Literature DB >> 24596742

Assessment of the potential of pathological stains in human prostate cancer.

Anchit Khanna1, Rani Patil2, Abhay Deshmukh3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incidence of prostate cancer in India is relatively low compared to the western countries. Nevertheless, an increase by 1% yearly has been recorded in the last three years, thereby making early diagnosis of prostate cancer crucial for controlling its incidence. Differentiating between benign and malignant lesions has been a diagnostic dilemma, especially in prostate pathology. This is compounded by unavailability of modern tests in certain regions of developing nations.
METHODS: A cohort of one hundred seventy six prostatomegaly patients used in the current study was obtained both retrospectively and prospectively at the Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. Details of the patients were recorded which included their age. The samples were then cut into 5 sections, each of 5micron thickness. One section was preserved and the other 4 sections were subjected to Hematoxylin and Eosin (H and E), Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS), Alcian Blue and AgNOR stains. Degree of differentiation was estimated and correlated with the Gleason score and the outcome of the stainings.
RESULTS: Majority of benign prostatic hyperplasia and all primary carcinoma patients were in their sixth to eighth decade of life. While all the benign lesions were negative, 6 out of 9 primary prostate carcinomas were positive for Alcian Blue stain. Majority of both benign and malignant lesions were positive for Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) stain. In terms of Argyrophilic Nucleolar Organiser Region (AgNOR) count per nucleus, the value in benign lesions was observed to be half the count observed in malignant lesions per nucleus.
CONCLUSION: Although the potential use of the orthodox stains individually may not serve the purpose to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, together they may have the potential to identify relatively more malignant cases. This may be helpful especially in low socio-economic countries and rural areas where molecular based tests may not yet be available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcian blue; Argyrophilic Nucleolar Organiser Region (AgNOR); Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH); Prostate Cancer

Year:  2014        PMID: 24596742      PMCID: PMC3939521          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7002.3938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  33 in total

1.  Prostate cancer in bone: importance of context for inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases.

Authors:  Mina J Bissell; Johanne Le Beyec; Robin L Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Molecular genetics of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Abate-Shen; M M Shen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Should bisphosphonates be used routinely in patients with prostate cancer metastatic to bone?

Authors:  Christina M Canil; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  The common biology of cancer and ageing.

Authors:  Toren Finkel; Manuel Serrano; Maria A Blasco
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging.

Authors:  D F Gleason; G T Mellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  COMPUTER-AIDED GLEASON GRADING OF PROSTATE CANCER HISTOPATHOLOGICAL IMAGES USING TEXTON FORESTS.

Authors:  Parmeshwar Khurd; Claus Bahlmann; Peter Maday; Ali Kamen; Summer Gibbs-Strauss; Elizabeth M Genega; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-04-17

Review 7.  Prospective evaluation of prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density in the detection of nonpalpable and stage T1C carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  J C Presti; R Hovey; P R Carroll; K Shinohara
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Keratin immunoreactivity in the benign and neoplastic human prostate.

Authors:  M K Brawer; D M Peehl; T A Stamey; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  MYC-dependent regulation and prognostic role of CIP2A in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Anchit Khanna; Camilla Böckelman; Annabrita Hemmes; Melissa R Junttila; Jan-Patrik Wiksten; Mikael Lundin; Siina Junnila; Daniel J Murphy; Gerard I Evan; Caj Haglund; Jukka Westermarck; Ari Ristimäki
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Senescence sensitivity of breast cancer cells is defined by positive feedback loop between CIP2A and E2F1.

Authors:  Anni Laine; Harri Sihto; Christophe Come; Mathias T Rosenfeldt; Aleksandra Zwolinska; Minna Niemelä; Anchit Khanna; Edward K Chan; Veli-Matti Kähäri; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Owen J Sansom; Gerard I Evan; Melissa R Junttila; Kevin M Ryan; Jean-Christophe Marine; Heikki Joensuu; Jukka Westermarck
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 39.397

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: intraindividual comparison of gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Balamurugan Vellayappan; Matthias Taupitz; Bernd Hamm; Patrick Asbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  CIP2A is a candidate therapeutic target in clinically challenging prostate cancer cell populations.

Authors:  Anchit Khanna; Jayant K Rane; Kati K Kivinummi; Alfonso Urbanucci; Merja A Helenius; Teemu T Tolonen; Outi R Saramäki; Leena Latonen; Visa Manni; John E Pimanda; Norman J Maitland; Jukka Westermarck; Tapio Visakorpi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-08-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.