Literature DB >> 24594406

The importance of surgeon characteristics on impacting oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Bimal Bhindi1, Julie Yu2, Cynthia Kuk3, Srikala S Sridhar4, Robert J Hamilton5, Antonio Finelli5, Michael A S Jewett5, Andrew Evans6, Neil E Fleshner5, Alexandre R Zlotta7, Girish S Kulkarni8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Given that the urologist has a major influence on outcomes of radical cystectomy, it is of interest to patients, trainees, urologists and administrators to understand the provider characteristics associated with favorable outcomes. Therefore, we assessed associations between various surgeon characteristics and long-term oncologic outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort treated with radical cystectomy for muscle invasive or nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer at University Health Network (Toronto) was assembled. The characteristics studied included years of experience in independent practice, surgical radical cystectomy volume, subspecialized focus in bladder cancer and uro-oncology fellowship training. The outcomes were overall survival, bladder cancer specific survival and recurrence-free survival. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for patient, tumor and treatment related parameters were used.
RESULTS: The final cohort included 410 patients treated by 11 urologists (median followup 57 months). Bladder cancer focused and uro-oncology fellowship trained urologists performed more extensive lymphadenectomies and more often performed continent diversions, but there was no difference in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In Kaplan-Meier and univariate Cox analyses, subspecialized bladder cancer focus and uro-oncology fellowship were associated with improved survival outcomes. However, in multivariate Cox models only subspecialized bladder cancer focus was independently associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.85, p <0.001), bladder cancer specific survival (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.96, p = 0.032) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.95, p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: While radical cystectomy volume, experience and uro-oncology fellowship are all likely important, we found that subspecialized focus in bladder cancer was independently associated with improved long-term oncologic outcomes. Our data support disease site differentiation among uro-oncologists at large institutions.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cystectomy; mortality; patient outcome assessment; urinary bladder neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24594406     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  Fluorescence-Based Molecular Imaging of Porcine Urinary Bladder Sentinel Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Hak J Lee; Christopher V Barback; Carl K Hoh; Zhengtao Qin; Kareem Kader; David J Hall; David R Vera; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Improving outcomes of radical cystectomy: A call for passive over active regionalization.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Improving patient journey and quality of care: Summary from the second Bladder Cancer Canada-Canadian Urological Association-Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (BCC-CUA-CUOG) bladder cancer quality of care consensus meeting.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Fred Saad; Rodney H Breau; Girish Kulkarni; David M Guttman; Ken Bagshaw; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Fadi Brimo; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Niels Jacobsen; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Alex Zlotta; Neil Fleshner; D Robert Siemens; Peter C Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Identification of the best complete blood count-based predictors for bladder cancer outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Bimal Bhindi; Thomas Hermanns; Yanliang Wei; Julie Yu; Patrick O Richard; Marian S Wettstein; Arnoud Templeton; Kathy Li; Srikala S Sridhar; Michael A S Jewett; Neil E Fleshner; Alexandre R Zlotta; Girish S Kulkarni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Treatment of bladder cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Annette Erlich; Alexandre R Zlotta
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-05-27

7.  The impact of patient-related nonmodifiable factors on perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy with enhanced recovery protocol.

Authors:  Daniel Zainfeld; Jian Chen; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Anne Schuckman; Siamak Daneshmand; Hooman Djaladat
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-11-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.