Literature DB >> 20172247

The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment.

C A Rotz1, F Montes, D S Chianese.   

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their potential effect on the environment has become an important national and international issue. Dairy production, along with all other types of animal agriculture, is a recognized source of GHG emissions, but little information exists on the net emissions from dairy farms. Component models for predicting all important sources and sinks of CH(4), N(2)O, and CO(2) from primary and secondary sources in dairy production were integrated in a software tool called the Dairy Greenhouse Gas model, or DairyGHG. This tool calculates the carbon footprint of a dairy production system as the net exchange of all GHG in CO(2) equivalent units per unit of energy-corrected milk produced. Primary emission sources include enteric fermentation, manure, cropland used in feed production, and the combustion of fuel in machinery used to produce feed and handle manure. Secondary emissions are those occurring during the production of resources used on the farm, which can include fuel, electricity, machinery, fertilizer, pesticides, plastic, and purchased replacement animals. A long-term C balance is assumed for the production system, which does not account for potential depletion or sequestration of soil carbon. An evaluation of dairy farms of various sizes and production strategies gave carbon footprints of 0.37 to 0.69kg of CO(2) equivalent units/kg of energy-corrected milk, depending upon milk production level and the feeding and manure handling strategies used. In a comparison with previous studies, DairyGHG predicted C footprints similar to those reported when similar assumptions were made for feeding strategy, milk production, allocation method between milk and animal coproducts, and sources of CO(2) and secondary emissions. DairyGHG provides a relatively simple tool for evaluating management effects on net GHG emissions and the overall carbon footprint of dairy production systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20172247     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  8 in total

1.  Measurement and prediction of enteric methane emission.

Authors:  Veerasamy Sejian; Rattan Lal; Jeffrey Lakritz; Thaddeus Ezeji
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  The cost and profitability analysis of different dairy farm sizes.

Authors:  Deniz Sarica; Vecdi Demircan; Asli Naziroglu; Ozgur Aydin; Hayati Koknaroglu
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 1.893

3.  Carbon and blue water footprints of California sheep production.

Authors:  Holland C Dougherty; James W Oltjen; Frank M Mitloehner; Edward J DePeters; Lee Allen Pettey; Dan Macon; Julie Finzel; Kimberly Rodrigues; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Nutritional and ecological evaluation of dairy farming systems based on concentrate feeding regimes in semi-arid environments of Jordan.

Authors:  Othman Alqaisi; Torsten Hemme; Martin Hagemann; Andreas Susenbeth
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  RNA-Seq transcriptomics and pathway analyses reveal potential regulatory genes and molecular mechanisms in high- and low-residual feed intake in Nordic dairy cattle.

Authors:  M S Salleh; G Mazzoni; J K Höglund; D W Olijhoek; P Lund; P Løvendahl; H N Kadarmideen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Dynamic analysis of agricultural carbon emissions efficiency in Chinese provinces along the Belt and Road.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Sidai Guo; Yubing Qian; Yan Liu; Chengpeng Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through different dairy cattle systems in subtropical regions.

Authors:  Henrique M N Ribeiro-Filho; Maurício Civiero; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Carbon Footprint Assessment of Spanish Dairy Cattle Farms: Effectiveness of Dietary and Farm Management Practices as a Mitigation Strategy.

Authors:  Ridha Ibidhi; Sergio Calsamiglia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.