Literature DB >> 24598454

A multi-residue method for the simultaneous analysis in indoor dust of several classes of semi-volatile organic compounds by pressurized liquid extraction and gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

Fabien Mercier1, Erwann Gilles2, Gaëlle Saramito2, Philippe Glorennec2, Barbara Le Bot2.   

Abstract

People are exposed to multiple pollutants, especially indoors, in particular through ingestion of indoor settled dust. In the perspective of a cumulative risk assessment, a multi-residue analytical method based on pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS) was developed for the simultaneous analysis in indoor dust of several classes of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) of health concern, from trace to highly concentrated compounds, including musk fragrances, organochlorines (OCs), organophosphates (OPs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polybromodiphenylethers (PBDEs), polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs), phthalates and pyrethroids. The method was validated in terms of limits of quantification (LOQ), and accuracy and precision via spiking experiments on an inert material (Celite(®) 545) and replicate analysis of the standard reference material SRM 2585 supplied by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Method LOQs for 200 mg samples of sieved dust were 26 ng g(-1) for PCBs and some OCs, 65 ng g(-1) for musks, OPs, PAHs, PBDEs, pyrethroids, other OCs and some phthalates, 132 ng g(-1) for butylbenzylphthalate (BBP), 197 ng g(-1) for tributylphosphate and 1579 ng g(-1) for other phthalates. Quadratic calibration curves were established for each compound by analyzing at least five calibration solutions and exhibited determination coefficients higher than 0.999. The method was successfully applied to the SRM 2585 and seven real indoor dust samples. The results obtained on SRM 2585 demonstrate both excellent reproducibility and agreement with the indicative, reference or certified values and provide, for the first time, indicative concentrations for chlorpyrifos, diazinon, diisononylphthalate (DiNP) and tetramethrin. The results obtained on real dust samples illustrate the ability of the proposed method to quantify a wide range of SVOCs in a single analysis, making it appropriate for environmental monitoring programs or large-scale studies with a large number of samples.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gas chromatography; Indoor dust; Multi-residue method; Pressurized liquid extraction; Semi-volatile organic compounds; Tandem mass spectrometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24598454     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  4 in total

1.  Household Dust as a Repository of Chemical Accumulation: New Insights from a Comprehensive High-Resolution Mass Spectrometric Study.

Authors:  Christoph Moschet; Tarun Anumol; Bonny M Lew; Deborah H Bennett; Thomas M Young
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Children's exposure to phthalates and non-phthalate plasticizers in the home: The TESIE study.

Authors:  Stephanie C Hammel; Jessica L Levasseur; Kate Hoffman; Allison L Phillips; Amelia M Lorenzo; Antonia M Calafat; Thomas F Webster; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Indoor exposure to phthalates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to Canadian children: the Kingston allergy birth cohort.

Authors:  Yuchao Wan; Michelle L North; Garthika Navaranjan; Anne K Ellis; Jeffrey A Siegel; Miriam L Diamond
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Detection of Mycotoxins in Highly Matrix-Loaded House-Dust Samples by QTOF-HRMS, IM-QTOF-HRMS, and TQMS: Advantages and Disadvantages.

Authors:  Viktoria Lindemann; Jessica Schmidt; Benedikt Cramer; Hans-Ulrich Humpf
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.