Upon goal reversal (when the hidden platform was moved to a new position) Ccnd2(-/-) mice showed increased perseverance at the former platform location, implying that they were less flexible in updating the previously learned information. Both with respect to adult neurogenesis and behavioral performance, Ccnd2(+/-) mice ranged between wild types and knockouts. Importantly, hippocampus-dependent learning was not generally impaired by the mutation, but specifically functional aspects relying on precise and flexible encoding were affected. Whether ablation of adult neurogenesis causes a specific behavioral phenotype thus also depends on the actual task demands. The test parameters appear to be important variables influencing whether a task can pick up a contribution of adult neurogenesis to test performance.Entities:
Keywords: Adult neurogenesis; Morris water maze; cognitive flexibility; dentate gyrus; pattern separation; plasticity; proliferation; spatial learning; stem cells; strategies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24602283 PMCID: PMC4314690 DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Brain Behav ISSN: 1601-183X Impact factor: 3.449
Figure 2Differences in spatial learning abilities of Ccnd2−/−, Ccnd2+/− and wild-type mice in the water maze. (a) Experimental protocol including a first acquisition followed by another acquisition after moving the platform to the opposite quadrant. (b) Path length to reach the hidden platform. Shown are means ± standard deviations. (c) Probe trial performance indicated by time spent in the target quadrant (TQ, intense colors) vs. other quadrants combined (faint colors). (d) Target accuracy in probe trial indicated by heat maps. Dark red zones represent a sixfold presence probability. (e) Precise encoding of goal position indicated by number of crossings of former goal positions. (f) Precision of initial goal approaches indicated by the average initial heading error. (g) Examples of search strategies used for algorithm-based strategy classification. (h) Contribution of respective search strategies to group performance. Color code as indicated in (g). (i) Reversal learning performance indicated by trials needed to regain the average path length reached before goal reversal.
Figure 1Quantitative assessment of proliferating cells (BrdU-labeled) in wild-type (Ccnd2+/+) mice, Ccnd2+/− and Ccnd2−/−animals. (a) The images show BrdU-stained hippocampal sections showing substantially decreased proliferation in the knockouts compared with wild-type controls, as well as between Ccnd2+/− and wild types. Scale bar is 100 µm. (b) Compared with wild types, BrdU-labeled cells were immensely decreased in both Ccnd2−/− (P < 0.001) and Ccnd2+/− mice (P = 0.022).