Literature DB >> 20035800

Sex differences in human virtual water maze performance: novel measures reveal the relative contribution of directional responding and spatial knowledge.

Daniel G Woolley1, Ben Vermaercke, Hans Op de Beeck, Johan Wagemans, Ilse Gantois, Rudi D'Hooge, Stephan P Swinnen, Nicole Wenderoth.   

Abstract

Sex differences in humans on virtual water maze navigation are well established when overall performance is measured, e.g., by the total time taken to find the hidden platform, total path length, or quadrant dwell time during probe trials. Currently, it is unknown whether males are better spatial learners than females, or if overall performance differences reflect other aspects of the task unrelated to spatial memory. Here, males and females were tested on a virtual analogue of the Morris water maze. We devised a novel method of analysis in which each trial was divided into an initial trajectory phase and search phase. We also implemented a new measure of spatial learning during early and late training, by including trials in which subjects were only required to indicate where they thought the hidden target zone was located. Consistent with previous reports, males outperformed females on overall measures of task performance. Males also performed significantly better on all initial trajectory phase variables. Interestingly, only small (non-significant) differences were observed during the search phase and when spatial learning was tested without the constraints of a typical water maze trial. Our results suggest that spatial knowledge regarding the location of the hidden target zone is not the main factor responsible for overall sex differences in virtual water maze performance. Instead, the largest sex differences were observed during the initial trajectory phase of the trial, which is thought to depend on effective processing of distal features of the environment. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20035800     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  29 in total

1.  Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism?

Authors:  Sabine U König; Caspar Goeke; Tobias Meilinger; Peter König
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Effects of chromosomal sex and hormonal influences on shaping sex differences in brain and behavior: Lessons from cases of disorders of sex development.

Authors:  Matthew S Bramble; Allen Lipson; Neerja Vashist; Eric Vilain
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Spontaneous fast gamma activity in the septal hippocampal region correlates with spatial learning in humans.

Authors:  B R Cornwell; C Overstreet; C Grillon
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Distinct contributions of human hippocampal theta to spatial cognition and anxiety.

Authors:  Brian R Cornwell; Nicole Arkin; Cassie Overstreet; Frederick W Carver; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Age, sex, and handedness differentially contribute to neurospatial function on the Memory Island and Novel-Image Novel-Location tests.

Authors:  Brian J Piper; Summer F Acevedo; Krystle R Edwards; Alan B Curtiss; Gwendolyn J McGinnis; Jacob Raber
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-04-02

6.  Local N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonism in the prefrontal cortex attenuates spatial cognitive deficits induced by gonadectomy in adult male rats.

Authors:  M N Locklear; S Bhamidipaty; M F Kritzer
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Sex differences in spatial navigation and perception in human adolescents and emerging adults.

Authors:  Jennifer T Sneider; Derek A Hamilton; Julia E Cohen-Gilbert; David J Crowley; Isabelle M Rosso; Marisa M Silveri
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Assessment of the effects of sex and sex hormones on spatial cognition in adult rats using the Barnes maze.

Authors:  M N Locklear; M F Kritzer
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 9.  Neurobiological mechanisms underlying sex-related differences in stress-related disorders: Effects of neuroactive steroids on the hippocampus.

Authors:  Katharina M Hillerer; David A Slattery; Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 8.606

10.  Effects of testosterone dose on spatial memory among castrated adult male rats.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wagner; Valerie C Braddick; Christopher G Batson; Brendan H Cullen; L Erin Miller; Mark D Spritzer
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.905

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.