Literature DB >> 24595628

Predictive and explanatory factors of change in HbA1c in a 24-week observational study of 66,726 people with type 2 diabetes starting insulin analogs.

Philip D Home1, Chunduo Shen, Mohammad I Hasan, Zafar A Latif, Jian-Wen Chen, Guillermo González Gálvez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Individualization of therapy choices requires the prediction of likely response. Predictor and explanatory factors of change in HbA1c were studied using data from a large observational study of starting insulin analog therapy (the A1chieve study). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Univariate analyses were performed for insulin-naive people and prior insulin users in the A1chieve study. Statistically significant factors were carried forward to baseline factor-only multivariate analyses ("predictor" analysis), and separately using all significant factors ("explanatory" analysis). Power was considered in terms of the variance explained.
RESULTS: Geographical region, baseline HbA1c level, lipid levels, and baseline insulin dose were the most powerful predictors of HbA1c change (mean change -2.1% [-23 mmol/mol]) observed in the univariate analysis (r2 > 0.010, P < 0.001). However, although the predictor and explanatory multivariate models explained 62-82% of the variance in HbA1c change, this was mainly associated with baseline HbA1c (r2 = 0.544-0.701) and region (r2 = 0.014-0.037). Other factors were statistically significant but had low predictive power (r2 < 0.010); in the explanatory analysis, this included end-of-study hypoglycemia (insulin-naive group), insulin dose, and health-related quality of life (r(2) < 0.001-0.006, P ≤ 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Many factors can guide clinicians in predicting the response to starting therapy with insulin analogs, but many are interdependent and thus of poor utility. The factor explaining most of the variance in HbA1c change is baseline HbA1c level, with each increase of 1.0%-units (11 mmol/mol) providing a 0.7-0.8%-units (8-9 mmol/mol) greater fall. Other factors do not explain much of the remaining variance, even when including all end-of-trial measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24595628     DOI: 10.2337/dc13-2413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  15 in total

1.  Setting the hemoglobin A1c target in type 2 diabetes: a priori, a posteriori, or neither?

Authors:  Dario Giugliano; Maria Ida Maiorino; Giuseppe Bellastella; Michela Petrizzo; Antonio Ceriello; Stefano Genovese; Katherine Esposito
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Race analysis in an African American sample with serious mental illness and comorbid diabetes.

Authors:  Martha Sajatovic; Molly Howland; Douglas Gunzler; Stephanie W Kanuch; Kristin A Cassidy; Richard McCormick; Mark S Bauer; Thomas Scheidemantel; Charles Thomas; Carol Blixen; Neal V Dawson
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2018-09

Review 3.  A nomogram to estimate the HbA1c response to different DPP-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 98 trials with 24 163 patients.

Authors:  Katherine Esposito; Paolo Chiodini; Maria Ida Maiorino; Annalisa Capuano; Domenico Cozzolino; Michela Petrizzo; Giuseppe Bellastella; Dario Giugliano
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: the EDIT randomized trial.

Authors:  Seiji Sato; Yoshifumi Saisho; Kinsei Kou; Shu Meguro; Masami Tanaka; Junichiro Irie; Toshihide Kawai; Hiroshi Itoh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Clinical Characteristics of Patients Responding to Once-Daily Basal Insulin Therapy in Korean Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Sun Ok Song; You-Cheol Hwang; Kyu-Jeung Ahn; Bong Soo Cha; Young Duk Song; Dae Wook Lee; Byung-Wan Lee
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 6.  Drug-related risk of severe hypoglycaemia in observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcin Czech; Elżbieta Rdzanek; Justyna Pawęska; Olga Adamowicz-Sidor; Maciej Niewada; Michał Jakubczyk
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.763

7.  Insulin Glargine Combined with Oral Antidiabetic Drugs for Asians with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis to Identify Predictors of Dose and Treatment Response.

Authors:  Tianwei Gu; Ting Hong; Pengzi Zhang; Sunyinyan Tang; Yan Bi; Hai Lu; Lichuang Men; Dongwei Ma; Dalong Zhu
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.945

8.  Commencing insulin glargine 100 U/mL therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes: Determinants of achievement of HbA1c goal less than 7.0.

Authors:  David R Owens; Wolfgang Landgraf; Brian M Frier; Mei Zhang; Philip D Home; Luigi Meneghini; Geremia B Bolli
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 9.  Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogues Versus Regular Human Insulin: A Meta-Analysis of Effects on Glycemic Control in Patients with Diabetes.

Authors:  Antonio Nicolucci; Antonio Ceriello; Paolo Di Bartolo; Antonella Corcos; Marco Orsini Federici
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.945

10.  Association of Patient Profile with Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stephen M Twigg; Javier Escalada; Peter Stella; Ana Merino-Trigo; Fernando J Lavalle-Gonzalez; Bertrand Cariou; Luigi F Meneghini
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.945

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.