Literature DB >> 24599207

Liquid nitrogen or phenolization for giant cell tumor of bone?: a comparative cohort study of various standard treatments at two tertiary referral centers.

Lizz van der Heijden1, Ingrid C M van der Geest2, H W Bart Schreuder2, Michiel A J van de Sande1, P D Sander Dijkstra1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone is decreased by use of adjuvant treatments such as phenol, liquid nitrogen, or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) during curettage. We assessed recurrence and complication rates and functional outcome after curettage with use of phenol and PMMA, liquid nitrogen and PMMA, and liquid nitrogen and bone grafts.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared the relative effectiveness of treatment of giant cell tumors of bone at two tertiary centers with a regional function from 1990 to 2010. The 132 (of 201) patients who met the inclusion criteria had a mean age of thirty-three years (range, eleven to sixty-nine years). Treatment assignment depended purely on the center, with primary treatment consisting of curettage with use of phenol and PMMA (n = 82) at one center and with use of either liquid nitrogen and PMMA (n = 26) or liquid nitrogen and bone grafts (n = 24) at the other center. Recurrence and complication rates were determined, and functional outcome was assessed on the basis of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score.
RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was eight years (range, two to twenty-two years). Recurrence rates were comparable among the groups (28% for phenol and PMMA, 31% for liquid nitrogen and PMMA, and 38% for liquid nitrogen and bone grafts; p = 0.52). Soft-tissue extension increased the recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 4.0, p = 0.024). The complication rate was 33% after use of liquid nitrogen and bone grafts, 27% after liquid nitrogen and PMMA, and 11% after phenol and PMMA (p = 0.019); complications included osteoarthritis, infection, postoperative fracture, nonunion, transient nerve palsy, and PMMA leakage. The complication risk was increased by the presence of a pathologic fracture (HR = 4.1, 95% CI = 1.7 to 9.5, p = 0.001) and use of liquid nitrogen (HR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.5 to 10, p = 0.006 for liquid nitrogen and bone grafts; HR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.1 to 8.6, p = 0.028 for liquid nitrogen and PMMA). The mean MSTS score was 26 (range, 8 to 30) and was comparable among all three groups (p = 0.52).
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates were comparable for treatment with phenol and PMMA, liquid nitrogen and PMMA, and liquid nitrogen and bone grafts. Complication rates were higher after use of liquid nitrogen. The functional outcome was excellent in all three cohorts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24599207     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  20 in total

1.  Conservative surgery in the treatment of giant cell tumor of the sacrum: 35 years' experience.

Authors:  Stepan V Domovitov; Chandhanarat Chandhanayingyong; Patrick J Boland; David G McKeown; John H Healey
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-10-30

Review 2.  Integration of denosumab therapy in the management of giant cell tumors of bone.

Authors:  Daniel T Miles; Ryan T Voskuil; Wood Dale; Joel L Mayerson; Thomas J Scharschmidt
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-28

3.  Use of warm Ringer's lactate solution in the management of locally advanced giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  Saranatra Waikakul; Apichat Asavamongkolkul; Rapin Phimolsarnti
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Retrospective Audit of Various Surgical Modalities Adopted for Giant Cell Tumor in a Rural Tertiary Cancer Center.

Authors:  Basavaraj Ankalkoti; B Satheesan; J Dipin; P Nizamudheen; N Sangeetha
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06

5.  Development and proposal of a scoring system for giant cell tumour of the bone around the knee.

Authors:  Deng-Xing Lun; Yong-Cheng Hu; Xiong-Gang Yang; Zhen Wang; Xiu-Chun Yu; Su-Jia Wu; Zhao-Ming Ye; Han Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  What Happens to the Articular Surface After Curettage for Epiphyseal Chondroblastoma? A Report on Functional Results, Arthritis, and Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Germán L Farfalli; Pablo A I Slullitel; D Luis Muscolo; Miguel A Ayerza; Luis A Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Curettage as first surgery for bone giant cell tumor : adequate surgery is more important than oncology training or surgical management by high volume specialized teams.

Authors:  Shinji Tsukamoto; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Piergiuseppe Tanzi; Giulio Leone; Manabu Akahane; Yasuhito Tanaka; Costantino Errani
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-13

8.  Recurrence of Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine after Resection: A Report of 10 Cases.

Authors:  Peng Lin; Nong Lin; Wangsiyuan Teng; Sheng-Dong Wang; Wei-Bo Pan; Xin Huang; Xiao-Bo Yan; Meng Liu; Heng-Yuan Li; Bing-Hao Li; Ling-Ling Sun; Zhan Wang; Xing-Zhi Zhou; Zhao-Ming Ye
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 9.  Current status and unanswered questions on the use of Denosumab in giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  Czar Louie Gaston; Robert J Grimer; Michael Parry; Silvia Stacchiotti; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Hans Gelderblom; Stefano Ferrari; Giacomo G Baldi; Robin L Jones; Sant Chawla; Paolo Casali; Axel LeCesne; Jean-Yves Blay; Sander P D Dijkstra; David M Thomas; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Clin Sarcoma Res       Date:  2016-09-14

10.  Giant cell tumor of bone revisited.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Vasileios G Igoumenou; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Panayotis N Soucacos
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.