Literature DB >> 23877132

Gene patents: a broken incentives system.

Yun-Han Huang1.   

Abstract

The proliferation of patents on human genes has raised important ethical questions centered on the conflict of patient rights and intellectual property rights. With the Supreme Court's June 2013 decision that altered the patent eligibility of genetic material, it is important to reexamine the ethical implications of gene patents as a concept. Such patents suggest an ownership of genetic material that may hinder access to healthcare and inhibit medical progress. The application of the current patent system to genetic material thus violates patients' rights without fulfilling the system's goal of promoting innovation, suggesting a need for a revised incentives infrastructure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23877132      PMCID: PMC3819421          DOI: 10.1007/s10943-013-9758-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Relig Health        ISSN: 0022-4197


  10 in total

Review 1.  Patent or perish? An ethical approach to patenting human genes and proteins.

Authors:  D R J Macer
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.550

2.  Patenting and licensing in genetic testing: ethical, legal, and social issues.

Authors:  Sirpa Soini; Ségolène Aymé; Gert Matthijs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Access to life-saving medicines and intellectual property rights: an ethical assessment.

Authors:  Doris Schroeder; Peter Singer
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  PARP inhibitors in breast cancer: BRCA and beyond.

Authors:  Jorge Rios; Shannon Puhalla
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  What are gene patents and why are people worried about them?

Authors:  Jon F Merz; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2005

6.  Patently unpatentable: implications of the Myriad court decision on genetic diagnostics.

Authors:  Mildred Cho
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 7.  Effectiveness of preventive interventions in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers: a systematic review.

Authors:  M J Bermejo-Pérez; S Márquez-Calderón; A Llanos-Méndez
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Myriad Genetics: In the eye of the policy storm.

Authors:  E Richard Gold; Julia Carbone
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for inherited susceptibility to cancer: comparing breast and ovarian cancers with colon cancers.

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; Christopher DeRienzo; Julia Carbone; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Christopher Heaney; Christopher Conover
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Impact of gene patents and licensing practices on access to genetic testing for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Christopher Heaney; Tamara James; Chris Conover; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Phase changes in the BRCA policy domain.

Authors:  Stephen M Modell; Susan B King; Toby Citrin; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2014-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.