Literature DB >> 24595678

Communicating the benefits and harms of cancer screening.

Lindsay J L Forbes1, Amanda J Ramirez.   

Abstract

Breast and cervical screening each have a distinct balance of benefits and harms. While they are both likely to reduce mortality, breast screening is associated with a greater relative frequency of serious harms than cervical screening. A unique approach has been adopted in England with respect to providing information on cancer screening with the goal of facilitating informed choice. The new materials provide more detail than previous information about the benefits and harms of screening as well as the scientific uncertainties. While there is a uniform format and the information covers the same key issues in both breast and cervical screening programmes, the emphasis and detail varies according to balance of benefits and harms within these programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24595678     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-014-0382-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  14 in total

1.  Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model.

Authors:  P Sasieni; J Adams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

Review 2.  The psychological impact of abnormal cytology and colposcopy.

Authors:  K E Rogstad
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 3.  Overdiagnosis in cancer.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; William C Black
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: an opportunity for improvement.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Ian M Thompson; Brian Reid
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Women's knowledge about breast cancer risk and their views of the purpose and implications of breast screening--a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Premila Webster; Joan Austoker
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 2.341

Review 7.  Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Andrew Bryant; Heather O Dickinson; Sarah L Keep
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

Review 8.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Margrethe Nielsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-01-19

9.  Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Margaret R E McCredie; Katrina J Sharples; Charlotte Paul; Judith Baranyai; Gabriele Medley; Ronald W Jones; David C G Skegg
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 10.  Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leslea Peirson; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Donna Ciliska; Rachel Warren
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-05-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  How Do Women Interpret the NHS Information Leaflet about Cervical Cancer Screening?

Authors:  Yasmina Okan; Dafina Petrova; Samuel G Smith; Vedran Lesic; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  How is cervical cancer screening information communicated in UK websites? Cross-sectional analysis of content and quantitative presentation formats.

Authors:  Yasmina Okan; Samuel G Smith; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.