Literature DB >> 24597764

Randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation.

Michael K McGuire1, E Todd Scheyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for increasing keratinized tissue (KT) and vestibular area is an autogenous free gingival graft (FGG) and vestibuloplasty; however, there is morbidity associated with the harvest of autogenous tissue, and supply is limited. The purpose of this study is to determine if a xenogeneic collagen matrix (CM) might be as effective as FGG.
METHODS: This study is a single-masked, randomized, controlled, split-mouth study of 30 patients with insufficient zones of KT (<2 mm). It uses a within-patient treatment-comparison design to establish non-inferiority of the test (CM) versus control (FGG) therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in KT width (∆KT) from surgery to 6 months post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included traditional periodontal measures, such as clinical attachment level, recession, and bleeding on probing. Patient-reported pain, discomfort, and esthetic satisfaction were also recorded. Biopsies were obtained at 6 months.
RESULTS: Surgery and postoperative sequelae were uneventful, with normal healing observed at both test and control sites. The primary outcome, ∆KT width at 6 months, did not establish non-inferiority of CM compared to FGG (P = 0.9992), with the FGG sites averaging 1.5 mm more KT width than CM sites. However, the amount of new KT generated for both therapies averaged ≥2 mm. Secondary outcomes were not significantly different between test and control sites. All site biopsies appeared as normal mucoperiosteum with keratinized epithelium. CM sites achieved better texture and color matches, and more than two-thirds of patients preferred the appearance of their CM sites.
CONCLUSION: With the proviso of sufficient KT (≈2 mm in width) and study goals of lower morbidity, unlimited supply, and patient satisfaction, CM appears to be a suitable substitute for FGG in vestibuloplasty procedures designed to increase KT around teeth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collagen; autologous; gingiva; heterologous; keratin; transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24597764     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2014.130692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  12 in total

1.  Clinical and histologic evaluation of different approaches to gain keratinized tissue prior to implant placement in fully edentulous patients.

Authors:  Daniel S Thoma; AbdulMonem Alshihri; Alain Fontolliet; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Goran I Benic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Expansion of the peri-implant attached gingiva with a three-dimensional collagen matrix in head and neck cancer patients-results from a prospective clinical and histological study.

Authors:  Jonas Lorenz; Maximilian Blume; Mike Barbeck; Anna Teiler; C James Kirkpatrick; Robert A Sader; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Basic Principles of Bioengineering and Regeneration.

Authors:  Tara L Aghaloo; Danny Hadaya
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 4.  Application of drug delivery systems for the controlled delivery of growth factors to treat nervous system injury.

Authors:  Fukai Ma; Fan Wang; Ronggang Li; Jianhong Zhu
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 5.  Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Renzo G Bassetti; Alexandra Stähli; Mario A Bassetti; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Evaluation of oral keratinocyte progenitor and T-lymphocite cells response during early healing after augmentation of keratinized gingiva with a 3D collagen matrix - a pilot study.

Authors:  Darian Rusu; Bogdan Calenic; Maria Greabu; Alexander Kralev; Marius Boariu; Florina Bojin; Simona Anghel; Virgil Paunescu; Octavia Vela; Horia Calniceanu; Stefan-Ioan Stratul
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 7.  Soft tissue substitutes in non-root coverage procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Maximilian Melchard; Nikolaos Pandis; Michael Müller-Kern; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Collagen Matrix vs. Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Vallecillo; Manuel Toledano-Osorio; Marta Vallecillo-Rivas; Manuel Toledano; Alberto Rodriguez-Archilla; Raquel Osorio
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amirreza Rokn; Hadi Zare; Pardis Haddadi
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2020-03-08

10.  Patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes following peri-implant vestibuloplasty with a free gingival graft versus xenogeneic collagen matrix: a comparative prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Xiaojiao Fu; Ying Wang; Bo Chen; Jiehua Tian; Ye Lin; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.