Literature DB >> 24596499

Nutritional and ecological evaluation of dairy farming systems based on concentrate feeding regimes in semi-arid environments of Jordan.

Othman Alqaisi1, Torsten Hemme2, Martin Hagemann2, Andreas Susenbeth3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutritional and ecological aspects of feeding systems practiced under semi-arid environments in Jordan. Nine dairy farms representing the different dairy farming systems were selected for this study. Feed samples (n = 58), fecal samples (n = 108), and milk samples (n = 78) were collected from the farms and analysed for chemical composition. Feed samples were also analysed for metabolisable energy (ME) contents and in vitro organic matter digestibility according to Hohenheim-Feed-Test. Furthermore, fecal nitrogen concentration was determined to estimate in vivo organic matter digestibility. ME and nutrient intakes were calculated based on the farmer's estimate of dry matter intake and the analysed composition of the feed ingredients. ME and nutrient intakes were compared to recommended standard values for adequate supply of ME, utilizable crude protein, rumen undegradable crude protein (RUCP), phosphorus (P), and calcium (Ca). Technology Impact Policy Impact Calculation model complemented with a partial life cycle assessment model was used to estimate greenhouse gas emissions of milk production at farm gate. The model predicts CH4, N2O and CO2 gases emitted either directly or indirectly. Average daily energy corrected milk yield (ECM) was 19 kg and ranged between 11 and 27 kg. The mean of ME intake of all farms was 184 MJ/d with a range between 115 and 225 MJ/d. Intake of RUCP was lower than the standard requirements in six farms ranging between 19 and 137 g/d, was higher (32 and 93 g/d) in two farms, and matched the requirements in one farm. P intake was higher than the requirements in all farms (mean oversupply = 19 g/d) and ranged between 3 and 30 g/d. Ca intake was significantly below the requirements in small scale farms. Milk nitrogen efficiency N-eff (milk N/intake N) varied between 19% and 28% and was mainly driven by the level of milk yield. Total CO2 equivalent (CO2 equ) emission ranged between 0.90 and 1.88 kg CO2/kg ECM milk, where the enteric and manure CH4 contributed to 52% of the total CO2 equ emissions, followed by the indirect emissions of N2O and the direct emissions of CO2 gases which comprises 17% and 15%, respectively, from total CO2 equ emissions. Emissions per kg of milk were significantly driven by the level of milk production (r (2) = 0.93) and of eDMI (r (2) = 0.88), while the total emissions were not influenced by diet composition. A difference of 16 kg ECM/d in milk yield, 9% in N-eff and of 0.9 kg CO2 equ/kg in ECM milk observed between low and high yielding animals. To improve the nutritional status of the animals, protein requirements have to be met. Furthermore, low price by-products with a low carbon credit should be included in the diets to replace the high proportion of imported concentrate feeds and consequently improve the economic situation of dairy farms and mitigate CO2 equ emissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dairy; Efficiency; Feeding systems; Greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs)

Year:  2013        PMID: 24596499      PMCID: PMC3937470          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci        ISSN: 2213-7106            Impact factor:   4.219


  24 in total

1.  Effects of insulin and postruminal supply of protein on use of amino acids by the mammary gland for milk protein synthesis.

Authors:  T R Mackle; D A Dwyer; K L Ingvartsen; P Y Chouinard; D A Ross; D E Bauman
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Alternative approaches to predicting methane emissions from dairy cows.

Authors:  J A N Mills; E Kebreab; C M Yates; L A Crompton; S B Cammell; M S Dhanoa; R E Agnew; J France
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment.

Authors:  C A Rotz; F Montes; D S Chianese
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Altering physically effective fiber intake through forage proportion and particle length: digestion and milk production.

Authors:  W Z Yang; K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Modeling the adequacy of dietary fiber in dairy cows based on the responses of ruminal pH and milk fat production to composition of the diet.

Authors:  Q Zebeli; J Dijkstra; M Tafaj; H Steingass; B N Ametaj; W Drochner
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Milk production, reproductive performance, and fecal excretion of phosphorus by dairy cows fed three amounts of phosphorus.

Authors:  Z Wu; L D Satter; R Sojo
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Milk production during the complete lactation of dairy cows fed diets containing different amounts of protein.

Authors:  Z Wu; L D Satter
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Effects of dietary neutral detergent fiber concentration and alfalfa hay quality on chewing, rumen function, and milk production of dairy cows.

Authors:  K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from United States dairy and feedlot cattle.

Authors:  E Kebreab; K A Johnson; S L Archibeque; D Pape; T Wirth
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Nutritional and management strategies on nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency of lactating dairy cattle on commercial farms: an environmental perspective.

Authors:  H Arriaga; M Pinto; S Calsamiglia; P Merino
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.