Literature DB >> 24598397

New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction.

Francesca Verboschi, Daniela Domanico, Marcella Nebbioso, Giulia Corradetti, Sergio Zaccaria Scalinci, Enzo Maria Vingolo.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback in advanced optic neural dysfunction due to glaucoma, and to precisely characterize fixation stability and location in affected patients. Ten patients (18 eyes) with advanced glaucoma were submitted to a rehabilitation protocol that consisted of: a 25-item questionnaire (National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Que stionnaire); measurement of visual acuity; a reading speed test; microperimetry with fixation study, retinal sensitivity and the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA). The rehabilitation program consisted of 10 training sessions of 10 minutes per eye performed over a period of one week and was repeated at four months, eight months, and one year. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test and Spearman correlation; p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. In 13 eyes fixation changed from unstable to relatively unstable while its location changed from predominantly eccentric to predominantly central. In five eyes, fixation changed from relatively unstable to stable with a change of location from poor central fixation to predominantly New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction central fixation. Mean retinal sensitivity changed from 7.43±8.28 dB to 8.33±9.04 dB (p<0.05); the mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.98±0.66 logMAR at the baseline assessment, and 0.75±0.6 logMAR at the end of rehabilitation (p>0.05); reading speed improved from a mean value of 31.4±4.3 words/minute to 55.6±3.2 words/minute at the end of the training (p<0.05). The BCEA changed from 0.94±0.39 deg2 to 0.86±0.46 deg2 (p=0.76). Rehabilitation with MP-1 biofeedback in patients with advanced glaucoma is a useful means of improving these patients' fixation stability, reading speed and quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24598397      PMCID: PMC3951257          DOI: 10.11138/FNeur/2013.28.4.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Neurol        ISSN: 0393-5264


  37 in total

1.  New trends in neuroscience: the challenge of Functional Neurology.

Authors:  Egidio D'Angelo
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

2.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M Mangione; P P Lee; P R Gutierrez; K Spritzer; S Berry; R D Hays
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

3.  Treating myopia with acoustic biofeedback: a prospective study on the evolution of visual acuity and psychological distress.

Authors:  G Rupolo; M Angi; E Sabbadin; S Caucci; E Pilotto; E Racano; C de Bertolini
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 4.  Multifaceted treatment of congenital nystagmus: a report of 6 cases.

Authors:  V Leung; B Wick; H E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  A sick eye in a sick body? Systemic findings in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Mona Pache; Josef Flammer
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness.

Authors:  E Kasten; S Wüst; W Behrens-Baumann; B A Sabel
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  The importance of sustained attention for patients with maculopathies.

Authors:  E Altpeter; M Mackeben; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  An instrument for biofeedback applied to vision.

Authors:  Dario Giorgi; Maria Teresa Contestabile; Elena Pacella; Corrado Balacco Gabrieli
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2005-12

Review 9.  Definition of glaucoma: clinical and experimental concepts.

Authors:  Robert J Casson; Glyn Chidlow; John P M Wood; Jonathan G Crowston; Ivan Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Visual field changes after a rehabilitation intervention: vision restoration therapy.

Authors:  Jose G Romano; Patricia Schulz; Sigrid Kenkel; David P Todd
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.181

View more
  7 in total

1.  Abnormal stereopsis and reduced retinal sensitivity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Enzo Maria Vingolo; Paolo Giuseppe Limoli; Robert Davis Jr Steigerwalt; Sandra Cinzia Carlesimo; Serena Salvatore
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Understanding the role of microperimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  Luca Scuderi; Irene Gattazzo; Alessandro de Paula; Clemente Maria Iodice; Federico Di Tizio; Andrea Perdicchi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.029

3.  Biofeedback fixation training method for improving eccentric vision in patients with loss of foveal function secondary to different maculopathies.

Authors:  Marco U Morales; Saker Saker; Craig Wilde; Martin Rubinstein; Paolo Limoli; Winfried M Amoaku
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Test-Retest Reproducibility of the Microperimeter MP3 With Fundus Image Tracking in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Macular Disease.

Authors:  Stefan Palkovits; Nino Hirnschall; Stefan Georgiev; Christoph Leisser; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Self-sealing posterior scleral perforation in airgun ocular trauma, surgical tip: a case report.

Authors:  Fabiana Mallone; Michela Marcelli; Riccardo Monsellato; Federica Franzone; Magda Gharbiya; Alessandro Lambiase
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training

Authors:  Ayşe Bozkurt Oflaz; Banu Turgut Öztürk; Şaban Gönül; Berker Bakbak; Şansal Gedik; Süleyman Okudan
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-23

7.  Visual Recovery after Primary Retinal Detachment Surgery: Biofeedback Rehabilitative Strategy.

Authors:  Enzo M Vingolo; Serena Fragiotta; Daniela Domanico; Paolo G Limoli; Marcella Nebbioso; Leopoldo Spadea
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 1.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.